由于对其生态系统和 VET 代币实用性的担忧不断增加，唯链面临社区强烈反对

唯链是一家领先的以企业为中心的区块链，由于对其生态系统及其原生代币 VET 实用性的担忧，正面临社区越来越严格的审查。

Enterprise blockchain VeChain is facing closer examination by its community over the state of its ecosystem and the use case for its native token, VET. Speaking on X about the blockchain firm’s recent decisions and weak tokenomics, Progetto Bridge co-founder Andrea Mortarotti voiced some concerns.

企业区块链唯链正面临社区对其生态系统状况及其原生代币 VET 用例的更密切审查。 Progetto Bridge 联合创始人 Andrea Mortarotti 在 X 上谈到区块链公司最近的决策和疲软的代币经济学时表达了一些担忧。

VeChain Faces Backlash from Community One of the main concerns raised is about the VeBetterDAO (VBD) initiative. This initiative aims to promote sustainability by using decentralized applications (dApps) like Mugshot, Cleanify, Greencart, and Non-Fungible Book Club, as reported by CNF. However, many in the community feel that it has shifted the focus away from the core issues surrounding the VET ecosystem.

唯链面临社区的强烈反对 引起的主要担忧之一是 VeBetterDAO (VBD) 计划。据 CNF 报道，该计划旨在通过使用 Mugshot、Cleanify、Greencart 和 Non-Fungible Book Club 等去中心化应用程序 (dApp) 来促进可持续性。然而，社区中的许多人认为这已经将焦点从围绕 VET 生态系统的核心问题转移开。

Mortarotti highlights how the launch of VeBetterDAO has overshadowed the need to address the utility and value proposition of the VET token. Despite the development of new projects, VET’s role within the ecosystem has remained limited, sparking questions about its long-term value for users and investors.

Mortarotti 强调了 VeBetterDAO 的推出如何掩盖了解决 VET 代币实用性和价值主张的需求。尽管开发了新项目，但 VET 在生态系统中的作用仍然有限，引发了人们对其对用户和投资者的长期价值的质疑。

Another key issue that was brought up is that the low cost of VeThor (VTHO), the gas token used to power transactions, allows companies to use VeChain’s technology without holding significant amounts of VET. In many cases, VTHO is sponsored by VeChain itself, eliminating the need for businesses to hold $VET.

提出的另一个关键问题是，VeThor（VTHO）（用于为交易提供动力的燃料代币）成本低廉，允许公司在不持有大量 VET 的情况下使用唯链的技术。在许多情况下，VTHO 由唯链本身赞助，从而消除了企业持有 $VET 的需要。

This practice has left the community wondering, “Why hold $VET?” While VeChain’s management has pointed to partnerships and increased adoption as reasons to hold VET,

这种做法让社区产生疑问：“为什么持有 $VET？”虽然唯链管理层指出合作伙伴关系和增加采用率是持有 VET 的原因，

VET holders can also generate VTHO and participate in governance. However, some argue that these benefits alone are not enough to drive demand for the token as private companies continue to use the technology without VET. As Mortarotti puts it,

VET 持有者还可以生成 VTHO 并参与治理。然而，一些人认为，仅这些好处并不足以推动对代币的需求，因为私营公司在没有 VET 的情况下继续使用该技术。正如莫塔罗蒂所说，

This disconnect between VeChain’s ecosystem growth and VET’s utility limits the token’s appreciation potential and reduces its strategic importance.

唯链生态系统发展与 VET 效用之间的脱节限制了该代币的升值潜力并降低了其战略重要性。

Concerns over Governance Structure VeChain’s governance structure has also come under fire, with critics questioning the influence of Authority Nodes. Due to the anonymity of these nodes and their potential links to private companies, the community has expressed concerns about decentralization. If a majority of these nodes are controlled by VeChain and its private partners, some fear that it could lead to centralization.

对治理结构的担忧唯链的治理结构也受到批评，批评者质疑权威节点的影响力。由于这些节点的匿名性及其与私营公司的潜在联系，社区对权力下放表示担忧。如果这些节点中的大多数由唯链及其私人合作伙伴控制，一些人担心这可能会导致中心化。

Furthermore, the launch of the VeBetterDAO has raised questions about the allocation of funds, with Mortarotti suspecting that resources may have been used for unapproved purposes without consulting the governance committee and node operators.

此外，VeBetterDAO 的推出引发了有关资金分配的问题，Mortarotti 怀疑资源可能在未咨询治理委员会和节点运营商的情况下被用于未经批准的目的。

One commenter noted that VeChain’s tokenomics makes it “a poor choice” for investors due to the low gas fees and oversupply of VET. In response, Mortarotti said, “Lowering the cost of gas would have made sense with real mass adoption and not with an assumption of adoption and expiring contracts with giants like DNV.”

一位评论者指出，由于较低的 Gas 费用和 VET 的供应过剩，唯链的代币经济学使其成为投资者的“糟糕选择”。对此，莫塔罗蒂表示：“降低天然气成本对于真正大规模采用是有意义的，而不是假设采用并与 DNV 等巨头的合同到期。”

He also highlighted the need for a clear strategy from VeChain’s private and third-party companies regarding VET and VTHO tokens. According to Mortarotti, “Private and third-party companies, if run by foundation members, should have had a well-defined plan of action for VET and VTHO tokens, thus incentivizing purchase and retention.”

他还强调唯链的私人和第三方公司需要就 VET 和 VTHO 代币制定明确的战略。 Mortarotti 表示，“如果由基金会成员运营，私人和第三方公司应该对 VET 和 VTHO 代币制定明确的行动计划，从而激励购买和保留。”