在SUI团队的直接干预之后，更多的区块链专家加入了权力下放辩论

在SUI团队的直接干预之后，更多的区块链专家正在加入权力下放辩论。

Monad co-founder James Hunsaker has responded to earlier comments from Anatoly Yakovenko regarding a blockchain solution being decentralized only if a minority group cannot unilaterally block the majority from making changes or functioning.

Monad联合创始人James Hunsaker回应了Anatoly Yakovenko的早期评论，只有在少数群体不能单方面阻止大多数人进行更改或运作时，只有在少数群体无法单方面阻止大多数人进行分散的情况下进行了分散。

Hunsaker highlighted the complexities associated with forking blockchain solutions as a minority group, classifying such groups in terms of stakes in Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchains. According to Hunsaker, stakes concentrate highly among a small group of insiders in most chains. Hence, just forking a chain may not be enough for the minority groups, except they are good at “social shaming.”

Hunsaker强调了与分叉区块链解决方案作为少数群体群体相关的复杂性，并将此类群体分类为股份证明（POS）区块链。根据亨斯克（Hunsaker）的说法，大多数链条中的赌注高度集中在一小群内部人群中。因此，仅仅为少数群体分叉可能还不够，只是他们擅长“社会羞辱”。

This continues a discussion between Yakovenko and Hunsaker, both prominent blockchain experts, who have been exchanging views on the PoS blockchain governance system. Yakovenko stated that most forks don’t work because the majority is doing the right thing for the users, not because the minority is powerless to do the right thing.

这继续讨论Yakovenko和Hunsaker，这都是著名的区块链专家，他们一直在交换对POS区块链治理体系的看法。 Yakovenko表示，大多数叉子不起作用，因为大多数人对用户做正确的事情，而不是因为少数人无能为力做正确的事情。

Moreover, Yakovenko put a lot of weight on the role of users in blockchain networks. According to Yakovenko, it’s the users who ultimately hold all the demands, not necessarily just those with the biggest stakes. He also believes in user coordination since user demand is power-law distributed, meaning a vocal and coordinated user base can influence the chain more than a small group with a large stake. In response, Hunsaker noted how external factors can influence users’ decisions. For instance, he thinks users will stick with forks that Circle and Tether will honor.

此外，Yakovenko对用户在区块链网络中的作用施加了很大的重视。根据Yakovenko的说法，最终持有所有要求的用户，不一定只是那些拥有最大股份的用户。他还相信用户协调，因为用户需求是分配了幂律，这意味着声音和协调的用户群可以影响链，而不是一个较大的股份的小组。作为回应，Hunsaker指出了外部因素如何影响用户的决定。例如，他认为用户将坚持圆形和系绳将尊重的叉子。

It’s worth noting that this discussion, brought on after the SUI team’s decisive actions following the CETUS DEX multi-million dollar exploit and the actions of the majority of the community, is highlighting one of blockchain’s most fundamental, yet often fuzzily defined, elements: decentralization.

值得注意的是，在SUI团队在CETUS DEX数百万美元的剥削之后的决定性行动以及大多数社区的行动之后，进行了这项讨论，这突显了区块链最基本最基本，最基本但经常定义的元素之一，“元素：德境”。

Discussions about what true blockchain decentralization means, and what tradeoffs are acceptable, might seem academic until a real-world crisis hits, like the recent CETUS DEX hack. This is where teams are forced to make nearly impossible choices, juggling short-term user protection against governance ethics in a lawless, yet interconnected, online world.

关于真正的区块链权力下放的含义以及哪些可以接受的权衡的讨论在现实世界中的危机爆发之前似乎是学术性的，例如最近的Cetus Dex Hack。在这里，团队被迫做出几乎不可能的选择，在无法法律但相互联系的在线世界中兼顾短期用户保护对治理伦理的影响。

Such debates could continue or resurface under similar circumstances until the blockchain community reaches a consensus or strikes an acceptable balance between governance and security.

在类似情况下，这种辩论可以继续或重新出现，直到区块链社区达成共识或达到治理和安全之间的可接受平衡为止。