Coinbase要求最高法院拆除针对加密使用者的大规模监视权力

加密交易所Coinbase（NASDAQ：COIN）于4月30日透露，它已向美国最高法院提交了法庭案简介，敦促法官接受Harperv。O'Donnell，这一案件挑战了来自加密货币平台内部税务局的大众数据收集的案件。

Crypto exchange Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) is urging the Supreme Court to take up a case that could dismantle the IRS's mass surveillance powers and safeguard the future of crypto freedom.

加密交易所Coinbase（NASDAQ：COIN）敦促最高法院提起一个可以拆除IRS大规模监视权并保护加密自由的未来的案件。

In a move that underscores the company's commitment to digital privacy, Coinbase has filed an amicus brief with the high court, urging the justices to hear Harper v. O’Donnell. This case, currently pending with the Supreme Court, challenges the Internal Revenue Service's ability to collect vast amounts of data from the cryptocurrency platform.

为了强调公司对数字隐私的承诺的举动，Coinbase已向高等法院提交了法庭之友摘要，敦促法官聆听Harperv。O'Donnell。目前在最高法院审理的案件对国税局从加密货币平台收集大量数据的能力提出了挑战。

The history of this case began when the Internal Revenue Service served Coinbase with a sweeping John Doe summons. This summons demanded the production of personal and financial data for over 500,000 customers involved in millions of transactions across three full years. The agency's use of a John Doe summons violates Fourth Amendment protections and abuses the third-party doctrine, a controversial legal theory permitting the government to access data held by third-party service providers without a warrant.

本案的历史始于国税局为Coinbase提供大量的约翰·多伊（John Doe）传票。该传票要求为超过500,000名参与整整三年的交易的客户生产个人和财务数据。该机构使用约翰多伊（John Doe）召集了第四修正案的保护并滥用第三方学说，这是一种有争议的法律理论，允许政府访问第三方服务提供商没有逮捕令的数据。

“The third-party doctrine says that any time you voluntarily share info with a third party—you have no reasonable expectation of privacy whatsoever. This applies to email, bank accounts, phone calls, and more. Sadly, lower courts have applied the doctrine broadly to permit the IRS to conduct mass surveillance of crypto users despite the clear protections of the Fourth Amendment,” Grewal stated.

“第三方学说说，每当您自愿与第三方分享信息时，您对隐私的期望没有合理的期望。这适用于电子邮件，银行帐户，电话等。可悲的是，下级法院已经广泛地应用了IRS，以允许对Crypto的使用者对Crypto的使用者进行大规模监测，即使对Crypto的使用者进行了清晰的保护。

Coinbase's brief warns that the lower court's decision effectively endorses indefinite surveillance of blockchain activity. Once authorities match a user's identity with a wallet address, they can track every past and future transaction on the blockchain—a capability that raises serious concerns for digital privacy.

Coinbase的简短警告说，下级法院的裁决有效地认可了区块链活动的无限监视。一旦当局将用户的身份与钱包地址相匹配，他们就可以在区块链上跟踪过去和将来的交易，这一功能引起了人们对数字隐私的严重关注。

The company's brief argues that such expansive access to user information is not just a cryptocurrency issue. It has broader implications for various institutions and services.

该公司的简要说，对用户信息的这种广泛访问不仅是加密货币问题。它对各种机构和服务具有更广泛的影响。

“We believe in tax compliance, but this goes far beyond a narrow and tailored request and far beyond crypto. This applies to banks, phone companies, ISPs, email, you name it,” Grewal added.

Grewal补充说：“我们相信税收合规性，但这远远超出了一个狭窄且量身定制的请求，远远超出了加密货币。这适用于银行，电话公司，ISP，电子邮件，您为其命名。”

Coinbase is asking the Supreme Court to intervene and set clear boundaries for government intrusion into personal data in the digital age. The company's stance reflects its strong commitment to user privacy and its belief in a balanced approach to taxation and digital rights in the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.input: Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) is asking the Supreme Court to take up a case that could dismantle the IRS's mass surveillance powers and safeguard the future of crypto freedom.

Coinbase要求最高法院干预并设定明确的界限，以使政府入侵数字时代的个人数据。 The company's stance reflects its strong commitment to user privacy and its belief in a balanced approach to taxation and digital rights in the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.input: Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) is asking the Supreme Court to take up a case that could dismantle the IRS's mass surveillance powers and safeguard the future of crypto freedom.

The crypto exchange is urging the justices to hear Harper v. O’Donnell, which challenges the Internal Revenue Service's ability to collect vast amounts of data from the cryptocurrency platform. The case is currently pending with the Supreme Court.

加密交易所敦促法官聆听Harper诉O'Donnell，这挑战了国税局从加密货币平台收集大量数据的能力。该案目前正在最高法院审理。

The history of this case began when the Internal Revenue Service served Coinbase with a sweeping John Doe summons. This summons demanded the production of personal and financial data for over 500,000 customers involved in millions of transactions across three full years. The agency's use of a John Doe summons violates Fourth Amendment protections and abuses the third-party doctrine, a controversial legal theory permitting the government to access data held by third-party service providers without a warrant.

本案的历史始于国税局为Coinbase提供大量的约翰·多伊（John Doe）传票。该传票要求为超过500,000名参与整整三年的交易的客户生产个人和财务数据。该机构使用约翰多伊（John Doe）召集了第四修正案的保护并滥用第三方学说，这是一种有争议的法律理论，允许政府访问第三方服务提供商没有逮捕令的数据。

“The third-party doctrine says that any time you voluntarily share info with a third party—you have no reasonable expectation of privacy whatsoever. This applies to email, bank accounts, phone calls, and more. Sadly, lower courts have applied the doctrine broadly to permit the IRS to conduct mass surveillance of crypto users despite the clear protections of the Fourth Amendment. Today Coinbase filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to right this wrong.

“第三方学说说，每当您自愿与第三方分享信息时，您对隐私的期望没有合理的期望。这适用于电子邮件，银行帐户，电话等。可悲的是，下层法庭已将IRS广泛地应用于IRS的大规模监视，尽管对四号的批量保护措施进行了清晰的保护措施。纠正这个错误。

We know how painful the overreach of the doctrine can be. In 2017 the IRS asked for the financial data of more than 500K Coinbase customers. We vigorously pushed back against this government overreach on behalf of our customers, and the IRS substantially narrowed it. But too often this type of fishing expedition is allowed by the courts.

我们知道该学说的过度痛苦会多么痛苦。 2017年，美国国税局（IRS）要求提供超过50万个Coinbase客户的财务数据。我们大力代表客户反对这个政府，而国税局大大缩小了这一范围。但是法院允许这种类型的捕鱼探险。

As we explain here, you should have the same right to privacy for your inbox or account as you have for a letter in your mailbox.

正如我们在这里解释的那样，您应该拥有与邮箱中的字母相同的收件箱或帐户隐私权。

Coinbase is asking the Supreme Court to restore meaningful limits on government access to personal data in the digital era. The company warns that unchecked use of the third-party doctrine could erase privacy expectations across online services.

Coinbase要求最高法院在数字时代恢复政府获取个人数据的有意义的限制。该公司警告说，未经检查的第三方学说可以消除在线服务之间的隐私期望。

"The lower court's decision in this case endorses indefinite surveillance of activity on public blockchains. If the government can identify a user's wallet address and match it to their identity, they can then see every past, present, and future transaction on the blockchain with complete clarity, setting the stage for an extreme invasion of privacy," the brief stated.

“在这种情况下，下级法院的裁决认可对公共区块链活动的无限监视。如果政府可以确定用户的钱包地址并将其与他们的身份相匹配，那么他们就可以看到所有的过去，现在和将来在区块链上完全清晰的交易，为极端侵害的私人侵害树立舞台，”简短说明。”

Coinbase's brief cites the Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Carpenter v. United States to argue that outdated legal precedents from the 1970s do not justify modern surveillance technologies and practices.

Coinbase的摘要列举了最高法院在Carpenter诉美国案中的2018年裁决，认为1970年代的过时法律先例没有证明现代监视技术和实践的合理性。

The company's involvement in this case highlights its commitment to user privacy and its efforts to engage with issues arising from the

该公司参与在这种情况下，强调了其对用户隐私的承诺以及与涉及因