在SUI團隊的直接干預之後，更多的區塊鏈專家加入了權力下放辯論

在SUI團隊的直接干預之後，更多的區塊鏈專家正在加入權力下放辯論。

Monad co-founder James Hunsaker has responded to earlier comments from Anatoly Yakovenko regarding a blockchain solution being decentralized only if a minority group cannot unilaterally block the majority from making changes or functioning.

Monad聯合創始人James Hunsaker回應了Anatoly Yakovenko的早期評論，只有在少數群體不能單方面阻止大多數人進行更改或運作時，只有在少數群體無法單方面阻止大多數人進行分散的情況下進行了分散。

Hunsaker highlighted the complexities associated with forking blockchain solutions as a minority group, classifying such groups in terms of stakes in Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchains. According to Hunsaker, stakes concentrate highly among a small group of insiders in most chains. Hence, just forking a chain may not be enough for the minority groups, except they are good at “social shaming.”

Hunsaker強調了與分叉區塊鏈解決方案作為少數群體群體相關的複雜性，並將此類群體分類為股份證明（POS）區塊鏈。根據亨斯克（Hunsaker）的說法，大多數鏈條中的賭注高度集中在一小群內部人群中。因此，僅僅為少數群體分叉可能還不夠，只是他們擅長“社會羞辱”。

This continues a discussion between Yakovenko and Hunsaker, both prominent blockchain experts, who have been exchanging views on the PoS blockchain governance system. Yakovenko stated that most forks don’t work because the majority is doing the right thing for the users, not because the minority is powerless to do the right thing.

這繼續討論Yakovenko和Hunsaker，這都是著名的區塊鏈專家，他們一直在交換對POS區塊鏈治理體系的看法。 Yakovenko表示，大多數叉子不起作用，因為大多數人對用戶做正確的事情，而不是因為少數人無能為力做正確的事情。

Moreover, Yakovenko put a lot of weight on the role of users in blockchain networks. According to Yakovenko, it’s the users who ultimately hold all the demands, not necessarily just those with the biggest stakes. He also believes in user coordination since user demand is power-law distributed, meaning a vocal and coordinated user base can influence the chain more than a small group with a large stake. In response, Hunsaker noted how external factors can influence users’ decisions. For instance, he thinks users will stick with forks that Circle and Tether will honor.

此外，Yakovenko對用戶在區塊鍊網絡中的作用施加了很大的重視。根據Yakovenko的說法，最終持有所有要求的用戶，不一定只是那些擁有最大股份的用戶。他還相信用戶協調，因為用戶需求是分配了冪律，這意味著聲音和協調的用戶群可以影響鏈，而不是一個較大的股份的小組。作為回應，Hunsaker指出了外部因素如何影響用戶的決定。例如，他認為用戶將堅持圓形和繫繩將尊重的叉子。

It’s worth noting that this discussion, brought on after the SUI team’s decisive actions following the CETUS DEX multi-million dollar exploit and the actions of the majority of the community, is highlighting one of blockchain’s most fundamental, yet often fuzzily defined, elements: decentralization.

值得注意的是，在SUI團隊在CETUS DEX數百萬美元的剝削之後的決定性行動以及大多數社區的行動之後，進行了這項討論，這突顯了區塊鏈最基本最基本，最基本但經常定義的元素之一，“元素：德境”。

Discussions about what true blockchain decentralization means, and what tradeoffs are acceptable, might seem academic until a real-world crisis hits, like the recent CETUS DEX hack. This is where teams are forced to make nearly impossible choices, juggling short-term user protection against governance ethics in a lawless, yet interconnected, online world.

關於真正的區塊鏈權力下放的含義以及哪些可以接受的權衡的討論在現實世界中的危機爆發之前似乎是學術性的，例如最近的Cetus Dex Hack。在這裡，團隊被迫做出幾乎不可能的選擇，在無法法律但相互聯繫的在線世界中兼顧短期用戶保護對治理倫理的影響。

Such debates could continue or resurface under similar circumstances until the blockchain community reaches a consensus or strikes an acceptable balance between governance and security.

在類似情況下，這種辯論可以繼續或重新出現，直到區塊鏈社區達成共識或達到治理和安全之間的可接受平衡為止。