Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
Volume(24h): $157.21B 50.24%
Fear & Greed Index:

38 - Fear

  • Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
  • Volume(24h): $157.21B 50.24%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top Cryptospedia

Select Language

Select Language

Select Currency

Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos

How to calculate the tracking error of ETH ETFs? (Performance gap)

Tracking error in ETH ETFs measures annualized volatility of daily return gaps between the fund and its benchmark (e.g., CME CF Ether-Dollar Rate), reflecting fees, custody limits, futures roll yield, and arbitrage efficiency.

Jan 07, 2026 at 09:59 am

Understanding Tracking Error in ETH ETFs

1. Tracking error quantifies the deviation between an ETH ETF’s net asset value or market price and the spot price of Ethereum over a defined period.

2. It is typically expressed as the annualized standard deviation of daily return differences between the fund and its underlying benchmark — usually the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate or a similar regulated spot index.

3. A low tracking error signals tight replication, while elevated values may indicate structural friction, fees, rebalancing lags, or regulatory constraints affecting fund operations.

4. Unlike traditional equity ETFs, ETH ETFs face unique challenges including custody limitations, settlement delays, and exposure to futures-based synthetic strategies in pre-spot approval phases.

Data Sources and Benchmark Selection

1. Accurate calculation requires synchronized time-series data: ETF NAV (published daily by the issuer), ETF closing market price (from primary exchange listings), and the official reference rate for ETH/USD.

2. The CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate is widely adopted by SEC-registered ETH ETFs as their stated benchmark due to its transparency, auditability, and multi-exchange aggregation methodology.

3. Some funds disclose secondary benchmarks such as CoinDesk ETH Price Index or Kraken Spot Index — discrepancies across sources can materially affect computed error if not consistently applied.

4. Timestamp alignment matters: all prices must be sampled at identical intervals (e.g., 4:00 PM ET) to avoid artificial volatility from temporal misalignment.

Mathematical Framework

1. Compute daily return differential: ETF_daily_return − Benchmark_daily_return.

2. Collect these differentials over a rolling window — commonly 60 or 90 trading days — to capture recent behavior without excessive noise.

3. Calculate the standard deviation of that series, then annualize using the square root of 252: Annualized Tracking Error = StdDev(daily_differentials) × √252.

4. Alternative metrics include absolute tracking difference (ATD), which measures mean absolute deviation rather than volatility, offering insight into directional bias.

Structural Drivers of Divergence

1. Expense ratios directly subtract from returns; a 0.25% fee compounds daily and widens cumulative divergence versus spot performance.

2. Authorized participants’ arbitrage efficiency affects premium/discount dynamics — persistent premiums inflate market-price-based tracking error even when NAV tracks closely.

3. Futures roll yield impacts physically-unbacked products; contango environments erode returns relative to spot, especially in leveraged or long-dated exposure structures.

4. Tax withholding on staking rewards — where applicable — introduces unanticipated drag if the ETF distributes yield net of jurisdictional levies not reflected in the benchmark.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Does tracking error include bid-ask spread impact?Tracking error calculations based on closing prices do not incorporate intraday liquidity costs. Bid-ask spread effects manifest more clearly in realized investor returns, especially for large orders executed off-market close.

Q: Can tracking error be negative?No — tracking error is a standard deviation metric and therefore always non-negative. However, the underlying return differential series can contain both positive and negative values, indicating periods of outperformance and underperformance.

Q: Why might two ETH ETFs tracking the same benchmark show different tracking errors?Differences arise from distinct portfolio construction methods — full physical backing versus partial cash-collateralized structures, varying custodial arrangements, dividend reinvestment timing, and internal hedging protocols.

Q: Is tracking error reported before or after fees?Official tracking error figures disclosed by issuers are calculated post-fee, as they reflect actual NAV changes net of management expenses, custody charges, and other operational deductions.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Related knowledge

See all articles

User not found or password invalid

Your input is correct