比特币在周四上升，对交易乐观的近100,000美元。

比特币试图达到100000美元。上周五，比特币从$ 95000左右的合并范围中脱颖而出，达到98000美元 - 最高水平

Bitcoin price rose on Thursday, approaching key levels of $100,000 amid trading optimism. Among the key reasons for the “risky changes” are hopes for a de-escalation of US President Donald Trump's customs program. The latter announced an important trade agreement recently, according to Investing and Cointelegraph.

周四，比特币价格上涨，在交易乐观的情况下接近100,000美元的关键水平。 “冒险变化”的关键原因之一是希望对美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的习俗计划降低。根据Investing and Cointelegraph，后者最近宣布了一项重要的贸易协定。

Last Friday, Bitcoin broke out of its consolidation range around $95,000 and reached $98,000 - the highest level since mid-February.

上周五，比特币的合并范围约为95,000美元，达到98,000美元，这是自2月中旬以来的最高水平。

The $100,000 threshold will be a significant obstacle both because of its rounded value and its past performance, says eToro analyst Simon Peters.

Etoro分析师Simon Peters说，$ 100,000的门槛将是一个重要的障碍，既有其圆润的价值和过去的表现。

In November 2024, when the price first reached this level, it quickly adjusted to $90,000 in a matter of days

2024年11月，当价格首先达到此水平时，它在几天之内迅速调整为90,000美元

Earlier, the Verkhovna Rada plans to ratify a historic agreement between the United States and Ukraine. As it became known earlier, people's deputies must approve an agreement on the creation of a joint investment fund.input: A judge in Baltimore has ruled that a portion of a 1988 law used to ban the sale of violent video games to minors is unconstitutional.

早些时候，Verkhovna Rada计划批准美国与乌克兰之间的历史性协议。如前所述，人民代表必须批准关于创建联合投资基金的协议。输入：巴尔的摩的一名法官裁定，1988年法律的一部分用于禁止向未成年人出售暴力视频游戏。

The ruling, which was handed down on Wednesday, strikes down a part of the Maryland Clean Video Games Act that defines "violent video games" as those with "extreme" levels of violence.

该裁决是在周三下达的，罢工了《马里兰州清洁视频游戏法》的一部分，该法将“暴力视频游戏”定义为“极端”暴力水平的游戏。

The law, which was passed in 2000, also bans the sale of video games rated M for Mature by the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) to minors.

该法律于2000年通过，也禁止将娱乐软件评级委员会（ESRB）评级为成熟的视频游戏出售给未成年人。

However, Judge Lawrence F. Brant Jr. ruled that the definition of "violent video games" in the law is too broad and vague.

但是，劳伦斯·F·布兰特法官（Lawrence F.

"The statute's broad definition of a 'violent video game' - any video game that depicts 'extreme' levels of violence - is unconstitutionally vague," Brant wrote in his ruling.

布兰特在裁决中写道：“该法规对'暴力视频游戏'的广泛定义 - 任何描述“极端”暴力水平的视频游戏在违宪。”

The judge's ruling is a victory for video game industry groups, which have argued that the Clean Video Games Act is an infringement on the First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

法官的裁决是视频游戏行业团体的胜利，该组织认为《干净的视频游戏法》是《言论自由》第一修正案权利的侵犯。

"We are pleased that the court has recognized the overbreadth and vagueness of the Maryland Clean Video Games Act and ruled accordingly," said Stan J. Moniz Jr., an attorney for the groups.

团体律师斯坦·J·莫尼兹（Stan J. Moniz Jr.

"This ruling is a setback for those who support the law, which was designed to protect children from the harmful effects of violent video games."

“这项裁决是支持法律的人的挫折，旨在保护儿童免受暴力视频游戏的有害影响。”

The Clean Video Games Act has been the subject of much legal debate in recent years. In 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that a California law banning the sale of violent video games to minors was unconstitutional.

近年来，《干净的视频游戏法》一直是许多法律辩论的主题。 2021年，最高法院裁定，禁止向未成年人出售暴力视频游戏的加利福尼亚法律违宪。

The Court's ruling was based on the First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

法院的裁决是基于第一修正案的言论自由权。

The Maryland law is similar to the California law that the Supreme Court struck down.

马里兰州的法律类似于最高法院罢工的加利福尼亚法律。

The judge's ruling on Wednesday is likely to be appealed by the state of Maryland.output: A judge in Baltimore, Maryland, has ruled that a portion of a 1988 law used to ban the sale of violent video games to minors is unconstitutional.

法官周三的裁决很可能会受到马里兰州的上诉。外面：马里兰州巴尔的摩的一名法官裁定，1988年法律的一部分用于禁止向未成年人出售暴力视频游戏。

The ruling, which was reported by The Baltimore Sun and comes after a lawsuit was filed by several trade groups in 2021, strikes down a part of the Maryland Clean Video Games Act that defines “violent video games” as those with “extreme” levels of violence.

这项裁决由巴尔的摩太阳报（Baltimore Sun）报道，在2021年几个贸易组织提起诉讼之后，这项裁决击中了马里兰州干净的视频游戏法案的一部分，该法将“暴力视频游戏”定义为“极端”暴力水平。

The law, which was originally passed in 2000, was written to ban the sale of video games rated M for Mature by the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) to minors. It also defines “violent video games” as those that show “extreme” violence and includes a requirement for games to carry a rating from a "video game rating system."

该法律最初于2000年通过，以禁止娱乐软件评级委员会（ESRB）将视频游戏评为成熟的视频游戏。它还将“暴力视频游戏”定义为显示“极端”暴力的人，并包括游戏从“视频游戏评分系统”中获得评级的要求。

However, Judge Lawrence F. Brant Jr. ruled that the definition of "violent video games" in the law is too broad and vague.

但是，劳伦斯·F·布兰特法官（Lawrence F.

“The statute's broad definition of a 'violent video game'—any video game that depicts 'extreme' levels of violence—is unconstitutionally vague,” Brant wrote in his ruling.

布兰特在裁决中写道：“该法规对'暴力视频游戏'的广泛定义 - 任何描述“极端”暴力水平的视频游戏在违宪。”

The judge's ruling is a victory for video game industry groups, which have argued that the Clean Video Games Act is an infringement on the First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

法官的裁决是视频游戏行业团体的胜利，该组织认为《干净的视频游戏法》是《言论自由》第一修正案权利的侵犯。

"We are pleased that the court has recognized the overbreadth and vagueness of the Maryland Clean Video Games Act and ruled accordingly," said Stan J. Moniz Jr., an attorney for the groups, in a statement.

“我们很高兴法院认识到《马里兰州干净的视频游戏法》的过度和模糊性，并因此裁定，”团体律师Stan J. Moniz Jr.说。

"This ruling is a setback for those who support the law, which was designed to

“这项裁决是支持法律的人的挫折，旨在