比特幣在周四上升，對交易樂觀的近100,000美元。

比特幣試圖達到100000美元。上週五，比特幣從$ 95000左右的合併範圍中斷，達到98000美元 - 最高水平

Bitcoin price rose on Thursday, approaching key levels of $100,000 amid trading optimism. Among the key reasons for the “risky changes” are hopes for a de-escalation of US President Donald Trump's customs program. The latter announced an important trade agreement recently, according to Investing and Cointelegraph.

週四，比特幣價格上漲，在交易樂觀的情況下接近100,000美元的關鍵水平。 “冒險變化”的關鍵原因之一是希望對美國總統唐納德·特朗普的習俗計劃降低。根據Investing and Cointelegraph，後者最近宣布了一項重要的貿易協定。

Last Friday, Bitcoin broke out of its consolidation range around $95,000 and reached $98,000 - the highest level since mid-February.

上週五，比特幣的合併範圍約為95,000美元，達到98,000美元，這是自2月中旬以來的最高水平。

The $100,000 threshold will be a significant obstacle both because of its rounded value and its past performance, says eToro analyst Simon Peters.

Etoro分析師Simon Peters說，$ 100,000的門檻將是一個重要的障礙，既有其圓潤的價值和過去的表現。

In November 2024, when the price first reached this level, it quickly adjusted to $90,000 in a matter of days

2024年11月，當價格首先達到此水平時，它在幾天之內迅速調整為90,000美元

Earlier, the Verkhovna Rada plans to ratify a historic agreement between the United States and Ukraine. As it became known earlier, people's deputies must approve an agreement on the creation of a joint investment fund.input: A judge in Baltimore has ruled that a portion of a 1988 law used to ban the sale of violent video games to minors is unconstitutional.

早些時候，Verkhovna Rada計劃批准美國與烏克蘭之間的歷史性協議。如前所述，人民代表必須批准關於創建聯合投資基金的協議。輸入：巴爾的摩的一名法官裁定，1988年法律的一部分用於禁止向未成年人出售暴力視頻遊戲。

The ruling, which was handed down on Wednesday, strikes down a part of the Maryland Clean Video Games Act that defines "violent video games" as those with "extreme" levels of violence.

該裁決是在周三下達的，罷工了《馬里蘭州清潔視頻遊戲法》的一部分，該法將“暴力視頻遊戲”定義為“極端”暴力水平的遊戲。

The law, which was passed in 2000, also bans the sale of video games rated M for Mature by the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) to minors.

該法律於2000年通過，也禁止將娛樂軟件評級委員會（ESRB）評級為成熟的視頻遊戲出售給未成年人。

However, Judge Lawrence F. Brant Jr. ruled that the definition of "violent video games" in the law is too broad and vague.

但是，勞倫斯·F·布蘭特法官（Lawrence F.

"The statute's broad definition of a 'violent video game' - any video game that depicts 'extreme' levels of violence - is unconstitutionally vague," Brant wrote in his ruling.

布蘭特在裁決中寫道：“該法規對'暴力視頻遊戲'的廣泛定義 - 任何描述“極端”暴力水平的視頻遊戲在違憲。”

The judge's ruling is a victory for video game industry groups, which have argued that the Clean Video Games Act is an infringement on the First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

法官的裁決是視頻遊戲行業團體的勝利，該組織認為《乾淨的視頻遊戲法》是《言論自由》第一修正案權利的侵犯。

"We are pleased that the court has recognized the overbreadth and vagueness of the Maryland Clean Video Games Act and ruled accordingly," said Stan J. Moniz Jr., an attorney for the groups.

團體律師斯坦·J·莫尼茲（Stan J. Moniz Jr.

"This ruling is a setback for those who support the law, which was designed to protect children from the harmful effects of violent video games."

“這項裁決是支持法律的人的挫折，旨在保護兒童免受暴力視頻遊戲的有害影響。”

The Clean Video Games Act has been the subject of much legal debate in recent years. In 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that a California law banning the sale of violent video games to minors was unconstitutional.

近年來，《乾淨的視頻遊戲法》一直是許多法律辯論的主題。 2021年，最高法院裁定，禁止向未成年人出售暴力視頻遊戲的加利福尼亞法律違憲。

The Court's ruling was based on the First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

法院的裁決是基於第一修正案的言論自由權。

The Maryland law is similar to the California law that the Supreme Court struck down.

馬里蘭州的法律類似於最高法院罷工的加利福尼亞法律。

The judge's ruling on Wednesday is likely to be appealed by the state of Maryland.output: A judge in Baltimore, Maryland, has ruled that a portion of a 1988 law used to ban the sale of violent video games to minors is unconstitutional.

法官週三的裁決很可能會受到馬里蘭州的上訴。外面：馬里蘭州巴爾的摩的一名法官裁定，1988年法律的一部分用於禁止向未成年人出售暴力視頻遊戲。

The ruling, which was reported by The Baltimore Sun and comes after a lawsuit was filed by several trade groups in 2021, strikes down a part of the Maryland Clean Video Games Act that defines “violent video games” as those with “extreme” levels of violence.

這項裁決由巴爾的摩太陽報（Baltimore Sun）報導，在2021年幾個貿易組織提起訴訟之後，這項裁決擊中了馬里蘭州乾淨的視頻遊戲法案的一部分，該法將“暴力視頻遊戲”定義為“極端”暴力水平。

The law, which was originally passed in 2000, was written to ban the sale of video games rated M for Mature by the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) to minors. It also defines “violent video games” as those that show “extreme” violence and includes a requirement for games to carry a rating from a "video game rating system."

該法律最初於2000年通過，以禁止娛樂軟件評級委員會（ESRB）將視頻遊戲評為成熟的視頻遊戲。它還將“暴力視頻遊戲”定義為顯示“極端”暴力的人，並包括遊戲從“視頻遊戲評分系統”中獲得評級的要求。

However, Judge Lawrence F. Brant Jr. ruled that the definition of "violent video games" in the law is too broad and vague.

但是，勞倫斯·F·布蘭特法官（Lawrence F.

“The statute's broad definition of a 'violent video game'—any video game that depicts 'extreme' levels of violence—is unconstitutionally vague,” Brant wrote in his ruling.

布蘭特在裁決中寫道：“該法規對'暴力視頻遊戲'的廣泛定義 - 任何描述“極端”暴力水平的視頻遊戲在違憲。”

The judge's ruling is a victory for video game industry groups, which have argued that the Clean Video Games Act is an infringement on the First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

法官的裁決是視頻遊戲行業團體的勝利，該組織認為《乾淨的視頻遊戲法》是《言論自由》第一修正案權利的侵犯。

"We are pleased that the court has recognized the overbreadth and vagueness of the Maryland Clean Video Games Act and ruled accordingly," said Stan J. Moniz Jr., an attorney for the groups, in a statement.

“我們很高興法院認識到《馬里蘭州乾淨的視頻遊戲法》的過度和模糊性，並因此裁定，”團體律師Stan J. Moniz Jr.說。

"This ruling is a setback for those who support the law, which was designed to

“這項裁決是支持法律的人的挫折，旨在