Balarchrex要求對Solana Foundation的持有

穆塔茲（Mumtaz）反對市場行為建議：“那他們為什麼要購買並擴展到它？好奇。”

The lively discussion on X, formerly Twitter, began with Balarchrex demanding more transparency from the Solana Foundation, specifically an on-chain accounting of the institution's holdings.

關於X（以前是Twitter）的生動討論始於Balarchrex，要求Solana Foundation提高透明度，特別是對機構持有的鏈上的會計。

The user claimed that no institution will take SOL seriously as an investment when they have no idea how much SOL the foundation holds and how much it is dumping on them.

用戶聲稱，當他們不知道基金會擁有多少SOL以及它向其投入多少SOL時，沒有機構將認真對待SOL作為投資。

However, Mumtaz countered that if institutions are not investing in SOL, then why are they expanding to it and buying it?

但是，Mumtaz反駁說，如果機構不投資SOL，那麼他們為什麼要擴展併購買呢？

He added that it is not difficult to figure out a range of how much the foundation holds.

他補充說，很難找出基礎所持程度的範圍。

The discussion then shifted to client diversity, which Mumtaz highlighted by listing three clients already running on mainnet—agave, jito-aggame, and frankendancer—and noting that Firedancer is already being tested extensively and will be live Q3/Q4.

然後，討論轉向了客戶多樣性，Mumtaz通過列出了已經在Mainnet上運行的三個客戶（Agave，Jito-Aggame和Frankendancer）突出顯示，並指​​出Firedancer已經進行了廣泛的測試，並將進行現場Q3/Q4。

In Mumtaz's view, the presence of multiple independent teams working on the same core code and fixing it contributes to code quality.

在穆塔茲（Mumtaz）看來，在相同的核心代碼上工作的多個獨立團隊的存在並將其修復有助於代碼質量。

But Balarchrex argued that these clients are just forks of the original Solana code, and he pressed for statistics on validator adoption.

但是Balarchrex認為這些客戶只是原始Solana代碼的分叉，他敦促有關驗證者採用的統計信息。

In response, Mumtaz directed critics to Solanabeach or validators.app, and the data is not hidden.

作為回應，Mumtaz將批評家定向了solanabeach或驗證器。 App，數據並沒有隱藏。

The beta label, however, refused to fade from the discussion.

但是，Beta標籤拒絕從討論中消失。

Balarchrex had previously highlighted that even recent status-update screenshots still include "beta" in the mainnet build name. He asked why the term still surfaces every time Solana goes down.

Balarchrex此前曾強調，即使是最近的狀態升級屏幕截圖，Mainnet構建名稱中仍然包含“ Beta”。他問為什麼每當索拉納倒下時，這個詞仍然浮出水面。

To this, Mumtaz stated that the chain has gone down once in over 2 years, and that was due to a devops issue, and he has already said that the name should be removed several times.

為此，Mumtaz表示，該連鎖店已有兩年多了一次，這是由於Devops問題，他已經說該名稱應被刪除多次。

He added that he personally handles all the network updates and that he announces them in the same place where they are reporting the chain going down.

他補充說，他親自處理所有網絡更新，並在報告鏈條下降的同一地點宣布它們。

As tempers frayed, the debate devolved into personal barbs.

隨著脾氣暴躁，辯論變成了個人倒鉤。

Balarchrex summarized his position: "Solana is still in beta, the network went down twice in 3 months, the validator clients are the same original code with minor changes, and they have still not addressed my points."

Balarchrex總結了他的立場：“ Solana仍在Beta中，該網絡在3個月內兩次下降，驗證器客戶端是相同的原始代碼，並且尚未解決我的觀點。”

Mumtaz, in turn, dismissed the critique as "grasping at straws,"suggesting that anyone worried about the token supply should sell their SOL if they're concerned, he will happily buy it.

反過來，穆姆塔茲（Mumtaz）駁回了批評為“抓住稻草”，這表明任何擔心令牌供應的人都應該出售他們的舊服務，如果他們有所了解，他會很樂意購買它。