（本文是在AI工具Castmagic的幫助下撰寫的，並由我們的編輯團隊進行了審查，以確保准確性。如果您發現任何錯誤，請與我們聯繫。）

考慮到這種情況：這是AFC冠軍賽，這是堪薩斯城酋長和布法羅比爾之間的高風險比賽。當第四季度以平局結束時，他們進入了加時賽。

The NFL is reportedly considering yet another change to its overtime format, and this time it appears they may be able to get something over the line.

據報導，NFL正在考慮其加班格式的另一個更改，這一次看來他們可能能夠通過線路獲得一些東西。

The league is discussing a proposal that would guarantee both teams touch the ball in overtime.

聯盟正在討論一項建議，該提議可以確保兩支球隊在加時賽中觸球。

As part of the Inside Coverage Podcast, Jason Fitz came up with a novel overtime proposal.

作為內部報導播客的一部分，傑森·菲茨（Jason Fitz）提出了一項新穎的加時賽建議。

Consider this scenario: It’s the AFC championship game, a winner-takes-all game with major implications. The Kansas City Chiefs and Buffalo Bills are locked in a close battle that spills over into overtime.

考慮到這種情況：這是AFC冠軍賽，這是一款具有重大影響的全能遊戲。堪薩斯城酋長和布法羅·比爾（Buffalo Bills）陷入了一場近距離戰鬥中，該戰鬥蔓延到加時賽中。

The coin toss is a moment of tension, and the Chiefs emerge victorious. Commencing with the ball, Patrick Mahomes leads the offense on a 12-play drive, methodically chewing up 7:06 of the clock before finding Travis Kelce for a touchdown pass.

硬幣折騰是一個緊張的時刻，酋長隊取得了勝利。從球開始，帕特里克·馬霍姆斯（Patrick Mahomes）在12場比賽中領先進攻，有條不紊地咀嚼了7:06的時鐘，然後才找到特拉維斯·凱爾斯（Travis Kelce）進行達陣傳球。

Here's Fitz's proposal: Because the Chiefs offense took 7:06 to score, the Bills offense would then get that same amount of time to counter and match the score.

這是菲茨（Fitz）的提議：由於酋長進攻花了7:06得分，因此賬單進攻將有相同的時間來對抗和匹配得分。

“They got to go down and match that score in that amount of time. Look at this, I think we just solved overtime,” Fitz said.

菲茨說：“他們必須在這段時間內跌倒並匹配得分。看一下，我認為我們只是解決了加時賽。”

“It’s an interesting approach to it. But what if you scored eight seconds?” Charles Robinson interjected. “The team's getting the ball back and they're going, ‘Great, so now we have an opportunity to match this in eight seconds.’

“這是一種有趣的方法。但是，如果您得分八秒鐘，該怎麼辦？”查爾斯·羅賓遜（Charles Robinson）插話。 “球隊將球恢復了原狀，'太好了，所以現在我們有機會在八秒鐘內進行匹配。'

“Then you just got to look at your defense and be like, ‘Really, you did this to us?’”

“然後你只是看著自己的防守，然後說，'真的，你對我們做了嗎？'”

Robinson then explained why he doesn't think owners will adopt a proposal like Fitz's.

羅賓遜隨後解釋了為什麼他認為業主不會採用像菲茨這樣的提案。

“This is why I think these proposals often don't even get to the voting phases, because this breaks out in these rooms and there starts to be these debates and arguments, and then somebody raises their hand and goes, 'Is this really broken?'” Robinson said. “Does the data show? Or are some people just upset about a certain scenario that played out, you know, with their particular team.

羅賓遜說：“這就是為什麼我認為這些建議通常甚至沒有進入投票階段，因為這在這些房間裡爆發了，並且開始有這些辯論和論點，然後有人舉起手，'這真的打破了嗎？” “數據顯示嗎？或者有些人只是對與他們的特定團隊一起表現出的某種情況感到沮喪。

"I don't think it's gonna work, Fitz. I don't think we solved it today on Inside Coverage. We didn't fix overtime. Sorry."

“我認為它不會有效，菲茨。我認為我們今天在內部覆蓋範圍上解決了它。我們沒有加班。對不起。”

What say you? Do you like Fitz's overtime proposal (obviously with the need to flesh it out a bit more)?

你怎麼說？您是否喜歡Fitz的加時賽提案（顯然需要更多地將其充實）？

To hear more NFL discussions, tune into "Inside Coverage" on Apple, Spotify or YouTube.

要聆聽更多NFL討論，請在Apple，Spotify或YouTube上調整“內部覆蓋”。