比特幣應該只是賺錢嗎？開發人員說是

在比特幣世界上，一場衝突正在醞釀中，涉及如何使用區塊鏈 - 有些人爭論，濫用。

A clash is brewing in the Bitcoin (BTC) world over how the blockchain is being used - and some argue, misused.

在比特幣（BTC）世界上，一場衝突正在醞釀中，涉及如何使用區塊鏈 - 有些人爭論，濫用。

In a recent discussion on X, Saifedean Ammous, author of The Bitcoin Standard, said he’s willing to fund efforts to make spamming the network more costly. His comment follows concerns from other members of the community that non-financial data is clogging up block space and deviating from Bitcoin’s original monetary purpose.

比特幣標準的作者Saifedean Ammous最近的討論中說，他願意為使網絡更加昂貴而提供資金。他的評論遵循社區其他成員的擔憂，即非財務數據正在堵塞街區空間，並偏離比特幣的原始貨幣目的。

The technical friction centers around a proposed code change that would let node operators block certain data types more easily. The developer pushing for the update, known on X as GrassFedBitcoin, argues that the lack of filtering options contributes to unnecessary network bloat.

技術摩擦圍繞提出的代碼更改，該代碼將使節點運算符更容易阻止某些數據類型。開發人員推動更新（在X上稱為Grassfedbitcoin）的開發人員認為，缺乏過濾選項會導致不必要的網絡膨脹。

“We have no way to stop it except by making new software that adds new functionality to filter out the spam,” he explained. “People who want the nodes to be able to filter out certain data types will upgrade their nodes. People who prefer to keep full nodes will be able to do so.”

他解釋說：“除了製造新軟件以添加新功能以過濾垃圾郵件外，我們無法阻止它。” “希望節點能夠濾除某些數據類型的人會升級其節點。喜歡保留完整節點的人將能夠這樣做。”

Those against the idea say it’s an endless game of cat-and-mouse. Spam can easily be disguised using clever coding tricks, meaning any filtering tools would need constant updates.

那些反對這個想法的人說，這是一款無盡的貓鼠遊戲。可以使用巧妙的編碼技巧輕鬆掩飾垃圾郵件，這意味著任何過濾工具都需要恆定的更新。

“It’s not like you can add a spam token and then all spam transactions will be in that token,” adds Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream. “People will just put the spam payload in the output script or in the witness program.”

BlockStream首席執行官Adam Back補充說：“這並不是說您可以添加垃圾郵件令牌，然後所有垃圾郵件交易都在該令牌中。” “人們只會將垃圾郵件有效載荷放入輸出腳本或證人計劃中。”

However, Ammous sees it more like email spam - messy but manageable. He says refusing to relay junk data isn’t censorship but rather a valid choice for node operators, who already reject invalid transactions or those with insufficient fees.

但是，大松東西更像是電子郵件垃圾郵件 - 凌亂但易於管理。他說，拒絕中繼垃圾數據不是審查制度，而是對節點運營商的有效選擇，他們已經拒絕無效的交易或費用不足的交易。

“We can start by making it harder to spam and more interesting to cooperate in keeping the network spam free,” said Ammous. “Maybe we should hire some developers to make tools to disrupt the spammers’ tools.”

“我們可以首先使垃圾郵件變得更加困難，更有趣的是，與網絡垃圾郵件保持自由，” Ammous說。 “也許我們應該僱用一些開發人員製造工具來破壞垃圾郵件發送者的工具。”

The technical crux of the issue lies in how easily nodes can be programmed to identify and segregate specific data. At present, it's a relatively tedious process, rendering it largely unfeasible for large-scale spam filtering.

該問題的技術癥結在於如何輕鬆地編程節點以識別和隔離特定數據。目前，這是一個相對繁瑣的過程，使其在大規模垃圾郵件過濾方面在很大程度上不可行。

This discussion comes amid a broader consideration of what belongs on Bitcoin’s base layer as block sizes continue to grow. They are already averaging 1.5MB and are expected to balloon to 4MB due to these inscriptions.

隨著塊大小的不斷增長，對比特幣基層層屬於比特幣基層的東西的更廣泛考慮。由於這些銘文，它們已經平均為1.5MB，並且預計將使4MB膨脹至4MB。