无聊的Ape Brouhaha：Yuga Labs的900万美元判决被推翻了！

Yuga Labs在无聊的APE游艇俱乐部商标案中的胜利被翻转了！法院说：“举起，不是那么快！” BAYC和NFT世界的下一步是什么？

Bored Ape Brouhaha: Yuga Labs' $9M Judgment Overturned!

无聊的Ape Brouhaha：Yuga Labs的900万美元判决被推翻了！

Hold on to your hats, NFT enthusiasts! The world of Bored Apes just got a whole lot more interesting. Yuga Labs, the big cheese behind the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC), saw a $9 million trademark infringement win against Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen overturned. Buckle up; it's trial time!

抓住帽子，NFT爱好者！无聊的猿类世界变得更加有趣。 Yuga Labs是无聊的APE游艇俱乐部（BAYC）背后的大奶酪，他对莱德·里普斯（Ryder Ripps）和杰里米·卡恩（Jeremy Cahen）的侵犯击败了900万美元的侵犯。扣是试用时间！

The Ape-ocalypse: A Quick Recap

猿 - 尾型：快速回顾

Back in 2022, Yuga Labs sued Ripps and Cahen, claiming their "Ryder Ripps Bored Ape Yacht Club" NFTs were copycats. Yuga said these rivals were not just mimicking the name and style but intentionally misleading buyers to profit from the real BAYC's fame. Ripps, on the other hand, said his collection was art with a message, critiquing what he saw as problematic imagery in Yuga's originals.

早在2022年，Yuga Labs就起诉Ripps和Cahen，声称他们的“ Ryder Ripps无聊的Ape Yacht Club” NFT是模仿者。尤加（Yuga）说，这些竞争对手不仅在模仿名字和时尚，而且有意误导买家，从皇家湾的名声中获利。另一方面，里普斯（Ripps）说，他的收藏是一条信息，批评了他在尤加（Yuga）的原始作品中认为有问题的图像。

Judgment Day... Delayed!

审判日...延迟！

Initially, a California court sided with Yuga, awarding them $1.6 million in damages, which later ballooned to $9 million. But, plot twist! The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals just tossed that award out, saying the case needs a full trial. Why? Because the court thinks Yuga hasn't quite proved that people would actually confuse Ripps' project with the real BAYC.

最初，加利福尼亚州的法院与尤加（Yuga）一起，判给他们160万美元的赔偿金，后来激增至900万美元。但是，情节扭曲！第九巡回上诉法院刚刚抛出了该裁决，称此案需要进行全面审判。为什么？因为法院认为Yuga并没有完全证明人们实际上会将Ripps的项目与Real Bayc混淆。

NFTs as 'Goods': A Silver Lining for Yuga

NFT作为“商品”：Yuga的一线希望

It's not all bad news for Yuga. The court did agree that NFTs can be considered "goods" under trademark law. This is a pretty big deal because it could make it easier for NFT creators to protect their intellectual property in the future. Think of it as a legal shield for your digital assets!

对于Yuga来说，这并不是所有的坏消息。法院确实同意，根据商标法可以将NFT视为“商品”。这是一件大事，因为它可以使NFT创建者更容易在将来保护其知识产权。将其视为您的数字资产的合法盾牌！

But Wait, There's More! The First Amendment Angle

但是等等，还有更多！第一个修正角度

Ripps tried to argue that his work was protected speech under the First Amendment, but the court wasn't buying it. They also nixed his claim of "nominative fair use," meaning he couldn't just use Yuga's trademarks willy-nilly. Ouch!

里普斯（Ripps）试图辩称，他的作品是在《第一修正案》中受到保护的演讲，但法院没有购买。他们还忽略了他关于“名义合理使用”的主张，这意味着他不能只使用Yuga的商标。哎哟!

What's Next? Back to Court!

接下来是什么？回到法庭！

So, what happens now? The case goes back to the district court in California. A jury will have to decide whether Ripps' NFTs really did infringe on Yuga Labs' trademarks. Expect arguments about brand confusion, artistic intent, and whether this was all just a big money grab.

那么，现在会发生什么？该案返回加利福尼亚州地方法院。陪审团将不得不决定Ripps的NFT是否确实侵犯了Yuga Labs的商标。期望关于品牌混乱，艺术意图以及这是否只是一笔大钱的争论。

Greg Solano Weighs In

格雷格·索拉诺（Greg Solano）

Yuga Labs co-founder Greg Solano isn't backing down. He hopped on X to say they're going to "finish the fight" and that the ruling confirms BAYC NFTs are trademarks. Sounds like this ape saga is far from over!

Yuga Labs联合创始人Greg Solano并没有退缩。他跳上X，说他们将要“结束战斗”，并确认Bayc NFT是商标。听起来这个猿人传奇还远远没有结束！

The Big Picture: NFTs and the Law

大局：NFTS与法律

This whole situation highlights how tricky it is to apply old-school trademark laws to newfangled digital stuff like NFTs. Courts are still figuring out how to balance artistic expression with intellectual property rights. One thing's clear: this case is a major milestone in NFT legal history.

在整个情况下，将老式商标法应用于NFT等新数字物品是多么棘手。法院仍在弄清楚如何平衡艺术表达与知识产权。一件事很明显：此案是NFT法律历史上的主要里程碑。

My Two Satoshis

我的两个satoshis

While Yuga Labs may not have secured an immediate win, the court's recognition of NFTs as trademarkable goods is a significant step forward for the entire NFT community. It provides a framework for creators to protect their work and could deter blatant copycats. However, it also underscores the importance of proving actual consumer confusion in infringement cases. This decision forces creators to ensure their branding is not just similar but also likely to deceive the average consumer. A balance is needed to foster innovation while protecting intellectual property rights.

尽管Yuga Labs可能没有立即获得胜利，但法院对NFT作为商标商品的认可是整个NFT社区的重要一步。它为创作者提供了一个保护自己的作品的框架，并可以阻止公然的模仿者。但是，这也强调了证明在侵权案件中证明实际消费者混乱的重要性。该决策迫使创建者确保其品牌不仅相似，而且很可能欺骗普通消费者。需要平衡来促进创新，同时保护知识产权。

The Bottom Line

底线

The legal wrangling over Bored Apes is a wild ride, and it's not over yet. The future of NFTs and trademark law is still being written, one court case at a time. Stay tuned, folks! This ape opera is bound to have more twists and turns than a crypto chart during a bull run. One thing is for sure, things just got interesting, again!

无聊的猿猴的法律争吵是一次疯狂的旅程，还没有结束。 NFTS和商标法的未来仍在写作，一次是法院案件。请继续关注，伙计们！在公牛奔跑中，这部猿人的猿类肯定会比加密图表更具曲折。可以肯定的是，事情又变得有趣了！