Coinbase要求最高法院拆除針對加密使用者的大規模監視權力

加密交易所Coinbase（NASDAQ：COIN）於4月30日透露，它已向美國最高法院提交了法庭案簡介，敦促法官接受Harperv。 O'Donnell，這一案件挑戰了來自加密貨幣平台內部稅務局的大眾數據收集的案件。

Crypto exchange Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) is urging the Supreme Court to take up a case that could dismantle the IRS's mass surveillance powers and safeguard the future of crypto freedom.

加密交易所Coinbase（NASDAQ：COIN）敦促最高法院提起一個可以拆除IRS大規模監視權並保護加密自由的未來的案件。

In a move that underscores the company's commitment to digital privacy, Coinbase has filed an amicus brief with the high court, urging the justices to hear Harper v. O’Donnell. This case, currently pending with the Supreme Court, challenges the Internal Revenue Service's ability to collect vast amounts of data from the cryptocurrency platform.

為了強調公司對數字隱私的承諾的舉動，Coinbase已向高等法院提交了法庭之友摘要，敦促法官聆聽Harperv。 O'Donnell。目前在最高法院審理的案件對國稅局從加密貨幣平台收集大量數據的能力提出了挑戰。

The history of this case began when the Internal Revenue Service served Coinbase with a sweeping John Doe summons. This summons demanded the production of personal and financial data for over 500,000 customers involved in millions of transactions across three full years. The agency's use of a John Doe summons violates Fourth Amendment protections and abuses the third-party doctrine, a controversial legal theory permitting the government to access data held by third-party service providers without a warrant.

本案的歷史始於國稅局為Coinbase提供大量的約翰·多伊（John Doe）傳票。該傳票要求為超過500,000名參與整整三年的交易的客戶生產個人和財務數據。該機構使用約翰多伊（John Doe）召集了第四修正案的保護並濫用第三方學說，這是一種有爭議的法律理論，允許政府訪問第三方服務提供商沒有逮捕令的數據。

“The third-party doctrine says that any time you voluntarily share info with a third party—you have no reasonable expectation of privacy whatsoever. This applies to email, bank accounts, phone calls, and more. Sadly, lower courts have applied the doctrine broadly to permit the IRS to conduct mass surveillance of crypto users despite the clear protections of the Fourth Amendment,” Grewal stated.

“第三方學說說，每當您自願與第三方分享信息時，您對隱私的期望沒有合理的期望。這適用於電子郵件，銀行帳戶，電話等。可悲的是，下級法院已經廣泛地應用了IRS，以允許對Crypto的使用者對Crypto的使用者進行大規模監測，即使對Crypto的使用者進行了清晰的保護。

Coinbase's brief warns that the lower court's decision effectively endorses indefinite surveillance of blockchain activity. Once authorities match a user's identity with a wallet address, they can track every past and future transaction on the blockchain—a capability that raises serious concerns for digital privacy.

Coinbase的簡短警告說，下級法院的裁決有效地認可了區塊鏈活動的無限監視。一旦當局將用戶的身份與錢包地址相匹配，他們就可以在區塊鏈上跟踪過去和將來的交易，這一功能引起了人們對數字隱私的嚴重關注。

The company's brief argues that such expansive access to user information is not just a cryptocurrency issue. It has broader implications for various institutions and services.

該公司的簡要說，對用戶信息的這種廣泛訪問不僅是加密貨幣問題。它對各種機構和服務具有更廣泛的影響。

“We believe in tax compliance, but this goes far beyond a narrow and tailored request and far beyond crypto. This applies to banks, phone companies, ISPs, email, you name it,” Grewal added.

Grewal補充說：“我們相信稅收合規性，但這遠遠超出了一個狹窄且量身定制的請求，遠遠超出了加密貨幣。這適用於銀行，電話公司，ISP，電子郵件，您為其命名。”

Coinbase is asking the Supreme Court to intervene and set clear boundaries for government intrusion into personal data in the digital age. The company's stance reflects its strong commitment to user privacy and its belief in a balanced approach to taxation and digital rights in the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.input: Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) is asking the Supreme Court to take up a case that could dismantle the IRS's mass surveillance powers and safeguard the future of crypto freedom.

Coinbase要求最高法院干預並設定明確的界限，以使政府入侵數字時代的個人數據。 The company's stance reflects its strong commitment to user privacy and its belief in a balanced approach to taxation and digital rights in the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.input: Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) is asking the Supreme Court to take up a case that could dismantle the IRS's mass surveillance powers and safeguard the future of crypto freedom.

The crypto exchange is urging the justices to hear Harper v. O’Donnell, which challenges the Internal Revenue Service's ability to collect vast amounts of data from the cryptocurrency platform. The case is currently pending with the Supreme Court.

加密交易所敦促法官聆聽Harper訴O'Donnell，這挑戰了國稅局從加密貨幣平台收集大量數據的能力。該案目前正在最高法院審理。

The history of this case began when the Internal Revenue Service served Coinbase with a sweeping John Doe summons. This summons demanded the production of personal and financial data for over 500,000 customers involved in millions of transactions across three full years. The agency's use of a John Doe summons violates Fourth Amendment protections and abuses the third-party doctrine, a controversial legal theory permitting the government to access data held by third-party service providers without a warrant.

本案的歷史始於國稅局為Coinbase提供大量的約翰·多伊（John Doe）傳票。該傳票要求為超過500,000名參與整整三年的交易的客戶生產個人和財務數據。該機構使用約翰多伊（John Doe）召集了第四修正案的保護並濫用第三方學說，這是一種有爭議的法律理論，允許政府訪問第三方服務提供商沒有逮捕令的數據。

“The third-party doctrine says that any time you voluntarily share info with a third party—you have no reasonable expectation of privacy whatsoever. This applies to email, bank accounts, phone calls, and more. Sadly, lower courts have applied the doctrine broadly to permit the IRS to conduct mass surveillance of crypto users despite the clear protections of the Fourth Amendment. Today Coinbase filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to right this wrong.

“第三方學說說，每當您自願與第三方分享信息時，您對隱私的期望沒有合理的期望。這適用於電子郵件，銀行帳戶，電話等。可悲的是，下層法庭已將IRS廣泛地應用於IRS的大規模監視，儘管對四號的批量保護措施進行了清晰的保護措施。糾正這個錯誤。

We know how painful the overreach of the doctrine can be. In 2017 the IRS asked for the financial data of more than 500K Coinbase customers. We vigorously pushed back against this government overreach on behalf of our customers, and the IRS substantially narrowed it. But too often this type of fishing expedition is allowed by the courts.

我們知道該學說的過度痛苦會多麼痛苦。 2017年，美國國稅局（IRS）要求提供超過50萬個Coinbase客戶的財務數據。我們大力代表客戶反對這個政府，而國稅局大大縮小了這一範圍。但是法院允許這種類型的捕魚探險。

As we explain here, you should have the same right to privacy for your inbox or account as you have for a letter in your mailbox.

正如我們在這裡解釋的那樣，您應該擁有與郵箱中的字母相同的收件箱或帳戶隱私權。

Coinbase is asking the Supreme Court to restore meaningful limits on government access to personal data in the digital era. The company warns that unchecked use of the third-party doctrine could erase privacy expectations across online services.

Coinbase要求最高法院在數字時代恢復政府獲取個人數據的有意義的限制。該公司警告說，未經檢查的第三方學說可以消除在線服務之間的隱私期望。

"The lower court's decision in this case endorses indefinite surveillance of activity on public blockchains. If the government can identify a user's wallet address and match it to their identity, they can then see every past, present, and future transaction on the blockchain with complete clarity, setting the stage for an extreme invasion of privacy," the brief stated.

“在這種情況下，下級法院的裁決認可對公共區塊鏈活動的無限監視。如果政府可以確定用戶的錢包地址並將其與他們的身份相匹配，那麼他們就可以看到所有的過去，現在和將來在區塊鏈上完全清晰的交易，為極端侵害的私人侵害樹立舞台，”簡短說明。 ”

Coinbase's brief cites the Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Carpenter v. United States to argue that outdated legal precedents from the 1970s do not justify modern surveillance technologies and practices.

Coinbase的摘要列舉了最高法院在Carpenter訴美國案中的2018年裁決，認為1970年代的過時法律先例沒有證明現代監視技術和實踐的合理性。

The company's involvement in this case highlights its commitment to user privacy and its efforts to engage with issues arising from the

該公司參與在這種情況下，強調了其對用戶隱私的承諾以及與涉及因