Market Cap: $3.8601T -0.240%
Volume(24h): $201.6346B -2.360%
  • Market Cap: $3.8601T -0.240%
  • Volume(24h): $201.6346B -2.360%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.8601T -0.240%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$116533.928400 USD

-2.08%

ethereum
ethereum

$3625.487129 USD

-0.71%

xrp
xrp

$3.090958 USD

-3.61%

tether
tether

$1.000499 USD

0.01%

bnb
bnb

$761.565506 USD

-2.75%

solana
solana

$179.985209 USD

-5.92%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999938 USD

0.00%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.226524 USD

-7.37%

tron
tron

$0.312482 USD

0.65%

cardano
cardano

$0.800592 USD

-2.49%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$41.584924 USD

-5.86%

stellar
stellar

$0.418925 USD

-3.17%

sui
sui

$3.638506 USD

-3.44%

chainlink
chainlink

$17.535026 USD

-4.41%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$523.015814 USD

0.58%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Bored Ape Brouhaha: Yuga Labs' $9M Judgment Overturned!

Jul 24, 2025 at 01:46 pm

Yuga Labs' victory in the Bored Ape Yacht Club trademark case gets flipped! A court says, 'Hold up, not so fast!' What's next for BAYC and the NFT world?

Bored Ape Brouhaha: Yuga Labs' $9M Judgment Overturned!

Bored Ape Brouhaha: Yuga Labs' $9M Judgment Overturned!

Hold on to your hats, NFT enthusiasts! The world of Bored Apes just got a whole lot more interesting. Yuga Labs, the big cheese behind the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC), saw a $9 million trademark infringement win against Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen overturned. Buckle up; it's trial time!

The Ape-ocalypse: A Quick Recap

Back in 2022, Yuga Labs sued Ripps and Cahen, claiming their "Ryder Ripps Bored Ape Yacht Club" NFTs were copycats. Yuga said these rivals were not just mimicking the name and style but intentionally misleading buyers to profit from the real BAYC's fame. Ripps, on the other hand, said his collection was art with a message, critiquing what he saw as problematic imagery in Yuga's originals.

Judgment Day... Delayed!

Initially, a California court sided with Yuga, awarding them $1.6 million in damages, which later ballooned to $9 million. But, plot twist! The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals just tossed that award out, saying the case needs a full trial. Why? Because the court thinks Yuga hasn't quite proved that people would actually confuse Ripps' project with the real BAYC.

NFTs as 'Goods': A Silver Lining for Yuga

It's not all bad news for Yuga. The court did agree that NFTs can be considered "goods" under trademark law. This is a pretty big deal because it could make it easier for NFT creators to protect their intellectual property in the future. Think of it as a legal shield for your digital assets!

But Wait, There's More! The First Amendment Angle

Ripps tried to argue that his work was protected speech under the First Amendment, but the court wasn't buying it. They also nixed his claim of "nominative fair use," meaning he couldn't just use Yuga's trademarks willy-nilly. Ouch!

What's Next? Back to Court!

So, what happens now? The case goes back to the district court in California. A jury will have to decide whether Ripps' NFTs really did infringe on Yuga Labs' trademarks. Expect arguments about brand confusion, artistic intent, and whether this was all just a big money grab.

Greg Solano Weighs In

Yuga Labs co-founder Greg Solano isn't backing down. He hopped on X to say they're going to "finish the fight" and that the ruling confirms BAYC NFTs are trademarks. Sounds like this ape saga is far from over!

The Big Picture: NFTs and the Law

This whole situation highlights how tricky it is to apply old-school trademark laws to newfangled digital stuff like NFTs. Courts are still figuring out how to balance artistic expression with intellectual property rights. One thing's clear: this case is a major milestone in NFT legal history.

My Two Satoshis

While Yuga Labs may not have secured an immediate win, the court's recognition of NFTs as trademarkable goods is a significant step forward for the entire NFT community. It provides a framework for creators to protect their work and could deter blatant copycats. However, it also underscores the importance of proving actual consumer confusion in infringement cases. This decision forces creators to ensure their branding is not just similar but also likely to deceive the average consumer. A balance is needed to foster innovation while protecting intellectual property rights.

The Bottom Line

The legal wrangling over Bored Apes is a wild ride, and it's not over yet. The future of NFTs and trademark law is still being written, one court case at a time. Stay tuned, folks! This ape opera is bound to have more twists and turns than a crypto chart during a bull run. One thing is for sure, things just got interesting, again!

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Jul 25, 2025