Why You Shouldn't Store Your Crypto on an Exchange (The Importance of Self-Custody)

Exchange Hacks and Security Breaches

1. Centralized exchanges have been repeatedly compromised, resulting in losses exceeding billions of dollars across multiple incidents.

2. Hackers target hot wallets maintained by exchanges because they hold large volumes of digital assets accessible via internet-connected infrastructure.

3. Even platforms with robust insurance funds often delay or deny full reimbursement to affected users during insolvency proceedings.

4. Historical cases like Mt. Gox, Coincheck, and FTX demonstrate how custodial failures can erase user balances without warning or recourse.

5. Once private keys are held by a third party, users relinquish cryptographic control—making them dependent on the exchange’s operational integrity and security posture.

Regulatory Seizures and Freezes

1. Authorities have seized exchange-held assets during investigations, freezing customer funds for months or years without transparency.

2. In jurisdictions where crypto regulation remains ambiguous, courts may treat exchange balances as liabilities rather than user-owned property.

3. Legal precedents such as the Bitfinex/Tether case show how regulatory pressure can lead to unilateral withdrawal restrictions affecting all users.

4. When exchanges face compliance demands, they may suspend withdrawals without prior notice, effectively locking users out of their own capital.

5. Regulatory actions rarely distinguish between innocent users and bad actors—everyone’s funds become subject to blanket freezes or forfeiture protocols.

Counterparty Risk and Platform Solvency

1. Exchanges operate as financial intermediaries, not banks—meaning deposits lack FDIC or equivalent protections.

2. Many platforms engage in proprietary trading, lending, or staking using user assets without explicit consent or clear segregation.

3. Off-chain accounting practices obscure whether user balances reflect actual on-chain holdings or mere IOUs backed by illiquid reserves.

4. Bankruptcy filings reveal that user claims are often treated as unsecured debt, placing them behind creditors in liquidation hierarchies.

5. The collapse of Celsius and Voyager illustrated how reliance on exchange solvency exposes users to cascading insolvency risks across interconnected lending ecosystems.

Lack of Transactional Autonomy

1. Users cannot initiate on-chain transactions directly from exchange accounts—every transfer requires platform approval and processing time.

2. Exchange-imposed KYC requirements restrict access to certain tokens, networks, or features based on jurisdictional policies rather than technical capability.

3. Withdrawal limits, mandatory waiting periods, and dynamic fee structures reduce flexibility during volatile market conditions.

4. Some exchanges disable withdrawals entirely during network congestion or internal maintenance, stranding funds at critical moments.

5. Smart contract interactions—such as participating in DeFi protocols or signing governance proposals—are impossible when private keys remain inaccessible.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can I recover my coins if an exchange gets hacked?Recovery depends entirely on the exchange’s incident response, reserve adequacy, and legal standing—not on blockchain mechanics. Most users receive partial or no compensation.

Q: Are hardware wallets truly safer than exchange storage?Yes—hardware wallets keep private keys offline and never expose them to networked systems, eliminating remote attack vectors inherent to exchange environments.

Q: What happens to my crypto if an exchange goes bankrupt?Crypto held on exchanges is typically classified as unsecured debt in bankruptcy court, meaning users join long queues behind secured lenders and operational creditors.

Q: Do I need technical expertise to manage self-custody?No—modern wallet interfaces abstract complexity while preserving cryptographic ownership; seed phrase backup and basic verification steps are sufficient for secure control.