Coinbase在兩次主要公告，複雜的數據洩露和SEC調查後，其股票下跌了7.2％，Coinbase面臨著動蕩的一天

在兩次主要公告，複雜的數據洩露和重新出現的SEC調查之後，Coinbase面臨動蕩的一天，其股票下跌了7.2％。

Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) faced a turbulent day as its stock slid 7.2% following two major announcements: a sophisticated data breach and a reemerging SEC investigation.

Coinbase（NASDAQ：COIN）面臨動蕩的一天，其股票在兩次主要公告之後下跌7.2％：複雜的數據洩露和重新出現的SEC調查。

While this double blow triggered alarm among investors, top analysts argue that the market’s response may be too harsh.

儘管這種雙重打擊引發了投資者的警報，但頂級分析師認為，市場的反應可能太苛刻了。

According to Barclays and Oppenheimer, the Coinbase stock drop doesn’t accurately reflect the isolated nature of the events.

根據巴克萊（Barclays）和奧本海默（Oppenheimer）的說法，共同基礎的股票下降並不能準確反映事件的孤立性質。

Barclays called the reaction “overblown,” highlighting that the breach did not stem from system flaws or blockchain vulnerabilities. Instead, human factors were at play, specifically, a case of customer support agents being bribed to leak user information.

巴克萊稱該反應為“誇張”，這強調了這種漏洞並非源於系統缺陷或區塊鏈漏洞。取而代之的是，人為因素正在起作用，特別是，客戶支持代理商被賄賂以洩漏用戶信息。

What Really Happened in the Coinbase Data Breach?

Coinbase數據洩露中確實發生了什麼？

The recent data breach at Coinbase was not your typical cyber breach. The hackers didn’t compromise systems or exploit a vulnerability, but instead, went with social engineering. The scammers bribed customer service representatives overseas to give them user details of customers that consisted of names, addresses and masked Social Security numbers. With the leaked information in hand, they were able to trick Users to which they intended to sending crypto assets to scammers.

Coinbase最近的數據洩露並不是您典型的網絡漏洞。黑客沒有妥協系統或利用脆弱性，而是與社會工程有關。騙子賄賂了海外的客戶服務代表，為他們提供由姓名，地址和掩蓋社會安全號碼組成的客戶的用戶詳細信息。掌握了洩漏的信息，他們能夠欺騙他們打算將加密資產發送給騙子的用戶。

Although less than 1% of transacting users were impacted by the breach, Coinbase did not pay the $20 million ransom by the hackers, as per the last publicised communications. Instead, the affected users will be fully reimbursed by Coinbase and have reported working with law enforcement to identify the perpetrators.

儘管不到1％的交易用戶受到了違規影響，但根據上次公開的通信，Coinbase並未支付黑客的2000萬美元贖金。取而代之的是，受影響的用戶將由Coinbase充分報銷，並報告與執法部門合作以識別肇事者。

Even though this was not a good a breach, it’s not good, as there was no compromise to any passwords, private keys, or funds in the Coinbase accounts, which, analysts maintain, makes it reputation over the breach being systemic, and in addition, Coinbase’s reasonable responsiveness limited unnecessarily further degradation of the breach.

即使這不是一個很好的違規行為，但這也不是好的，因為在Coinbase帳戶中沒有任何密碼，私鑰或資金妥協，分析師維持的，在違規方面保持其聲譽，此外，Coinbase的合理響應能力有限地有限地進一步取得了不必要的侵犯。

Is the SEC Probe a Major Concern?

SEC調查是主要問題嗎？

The second blow came in the form of a Coinbase SEC probe, which unfolded amid heightened scrutiny over a metric used in the company’s 2021 IPO: the “100 million verified users” figure.

第二次打擊以Coinbase SEC探測的形式出現，該探針在對公司2021 IPO中使用的度量標準的審查中進行了更高的審查：“ 1億經驗證的用戶”數字。

According to Coinbase’s legal team, this investigation has been ongoing since the Biden administration and is not connected to any current disclosures or performance issues.

根據Coinbase的法律團隊的說法，自拜登政府以來，這項調查一直在進行，並且與當前的任何披露或績效問題無關。

Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, stated that the company stopped reporting this metric more than two years ago and that the investigation should not be dragging on.

Coinbase的首席法律官Paul Grewal表示，該公司在兩年多以前停止報告該指標，調查不應拖延。

Analysts from Benchmark and other firms largely agree that the probe is more of a distraction than a major setback for Coinbase.

基準和其他公司的分析師在很大程度上同意，探測器更多的是分散注意力，而不是對Coinbase的重大挫折。

As+")

AS+”）