中本聪功能引发争论：比特币社区因未发现的密钥而存在分歧

Bitcoin Core v30 更新重新引发了社区对中本聪功能 OP_RETURN 的争论。这个“未发现的钥匙”是向前迈出的一步还是失误？

The Bitcoin community is buzzing, and not necessarily in harmony. The latest Bitcoin Core v30 update has stirred up a hornet's nest, specifically concerning OP_RETURN, a feature with roots tracing back to Satoshi Nakamoto himself. Let's dive into the drama surrounding this 'Satoshi feature' and why it's causing such a ruckus.

比特币社区热闹非凡，但并不一定和谐。最新的 Bitcoin Core v30 更新已经捅了马蜂窝，特别是关于 OP_RETURN，这个功能的根源可以追溯到中本聪本人。让我们深入探讨一下围绕“中本聪特征”的戏剧性事件，以及它为何引起如此大的骚动。

OP_RETURN: An Old Key, New Controversy

OP_RETURN：旧钥匙，新争议

The heart of the matter lies in the increased OP_RETURN limit. For those not in the know, OP_RETURN allows users to attach extra data to Bitcoin transactions. While many believe Bitcoin Core 0.9.0 introduced it, Adam Back clarifies that OP_RETURN is a 'Satoshi feature,' dating back 15 years. The v30 update bumps the "datacarriersize" to 100,000 bytes, removing the old 80-byte limit. While Bitcoin Core v30 update includes TRUC transaction support, among others, the fact that it removes a limit on transaction data, increasing it to 100,000 bytes, as well as the OP_Return limit of 80 bytes, might not sit well with some members of the community.

问题的核心在于增加的 OP_RETURN 限制。对于那些不知道的人来说，OP_RETURN 允许用户将额外的数据附加到比特币交易中。虽然许多人认为比特币核心 0.9.0 引入了它，但 Adam Back 澄清说 OP_RETURN 是一个“中本聪功能”，可以追溯到 15 年前。 v30 更新将“数据载体大小”提高到 100,000 字节，取消了旧的 80 字节限制。虽然 Bitcoin Core v30 更新包括 TRUC 交易支持等，但它取消了交易数据的限制，将其增加到 100,000 字节，以及 OP_Return 80 字节的限制，这一事实可能会让社区的一些成员感到不舒服。

Community Split: Upgrade or Downgrade?

社区分裂：升级还是降级？

Not everyone's thrilled with this change. Bitcoin pioneer Nick Szabo even advises against upgrading to Core v30, suggesting users stick with Knots as a temporary fix. The core of the contention seems to be the perceived bloat and potential misuse of the increased data allowance. Some fear it could lead to the blockchain being clogged with irrelevant data.

并非所有人都对这一变化感到兴奋。比特币先驱 Nick Szabo 甚至建议不要升级到 Core v30，建议用户坚持使用 Knots 作为临时解决方案。争论的核心似乎是增加的数据限额所带来的臃肿和潜在的滥用。一些人担心这可能会导致区块链被不相关的数据堵塞。

Adam Back's Perspective

亚当·贝克的观点

Blockstream CEO Adam Back, a prominent figure in the Bitcoin world, weighed in, emphasizing the historical significance of OP_RETURN as a feature conceived by Satoshi himself. This highlights a fundamental question: Is this an intentional unlocking of potential, or an accidental release of chaos?

比特币世界的知名人物、Blockstream 首席执行官 Adam Back 也发表了看法，强调 OP_RETURN 作为中本聪本人构思的功能的历史意义。这凸显了一个基本问题：这是有意释放潜力，还是无意释放混乱？

My Two Satoshis

我的两个中本聪

The OP_RETURN debate reflects a broader tension within the Bitcoin community: the balance between innovation and stability. While expanding functionality can open doors to new applications, it also introduces risks. Perhaps a more gradual approach, with safeguards against abuse, would have been a smoother sell. I think that Bitcoin's history, is a testament to the power of decentralized consensus. Whether this uncovered 'key' unlocks a brighter future or leads to unforeseen consequences remains to be seen. The community's response will undoubtedly shape Bitcoin's trajectory.

OP_RETURN 争论反映了比特币社区内部更广泛的紧张局势：创新与稳定之间的平衡。虽然扩展功能可以为新应用打开大门，但它也带来了风险。也许采取更渐进的方法，并采取防止滥用的措施，销售会更顺利。我认为比特币的历史证明了去中心化共识的力量。这把未被发现的“钥匙”是否会开启更光明的未来，还是会导致不可预见的后果，还有待观察。社区的反应无疑将塑造比特币的发展轨迹。

Stay Tuned!

敬请关注！

So, there you have it! Another day, another Bitcoin drama. The 'Satoshi feature' debate rages on, and it's bound to keep the community engaged for a while. Buckle up, folks; it's going to be an interesting ride!

所以，你就有了！又一天，又一场比特币戏剧。 “中本聪特征”的争论愈演愈烈，这必然会让社区持续参与一段时间。各位，系好安全带；这将是一次有趣的旅程！