（本文是在AI工具Castmagic的帮助下撰写的，并由我们的编辑团队进行了审查，以确保准确性。如果您发现任何错误，请与我们联系。）

考虑到这种情况：这是AFC冠军赛，这是堪萨斯城酋长和布法罗比尔之间的高风险比赛。当第四季度以平局结束时，他们进入了加时赛。

The NFL is reportedly considering yet another change to its overtime format, and this time it appears they may be able to get something over the line.

据报道，NFL正在考虑其加班格式的另一个更改，这一次看来他们可能能够通过线路获得一些东西。

The league is discussing a proposal that would guarantee both teams touch the ball in overtime.

联盟正在讨论一项建议，该提议可以确保两支球队在加时赛中触球。

As part of the Inside Coverage Podcast, Jason Fitz came up with a novel overtime proposal.

作为内部报道播客的一部分，杰森·菲茨（Jason Fitz）提出了一项新颖的加时赛建议。

Consider this scenario: It’s the AFC championship game, a winner-takes-all game with major implications. The Kansas City Chiefs and Buffalo Bills are locked in a close battle that spills over into overtime.

考虑到这种情况：这是AFC冠军赛，这是一款具有重大影响的全能游戏。堪萨斯城酋长和布法罗·比尔（Buffalo Bills）陷入了一场近距离战斗中，该战斗蔓延到加时赛中。

The coin toss is a moment of tension, and the Chiefs emerge victorious. Commencing with the ball, Patrick Mahomes leads the offense on a 12-play drive, methodically chewing up 7:06 of the clock before finding Travis Kelce for a touchdown pass.

硬币折腾是一个紧张的时刻，酋长队取得了胜利。从球开始，帕特里克·马霍姆斯（Patrick Mahomes）在12场比赛中领先进攻，有条不紊地咀嚼了7:06的时钟，然后才找到特拉维斯·凯尔斯（Travis Kelce）进行达阵传球。

Here's Fitz's proposal: Because the Chiefs offense took 7:06 to score, the Bills offense would then get that same amount of time to counter and match the score.

这是菲茨（Fitz）的提议：由于酋长进攻花了7:06得分，因此账单进攻将有相同的时间来对抗和匹配得分。

“They got to go down and match that score in that amount of time. Look at this, I think we just solved overtime,” Fitz said.

菲茨说：“他们必须在这段时间内跌倒并匹配得分。看一下，我认为我们只是解决了加时赛。”

“It’s an interesting approach to it. But what if you scored eight seconds?” Charles Robinson interjected. “The team's getting the ball back and they're going, ‘Great, so now we have an opportunity to match this in eight seconds.’

“这是一种有趣的方法。但是，如果您得分八秒钟，该怎么办？”查尔斯·罗宾逊（Charles Robinson）插话。 “球队将球恢复了原状，'太好了，所以现在我们有机会在八秒钟内进行匹配。'

“Then you just got to look at your defense and be like, ‘Really, you did this to us?’”

“然后你只是看着自己的防守，然后说，'真的，你对我们做了吗？'”

Robinson then explained why he doesn't think owners will adopt a proposal like Fitz's.

罗宾逊随后解释了为什么他认为业主不会采用像菲茨这样的提案。

“This is why I think these proposals often don't even get to the voting phases, because this breaks out in these rooms and there starts to be these debates and arguments, and then somebody raises their hand and goes, 'Is this really broken?'” Robinson said. “Does the data show? Or are some people just upset about a certain scenario that played out, you know, with their particular team.

罗宾逊说：“这就是为什么我认为这些建议通常甚至没有进入投票阶段，因为这在这些房间里爆发了，并且开始有这些辩论和论点，然后有人举起手，'这真的打破了吗？” “数据显示吗？或者有些人只是对与他们的特定团队一起表现出的某种情况感到沮丧。

"I don't think it's gonna work, Fitz. I don't think we solved it today on Inside Coverage. We didn't fix overtime. Sorry."

“我认为它不会有效，菲茨。我认为我们今天在内部覆盖范围上解决了它。我们没有加班。对不起。”

What say you? Do you like Fitz's overtime proposal (obviously with the need to flesh it out a bit more)?

你怎么说？您是否喜欢Fitz的加时赛提案（显然需要更多地将其充实）？

To hear more NFL discussions, tune into "Inside Coverage" on Apple, Spotify or YouTube.

要聆听更多NFL讨论，请在Apple，Spotify或YouTube上调整“内部覆盖”。