英国上诉法院驳回了针对加密货币交易所二手的133亿美元的集体诉讼

它遵循英格兰和威尔士解雇（10页/190 kb）的上诉法院，其中大部分针对加密货币交易所二进制的133亿美元集体诉讼。

The Court of Appeal of England and Wales has dismissed the bulk of a $13.3 billion class action against crypto exchange Binance.

英格兰和威尔士上诉法院驳回了针对加密货币交易所二手票的133亿美元集体诉讼。

The case, which began in 2019 when several major cryptocurrency exchanges colluded to delist Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV), has been closely watched by the legal community. The claimants, who include both immediate and indirect investors in BSV, argued that the delisting breached article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and/or the UK Competition Act 1998.

该案始于2019年，当时与法律界密切关注了与Delist Bitcoin Satoshi Vision（BSV）合谋的几次主要加密货币交易所（BSV）。索赔人在BSV中都包括直接和间接投资者，他认为，违反了《欧盟和/或英国竞争法案》 1998年《欧盟运作条约》第101条的违反条款。

The lower court, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), declined to strike out the claims entirely but narrowed its scope. The sub-classes appealed to the Court of Appeal, arguing that the CAT was wrong to find that the market mitigation rule applied to all the claims.

下级法院，竞赛上诉法庭（CAT）拒绝完全罢免索赔，但范围缩小了其范围。子类呼吁上诉法院，认为猫发现市场缓解规则适用于所有索赔是错误的。

The upper court dismissed the majority of the appeal, ruling that the damages claimed were speculative and unsupported. The court also found that BSV was tradeable and substitutable, and the investors therefore had a duty to mitigate losses by selling in an open market.

上法院驳回了上诉的大部分，裁定所声称的损害赔偿是投机性和不支持的。法院还认为，BSV是可交易和替代的，因此投资者有责任通过在公开市场上出售来减轻损失。

The Court of Appeal rejected the foregone growth argument, stating that the claim that BSV could have grown in value like bitcoin was speculative and not legally recoverable. The loss of chance argument was also rejected because the claim did not depend on third-party decisions but on speculative market growth.

上诉法院拒绝了已被禁止的增长论点，称BSV可以像比特币这样的价值增长的主张是投机性的，而在法律上不可恢复。偶然论证的丧失也被拒绝，因为该主张不依赖第三方决定，而是基于投机性市场的增长。

Finally, the Court of Appeal found that, in terms of awareness of delisting, only those unaware of the delisting might have a claim beyond immediate loss. This means that sub-class B holders can only claim immediate loss, for instance £55 to £39 – not speculative future gains.

最后，上诉法院发现，就意识而言，只有那些不了解偏见的人可能会超出立即损失的索赔。这意味着子级B持有人只能立即造成损失，例如55英镑至39英镑 - 不是投机性的未来收益。

Jennifer Craven, litigation expert at Pinsent Masons, said: “The court’s confirmation that the market mitigation rules should apply to readily tradeable digital assets should now limit exchanges’ exposure to massive speculative liability claims following the delisting decision.”

Pinsent Masons的诉讼专家Jennifer Craven表示：“法院确认市场缓解规则应适用于易于交易的可交易数字资产，现在应将交易所限制为在裁定决定后的大规模投机责任索赔。”

While the scope of the case was significantly narrowed, smaller claims from investors who lost access or sold currency at a loss may still proceed.

尽管此案的范围大大缩小了，但仍可能继续进行损失或出售货币的投资者的较小索赔。