無聊的Ape Brouhaha：Yuga Labs的900萬美元判決被推翻了！

Yuga Labs在無聊的APE遊艇俱樂部商標案中的勝利被翻轉了！法院說：“舉起，不是那麼快！” BAYC和NFT世界的下一步是什麼？

Bored Ape Brouhaha: Yuga Labs' $9M Judgment Overturned!

無聊的Ape Brouhaha：Yuga Labs的900萬美元判決被推翻了！

Hold on to your hats, NFT enthusiasts! The world of Bored Apes just got a whole lot more interesting. Yuga Labs, the big cheese behind the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC), saw a $9 million trademark infringement win against Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen overturned. Buckle up; it's trial time!

抓住帽子，NFT愛好者！無聊的猿類世界變得更加有趣。 Yuga Labs是無聊的APE遊艇俱樂部（BAYC）背後的大奶酪，他對萊德·里普斯（Ryder Ripps）和傑里米·卡恩（Jeremy Cahen）的侵犯擊敗了900萬美元的侵犯。扣是試用時間！

The Ape-ocalypse: A Quick Recap

猿 - 尾型：快速回顧

Back in 2022, Yuga Labs sued Ripps and Cahen, claiming their "Ryder Ripps Bored Ape Yacht Club" NFTs were copycats. Yuga said these rivals were not just mimicking the name and style but intentionally misleading buyers to profit from the real BAYC's fame. Ripps, on the other hand, said his collection was art with a message, critiquing what he saw as problematic imagery in Yuga's originals.

早在2022年，Yuga Labs就起訴Ripps和Cahen，聲稱他們的“ Ryder Ripps無聊的Ape Yacht Club” NFT是模仿者。尤加（Yuga）說，這些競爭對手不僅在模仿名字和時尚，而且有意誤導買家，從皇家灣的名聲中獲利。另一方面，里普斯（Ripps）說，他的收藏是一條信息，批評了他在尤加（Yuga）的原始作品中認為有問題的圖像。

Judgment Day... Delayed!

審判日...延遲！

Initially, a California court sided with Yuga, awarding them $1.6 million in damages, which later ballooned to $9 million. But, plot twist! The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals just tossed that award out, saying the case needs a full trial. Why? Because the court thinks Yuga hasn't quite proved that people would actually confuse Ripps' project with the real BAYC.

最初，加利福尼亞州的法院與尤加（Yuga）一起，判給他們160萬美元的賠償金，後來激增至900萬美元。但是，情節扭曲！第九巡迴上訴法院剛剛拋出了該裁決，稱此案需要進行全面審判。為什麼？因為法院認為Yuga並沒有完全證明人們實際上會將Ripps的項目與Real Bayc混淆。

NFTs as 'Goods': A Silver Lining for Yuga

NFT作為“商品”：Yuga的一線希望

It's not all bad news for Yuga. The court did agree that NFTs can be considered "goods" under trademark law. This is a pretty big deal because it could make it easier for NFT creators to protect their intellectual property in the future. Think of it as a legal shield for your digital assets!

對於Yuga來說，這並不是所有的壞消息。法院確實同意，根據商標法可以將NFT視為“商品”。這是一件大事，因為它可以使NFT創建者更容易在將來保護其知識產權。將其視為您的數字資產的合法盾牌！

But Wait, There's More! The First Amendment Angle

但是等等，還有更多！第一個修正角度

Ripps tried to argue that his work was protected speech under the First Amendment, but the court wasn't buying it. They also nixed his claim of "nominative fair use," meaning he couldn't just use Yuga's trademarks willy-nilly. Ouch!

里普斯（Ripps）試圖辯稱，他的作品是在《第一修正案》中受到保護的演講，但法院沒有購買。他們還忽略了他關於“名義合理使用”的主張，這意味著他不能只使用Yuga的商標。哎喲!

What's Next? Back to Court!

接下來是什麼？回到法庭！

So, what happens now? The case goes back to the district court in California. A jury will have to decide whether Ripps' NFTs really did infringe on Yuga Labs' trademarks. Expect arguments about brand confusion, artistic intent, and whether this was all just a big money grab.

那麼，現在會發生什麼？該案返回加利福尼亞州地方法院。陪審團將不得不決定Ripps的NFT是否確實侵犯了Yuga Labs的商標。期望關於品牌混亂，藝術意圖以及這是否只是一筆大錢的爭論。

Greg Solano Weighs In

格雷格·索拉諾（Greg Solano）

Yuga Labs co-founder Greg Solano isn't backing down. He hopped on X to say they're going to "finish the fight" and that the ruling confirms BAYC NFTs are trademarks. Sounds like this ape saga is far from over!

Yuga Labs聯合創始人Greg Solano並沒有退縮。他跳上X，說他們將要“結束戰鬥”，並確認Bayc NFT是商標。聽起來這個猿人傳奇還遠遠沒有結束！

The Big Picture: NFTs and the Law

大局：NFTS與法律

This whole situation highlights how tricky it is to apply old-school trademark laws to newfangled digital stuff like NFTs. Courts are still figuring out how to balance artistic expression with intellectual property rights. One thing's clear: this case is a major milestone in NFT legal history.

在整個情況下，將老式商標法應用於NFT等新數字物品是多麼棘手。法院仍在弄清楚如何平衡藝術表達與知識產權。一件事很明顯：此案是NFT法律曆史上的主要里程碑。

My Two Satoshis

我的兩個satoshis

While Yuga Labs may not have secured an immediate win, the court's recognition of NFTs as trademarkable goods is a significant step forward for the entire NFT community. It provides a framework for creators to protect their work and could deter blatant copycats. However, it also underscores the importance of proving actual consumer confusion in infringement cases. This decision forces creators to ensure their branding is not just similar but also likely to deceive the average consumer. A balance is needed to foster innovation while protecting intellectual property rights.

儘管Yuga Labs可能沒有立即獲得勝利，但法院對NFT作為商標商品的認可是整個NFT社區的重要一步。它為創作者提供了一個保護自己的作品的框架，並可以阻止公然的模仿者。但是，這也強調了證明在侵權案件中證明實際消費者混亂的重要性。該決策迫使創建者確保其品牌不僅相似，而且很可能欺騙普通消費者。需要平衡來促進創新，同時保護知識產權。

The Bottom Line

底線

The legal wrangling over Bored Apes is a wild ride, and it's not over yet. The future of NFTs and trademark law is still being written, one court case at a time. Stay tuned, folks! This ape opera is bound to have more twists and turns than a crypto chart during a bull run. One thing is for sure, things just got interesting, again!

無聊的猿猴的法律爭吵是一次瘋狂的旅程，還沒有結束。 NFTS和商標法的未來仍在寫作，一次是法院案件。請繼續關注，伙計們！在公牛奔跑中，這部猿人的猿類肯定會比加密圖表更具曲折。可以肯定的是，事情又變得有趣了！