Craig Wright 因使用 BTC 代码而起诉比特币核心开发商和 Square Up Europe Ltd.，索赔 9110 亿英镑

仍然坚信自己是比特币创造者中本聪的人发起了全新的法律攻击。这次，他因使用 BTC 代码而起诉 Bitcoin Core 开发商和 Square Up Europe Ltd.，索赔 9110 亿英镑（约合 1 万亿美元）。

Craig Wright, the self-proclaimed creator of Bitcoin, has launched a new legal attack by suing Bitcoin Core developers and Square Up Europe Ltd. for a staggering £911 billion (around $1 trillion) over the use of the $BTC ticker.

自称比特币创造者的克雷格·怀特 (Craig Wright) 发起了新的法律攻击，起诉 Bitcoin Core 开发商和 Square Up Europe Ltd.，因使用 BTC 代码而索赔 9110 亿英镑（约合 1 万亿美元）。

The lawsuit alleges that Craig is entitled to compensation for damages incurred due to the defendants' actions. Notably, Craig is representing himself in this case without the assistance of a lawyer.

该诉讼称，克雷格有权就被告行为造成的损失获得赔偿。值得注意的是，克雷格在本案中在没有律师协助的情况下代表自己。

Despite losing numerous cases in the past, including a recent High Court ruling that barred him from claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Craig continues to pursue legal avenues.

尽管克雷格过去输掉了许多官司，包括最近高等法院的一项裁决，禁止他声称自己是中本聪，但克雷格仍在继续寻求法律途径。

He claims that a partnership existed between himself and the Bitcoin Core developers, although the details of this partnership are unclear.

他声称自己和比特币核心开发者之间存在合作关系，尽管这种合作关系的细节尚不清楚。

“I will debate any party officially representing BTC Core, and I stand ready to engage in an open, honest, and—I emphasize—completely honest debate,” Wright said. “If they can prove that BTC Core remains true to the original concept of Bitcoin, as defined by its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, I will drop all litigation immediately.”

赖特表示：“我将与任何正式代表 BTC Core 的政党进行辩论，我随时准备进行公开、诚实的辩论，而且我强调，完全诚实的辩论。” “如果他们能够证明 BTC Core 仍然忠于比特币的原始概念，正如其创建者中本聪所定义的那样，我将立即放弃所有诉讼。”

In a recent tweet, Craig hinted at further legal threats, specifically targeting MicroStrategy and its co-founder Michael Saylor, accusing them of misleading people about Bitcoin's origins and who controls it.

在最近的一条推文中，Craig 暗示了进一步的法律威胁，特别是针对 MicroStrategy 及其联合创始人 Michael Saylor，指责他们在比特币的起源和控制者方面误导人们。

"The lawsuits are about setting the record straight. The rewriting of history didn't start with debates about big blocks or technical disagreements over scalability. It began when I made the decision to stand by the original version of Bitcoin, unaltered, and untouched by the hands of those who wanted to twist it into something it was never meant to be," he said in an extended rant.

“这些诉讼是为了澄清事实。历史的改写并不是从关于大区块的辩论或可扩展性方面的技术分歧开始的。它开始于我决定支持比特币的原始版本，不做改变，不被任何技术所影响。那些想把它扭曲成本来就不该的东西的人的手，”他长篇大论地说道。

According to Craig, the current developers and influencers, including Jameson Lopp and Peter Rizen, tried to hijack Bitcoin by pushing their own agendas. He claims they once supported him but turned against him when he refused to compromise on Bitcoin’s original design.

据克雷格称，当前的开发者和影响者，包括詹姆森·洛普和彼得·里森，试图通过推动自己的议程来劫持比特币。他声称他们曾经支持他，但当他拒绝就比特币的原始设计妥协时，他们转而反对他。

He alleges that they wanted him to endorse changes to the Bitcoin protocol, and when he declined, they “rewrote the narrative” to cast him as the villain.

他声称他们希望他支持对比特币协议的修改，当他拒绝时，他们“重写了叙述”，把他塑造成恶棍。

Despite being widely discredited, Craig's claim that he is Satoshi Nakamoto remains protected by free speech laws.

尽管受到广泛质疑，克雷格声称自己是中本聪的说法仍然受到言论自由法的保护。

The court ruled that while Craig cannot assert this claim in any legal capacity, he can still share his opinions on Bitcoin.

法院裁定，虽然克雷格不能以任何法律身份主张这一主张，但他仍然可以分享他对比特币的看法。

Justice Mellor said that future claims Craig might bring would be “empty rhetoric.” The legal system has limited power to stop someone like this completely.

梅勒法官表示，克雷格未来可能提出的索赔将是“空话”。法律体系的权力有限，无法完全阻止这样的人。

He's legally free to file lawsuits on other matters as long as he provides a legitimate reason, no matter how dubious it seems.

只要他提供正当理由，无论看起来多么可疑，他都可以在法律上自由地就其他事项提起诉讼。

Courts can’t simply shut him down, even though he's been proven to fabricate documents and lie under oath.

即使他已被证明伪造文件并宣誓撒谎，法院也不能简单地禁止他。

He's already said he plans to appeal the court rulings that went against him, prolonging the litigation process indefinitely.

他已经表示，他计划对不利于他的法院裁决提出上诉，从而无限期地延长诉讼程序。

Appeals, in Craig’s hands, are a way to drag out his cases for as long as possible, ensuring that his claims remain in the public eye, even when he keeps losing. How crazy is that?

在克雷格手中，上诉是尽可能拖延案件的一种方式，确保即使他不断败诉，他的主张仍留在公众视野中。这有多疯狂？

The strategy has worked well for him so far too. But Mellor is concerned that Craig's actions would undermine the integrity of the legal system if left unchecked.

到目前为止，这个策略对他来说也很有效。但梅勒担心，如果不加以制止，克雷格的行为将损害法律体系的完整性。