开发人员因对比特币核心的有争议的变化而战

由于彼得·托德

A heated debate has erupted among Bitcoin developers over a controversial change to the dominant software for full nodes, Bitcoin Core. Since Peter Todd formalized a proposal to remove data limits via OP_Return’s datacarrier outputs, the temperature of discussions rose to incendiary levels on X, GitHub, and the Google Group mailing list.

比特币开发人员在对全节点（Bitcoin Core的主要软件）的有争议的变化中爆发了激烈的辩论。由于彼得·托德（Peter Todd）正式通过OP_Return的DataCarrier输出删除数据限制的建议，因此讨论的温度上升到X，GitHub和Google组邮件列表上的燃烧水平。

Less than 48 hours since Protos wrote about this topic, disagreement among developers has skyrocketed. Indeed, it seems like almost every Bitcoin influencer on X and GitHub wants to have their say about what is ostensibly innocuous increase to OP_Return’s 83-byte data limit.

自Protos写有关此主题的文章以来不到48小时，开发人员之间的分歧飙升。确实，似乎几乎所有X和Github上的比特币影响者都希望对OP_ReTurn的83字节数据限制的表面上无害。

The hashtag #FixTheFilters is trending, Bitcoin maximalists are pulling receipts on altcoin promoters, and startups are vying for technological support for their project. In short, the discussion is chaotic and enthralling.

#FixTheFilters主题标签是趋势，比特币的最大主义者正在拔起替代币启动子的收据，而初创企业正在争夺其项目的技术支持。简而言之，讨论是混乱而令人着迷的。

After Peter Todd opened the discussion about pull request (PR) 32359, at least four camps have formed around distinct viewpoints.

彼得·托德（Peter Todd）开放有关拉的请求（PR）32359的讨论之后，至少四个营地围绕着不同的观点形成。

First, the group advocating for a higher OP_Return data limit is trying to explain the limit’s ineffectiveness and its futility amid plentiful alternatives for data storage elsewhere within blocks.

首先，提倡更高OP_RETURN数据限制的小组试图解释限制的无效性及其徒劳性，因为在块中其他地方的数据存储方面有很多替代方案。

Second, the opposition is arguing for the limit to remain — usually by alleging that storing arbitrary data via OP_Return violates Satoshi Nakamoto’s intent and the purpose of Bitcoin as a financial network.

其次，反对派主张将限制保留 - 通常是指声称通过OP_Return存储任意数据违反了Nakamoto的意图和比特币作为财务网络的目的。

Third, onlookers, as well as members of the above camps, are criticising the good faith of interlocutors’ arguments, producing historical receipts and airing dirty laundry of supposedly ulterior motives.

第三，围观者以及上述营地的成员批评对话者的论点的真诚，产生历史收入并播放据称是别有用心的肮脏的洗衣店。

Finally, otherwise undecided observers are concerned with the moderation and platforming of the debate itself, blaming administrators for censoring speech.

最后，否则不确定的观察者会关注辩论本身的适度和平台，这将管理员责备了审查语音的管理员。

Read More: Luke Dashjr calls Ordinals a spam ‘bug’ that should be ‘fixed’

阅读更多：卢克·达什（Luke Dashjr

Four camps argue about relaxing OP_Return for non-financial dataA member of the first camp, Chaincode Labs’ Antoine Poinsot, suggested lifting the OP_Return data limit. Not only did Poinsot note that arbitrary data storage is available elsewhere within blocks, he also highlighted that OP_Return data doesn’t benefit from the SegWit discount.

四个阵营争辩说，对于第一营的非财务数据成员，Chaincode Labs的Antoine Pooinsot放宽了OP_Return，建议取消OP_Return数据限制。 Puinsot不仅指出，任意数据存储在块中的其他地方可用，而且还强调说，OP_Return数据并不能从SEGWIT折扣中受益。

In other words, if people want to inscribe media via OP_Return, they have to pay fully-priced transaction fees.

换句话说，如果人们想通过OP_Return铭刻媒体，则必须支付全价交易费用。

Leading the opposition from the second camp, Luke Dashjr and Bitcoin Mechanic explained why the limit should not only remain in place but tighten further. In their typical, fiery communication style, their camp argued for filtering “spam” data from Bitcoin’s ledger and protecting the network as a non-fiat alternative that resists corporate subversion.

卢克·达什吉（Luke Dashjr）和比特币机械师（Luke Dashjr）和比特币机械师（Bitcoin Mechangic）领导了对手，这解释了为什么极限不仅应该保持到位，而且还要进一步拧紧。他们的营地以典型的，火热的沟通方式主张过滤比特币分类帐中的“垃圾邮件”数据，并保护网络作为抵抗公司颠覆的非备用替代方案。

Someone pushing for a major change to Bitcoin is affiliated with a company whose current exploit of Bitcoin was the motivation for the change.Pointing this out on the github discussion has resulted in me being banned.https://t.co/VAaNByBE5o

有人向比特币进行重大更改的人是隶属于一家公司的公司，该公司目前对比特币的利用是进行更改的动机。在GitHub讨论中将其列出导致我被禁止。

— Bitcoin Mechanic (@TheChainCoin) August 17, 2023

- 2023年8月17日，比特币机械师（@thechaincoin）

Exemplifying the third camp, someone flagged Jameson Lopp’s conflict of interest in an attempt to discredit his argument for data storage leniency. “I think it would be appropriate for you to disclose that you’re one of the VCs backing Citrea,” they pointed out.

有人举例说明了第三个训练营，有人标记了詹姆森·洛普（Jameson Lopp）的利益冲突，试图抹黑他关于数据存储宽大处理的论点。他们指出：“我认为您可以透露您是VCS支持Citrea之一是适当的。”

Citrea is a for-profit project that publishes zero-knowledge (ZK) data onto Bitcoin’s blockchain and could benefit from lifting OP_Return’s 83-byte threshold.

Citrea是一个营利性项目，将零知识（ZK）数据发布到比特币的区块链上，可以从提升OP_Return的83字节阈值中受益。

Others criticised founders and advisors to Taproot Wizards, including pseudonymous Bitcoin influencers who advise the project like Shinobi and Rijndael, due to the project’s support for non-financial inscriptions.

其他人则批评了Taproot向导的创始人和顾问，包括该项目对非金融铭文的支持，包括诸如Shinobi和Rijndael这样的项目的化名比特币影响者。

Finally, members of the fourth camp criticised the moderation of the discussion itself on GitHub. They likened the moderators to a “cabal of self-appointed politicians” who flagged comments as abusive simply because they pointed out subtext behind arguments.

最后，第四阵营的成员批评了Github上的讨论本身的适度。他们将主持人比作“自任命的政治家”的“集会”，他们将评论称为虐待，仅仅是因为他们指出了争论背后的潜台词。

Spamming or storing data: A matter of perspectiveNon-financial data storage on Bitcoin has existed since the genesis block. Satoshi inscribed a newspaper headline into the first block, and Luke Dashjr inscribed Catholic prayers to the ledger in 2014.

垃圾邮件或存储数据：自创世纪块以来，已经存在了比特币上的透视金财务数据存储问题。 Satoshi将报纸标题刻在第一个街区，卢克·达什（Luke Dashjr）在2014年向莱杰（Ledger）刻有天主教祈祷。

As a matter of norms-setting for modern use, however, Bitcoin Core could be in the process of relaxing a standard relaying protocol that previously limited OP_RETURN data to 83 bytes.

但是，作为现代用途的规范制定，比特币核心可能正在放松标准继电器协议，该协议以前将OP_RET_RETERN数据限制在83个字节中。

Rather than a few curiosities of early experimentation, this week’s change could allow a considerable quantity of non-financial data to relay easily between nodes. Thereafter, the relaxed limit would become commonplace for mining mempools to estimate fees and prioritise transactions.

本周的变化不是早期实验的一些好奇心，可以使大量的非财务数据在节点之间轻松中继。此后，放松的限制将成为采矿孟买估计费用和优先交易的司空见惯。

This week’s change, therefore, could have lasting effects on block production, templates, and the proliferation of UTXOs.

因此，本周的变化可能会对阻塞产量，模板和UTXOS的扩散产生持久影响。

The debate about compressing pictures, movies, video games, and other non-financial data onto Bitcoin’s ledger erupted a few years ago during an exploit of Taproot for on-chain data inscriptions.

关于将图片，电影，视频游戏和其他非财务数据压缩到比特币的分类帐上的辩论在几年前爆发了Taproot的链接链数据铭文。

Once again, the same debate is roaring back over this week’s controversial proposal

再次，同样的辩论是在本周有争议的提议中咆哮