Craig Wright 因使用 BTC 代碼而起訴比特幣核心開發商和 Square Up Europe Ltd.，索賠 9,110 億英鎊

仍然堅信自己是比特幣創造者中本聰的人發起了全新的法律攻擊。這次，他因使用 BTC 代碼而起訴 Bitcoin Core 開發商和 Square Up Europe Ltd.，索賠 9,110 億英鎊（約 1 兆美元）。

Craig Wright, the self-proclaimed creator of Bitcoin, has launched a new legal attack by suing Bitcoin Core developers and Square Up Europe Ltd. for a staggering £911 billion (around $1 trillion) over the use of the $BTC ticker.

自稱比特幣創造者的克雷格懷特(Craig Wright) 發起了新的法律攻擊，起訴Bitcoin Core 開發商和Square Up Europe Ltd.，因使用BTC 代碼而索賠9110 億英鎊（約合1 萬億美元）。

The lawsuit alleges that Craig is entitled to compensation for damages incurred due to the defendants' actions. Notably, Craig is representing himself in this case without the assistance of a lawyer.

訴訟稱，克雷格有權就被告行為造成的損失獲得賠償。值得注意的是，克雷格在沒有律師協助的情況下在本案中代表自己。

Despite losing numerous cases in the past, including a recent High Court ruling that barred him from claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Craig continues to pursue legal avenues.

儘管克雷格過去輸掉了許多官司，包括最近高等法院的一項裁決，禁止他聲稱自己是中本聰，但克雷格仍在繼續尋求法律途徑。

He claims that a partnership existed between himself and the Bitcoin Core developers, although the details of this partnership are unclear.

他聲稱自己和比特幣核心開發者之間存在合作關係，儘管這種合作關係的細節尚不清楚。

“I will debate any party officially representing BTC Core, and I stand ready to engage in an open, honest, and—I emphasize—completely honest debate,” Wright said. “If they can prove that BTC Core remains true to the original concept of Bitcoin, as defined by its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, I will drop all litigation immediately.”

賴特表示：“我將與任何正式代表 BTC Core 的政黨進行辯論，我隨時準備進行公開、誠實的辯論，而且我強調，完全誠實的辯論。” “如果他們能夠證明 BTC Core 仍然忠於比特幣的原始概念，正如其創建者中本聰所定義的那樣，我將立即放棄所有訴訟。”

In a recent tweet, Craig hinted at further legal threats, specifically targeting MicroStrategy and its co-founder Michael Saylor, accusing them of misleading people about Bitcoin's origins and who controls it.

在最近的一條推文中，Craig 暗示了進一步的法律威脅，特別是針對 MicroStrategy 及其聯合創始人 Michael Saylor，指責他們在比特幣的起源和控制者方面誤導人們。

"The lawsuits are about setting the record straight. The rewriting of history didn't start with debates about big blocks or technical disagreements over scalability. It began when I made the decision to stand by the original version of Bitcoin, unaltered, and untouched by the hands of those who wanted to twist it into something it was never meant to be," he said in an extended rant.

「這些訴訟是為了澄清事實。歷史的改寫並不是從關於大區塊的辯論或可擴展性方面的技術分歧開始的。它開始於我決定支持比特幣的原始版本，不做改變，不被任何科技所影響。 那些想把它扭曲成本來就不該的東西的人的手，」他長篇大論地說。

According to Craig, the current developers and influencers, including Jameson Lopp and Peter Rizen, tried to hijack Bitcoin by pushing their own agendas. He claims they once supported him but turned against him when he refused to compromise on Bitcoin’s original design.

據克雷格稱，當前的開發者和影響者，包括詹姆森·洛普和彼得·里森，試圖透過推動自己的議程來劫持比特幣。他聲稱他們曾經支持他，但當他拒絕就比特幣的原始設計妥協時，他們轉而反對他。

He alleges that they wanted him to endorse changes to the Bitcoin protocol, and when he declined, they “rewrote the narrative” to cast him as the villain.

他聲稱他們希望他支持對比特幣協議的修改，當他拒絕時，他們“重寫了敘述”，把他塑造成惡棍。

Despite being widely discredited, Craig's claim that he is Satoshi Nakamoto remains protected by free speech laws.

儘管受到廣泛質疑，克雷格聲稱自己是中本聰的說法仍然受到言論自由法的保護。

The court ruled that while Craig cannot assert this claim in any legal capacity, he can still share his opinions on Bitcoin.

法院裁定，雖然克雷格不能以任何法律身分主張這項主張，但他仍然可以分享他對比特幣的看法。

Justice Mellor said that future claims Craig might bring would be “empty rhetoric.” The legal system has limited power to stop someone like this completely.

梅勒法官表示，克雷格未來可能提出的索賠將是「空話」。法律體系的權力有限，無法完全阻止這樣的人。

He's legally free to file lawsuits on other matters as long as he provides a legitimate reason, no matter how dubious it seems.

只要他提供正當理由，無論看起來多麼可疑，他都可以在法律上自由地就其他事項提起訴訟。

Courts can’t simply shut him down, even though he's been proven to fabricate documents and lie under oath.

即使他已被證明偽造文件並宣誓撒謊，法院也不能簡單地禁止他。

He's already said he plans to appeal the court rulings that went against him, prolonging the litigation process indefinitely.

他已經表示，他計劃對不利於他的法院裁決提出上訴，從而無限期地延長訴訟程序。

Appeals, in Craig’s hands, are a way to drag out his cases for as long as possible, ensuring that his claims remain in the public eye, even when he keeps losing. How crazy is that?

在克雷格手中，上訴是盡可能拖延案件的一種方式，確保即使他不斷敗訴，他的主張仍留在公眾視野中。這有多瘋狂？

The strategy has worked well for him so far too. But Mellor is concerned that Craig's actions would undermine the integrity of the legal system if left unchecked.

到目前為止，這個策略對他來說也很有效。但梅勒擔心，如果不加以製止，克雷格的行為將損害法律體系的完整性。