Balarchrex要求对Solana Foundation的持有

穆塔兹（Mumtaz）反对市场行为建议：“那他们为什么要购买并扩展到它？好奇。”

The lively discussion on X, formerly Twitter, began with Balarchrex demanding more transparency from the Solana Foundation, specifically an on-chain accounting of the institution's holdings.

关于X（以前是Twitter）的生动讨论始于Balarchrex，要求Solana Foundation提高透明度，特别是对机构持有的链上的会计。

The user claimed that no institution will take SOL seriously as an investment when they have no idea how much SOL the foundation holds and how much it is dumping on them.

用户声称，当他们不知道基金会拥有多少SOL以及它向其投入多少SOL时，没有机构将认真对待SOL作为投资。

However, Mumtaz countered that if institutions are not investing in SOL, then why are they expanding to it and buying it?

但是，Mumtaz反驳说，如果机构不投资SOL，那么他们为什么要扩展并购买呢？

He added that it is not difficult to figure out a range of how much the foundation holds.

他补充说，很难找出基础所持程度的范围。

The discussion then shifted to client diversity, which Mumtaz highlighted by listing three clients already running on mainnet—agave, jito-aggame, and frankendancer—and noting that Firedancer is already being tested extensively and will be live Q3/Q4.

然后，讨论转向了客户多样性，Mumtaz通过列出了已经在Mainnet上运行的三个客户（Agave，Jito-Aggame和Frankendancer）突出显示，并指​​出Firedancer已经进行了广泛的测试，并将进行现场Q3/Q4。

In Mumtaz's view, the presence of multiple independent teams working on the same core code and fixing it contributes to code quality.

在穆塔兹（Mumtaz）看来，在相同的核心代码上工作的多个独立团队的存在并将其修复有助于代码质量。

But Balarchrex argued that these clients are just forks of the original Solana code, and he pressed for statistics on validator adoption.

但是Balarchrex认为这些客户只是原始Solana代码的分叉，他敦促有关验证者采用的统计信息。

In response, Mumtaz directed critics to Solanabeach or validators.app, and the data is not hidden.

作为回应，Mumtaz将批评家定向了solanabeach或验证器。App，数据并没有隐藏。

The beta label, however, refused to fade from the discussion.

但是，Beta标签拒绝从讨论中消失。

Balarchrex had previously highlighted that even recent status-update screenshots still include "beta" in the mainnet build name. He asked why the term still surfaces every time Solana goes down.

Balarchrex此前曾强调，即使是最近的状态升级屏幕截图，Mainnet构建名称中仍然包含“ Beta”。他问为什么每当索拉纳倒下时，这个词仍然浮出水面。

To this, Mumtaz stated that the chain has gone down once in over 2 years, and that was due to a devops issue, and he has already said that the name should be removed several times.

为此，Mumtaz表示，该连锁店已有两年多了一次，这是由于Devops问题，他已经说该名称应被删除多次。

He added that he personally handles all the network updates and that he announces them in the same place where they are reporting the chain going down.

他补充说，他亲自处理所有网络更新，并在报告链条下降的同一地点宣布它们。

As tempers frayed, the debate devolved into personal barbs.

随着脾气暴躁，辩论变成了个人倒钩。

Balarchrex summarized his position: "Solana is still in beta, the network went down twice in 3 months, the validator clients are the same original code with minor changes, and they have still not addressed my points."

Balarchrex总结了他的立场：“ Solana仍在Beta中，该网络在3个月内两次下降，验证器客户端是相同的原始代码，并且尚未解决我的观点。”

Mumtaz, in turn, dismissed the critique as "grasping at straws,"suggesting that anyone worried about the token supply should sell their SOL if they're concerned, he will happily buy it.

反过来，穆姆塔兹（Mumtaz）驳回了批评为“抓住稻草”，这表明任何担心令牌供应的人都应该出售他们的旧服务，如果他们有所了解，他会很乐意购买它。