一家加密初创公司曾经被誉为新星，现在面临动荡

在泄露的文件暴露了秘密的秘密保证向内部人士承诺，由唐纳德·特朗普的世界自由金融支持的运动实验室，据称签署了阴影协议

A crypto startup once touted as a rising star is now facing turmoil after leaked documents exposed secret token promises to insiders, deepening scrutiny of a scandal-plagued firm.

一家加密货币初创公司曾经被吹捧为后起之秀，现在泄露的文件暴露了秘密的秘密令牌向内部人士承诺，加深了对丑闻塑造的公司的审查。

Movement Labs, backed by Donald Trump’s World Liberty Financial, signed shadow agreements granting select advisers access to up to 10% of its MOVE token supply—deals never disclosed to investors, according to internal memos accessed by DeCrypt. These memos, detailing a series of agreements reached in late 2023, highlight how Movement quietly pledged millions in tokens to early supporters.

唐纳德·特朗普（Donald Trump）的世界自由金融（World Liberty Financial）支持的运动实验室签署了影子协议，授予精选顾问的访问权限，最多可访问其搬迁令牌供应量的10％ - 根据解密的内部备忘录，从未向投资者披露。这些备忘录详细介绍了2023年下半年达成的一系列协议，突出了运动如何悄悄地诺言将令牌列入代币到早期的支持者。

Two agreements show adviser Sam Thapaliya, described by employees as a 'shadow co-founder,' would gain access to 7.5% of MOVE’s total supply—potentially worth over $50 million at launch—in exchange for strategic input. Another deal promised consultant Vinit Parekh nearly $2 million annually, also in exchange for advice. Both arrangements were labelled ‘non-binding’ by Movement, yet clauses required mutual consent to terminate.

两项协议表明，顾问Sam Thapaliya被员工描述为“影子联合创始人”，将获得Move总供应量的7.5％（在启动时价值超过5000万美元），以换取战略投入。另一项交易承诺，顾问Vinit Parekh每年将近200万美元，以换取建议。这两种布置都被运动标记为“无约束力”，但条款需要相互同意才能终止。

Thapaliya maintains these deals, never announced publicly, remain valid and he plans legal action to claim his due share of tokens. “I fulfilled my obligations,” said Thapaliya, highlighting his role in selecting market-makers and advising on token strategy.

Thapaliya保持这些交易，从未公开宣布，保持有效，他计划法律行动，要求其应有的代币份额。塔帕利亚（Thapaliya）说：“我履行了自己的义务，”他强调了他在选择营销商和为代币战略提供建议方面的作用。

However, Movement has insisted these agreements were exploratory in nature, and the signatures and termination disputes suggest the startup is now embroiled in a legal battle to avoid fulfilling the commitments.

但是，运动坚持认为这些协议本质上是探索性的，签名和终止纠纷表明该创业公司现在卷入法律斗争，以避免履行承诺。

Founders at Odds

创始人矛盾

The fallout has also ignited a public feud between Movement co-founders Rushi Manche and Cooper Scanlon. Manche, who was ousted as COO in May, has shifted blame for the controversial deals onto Scanlon, claiming his early decisions shaped the launch.

辐射还引发了运动联合创始人Rushi Manche和Cooper Scanlon之间的公开争执。曼彻（Manche）在五月份被罢免为首席运营官，他将有争议的交易归咎于斯坎伦（Scanlon），声称他的早期决定塑造了发射。

"We can see that Cooper approved the terms of the agreement with Web3Port, despite legal counsel's warnings," Manche said in a statement, referring to a partnership that unfolded disastrously.

Manche在一份声明中说：“尽管法律顾问的警告，库珀还是批准了与Web3Port的协议条款。”

Scanlon, who has since stepped down as CEO but remains with the company, has kept silent amid the accusations. Tensions escalated after a leaked Thapaliya agreement surfaced online, prompting Manche to highlight Scanlon’s signature.

从那以后，斯坎伦（Scanlon）担任首席执行官，但仍留在公司，他一直在指控中保持沉默。泄漏的Thapaliya协议在网上浮出水面后，紧张局势升级，促使Manche突出了Scanlon的签名。

Employees describe Thapaliya as a key strategist, frequently consulted on major decisions including the partnership with Chinese market maker Web3Port. That deal, which unfolded disastrously and led to Binance's intervention, was tied to a $38 million token dump and a 50% price crash, ultimately sparking furious reactions from investors.

员工将Thapaliya描述为主要战略家，经常就与中国市政公司Web3Port的合作关系在内的重大决策进行咨询。这项交易灾难性地展开并导致了Binance的干预，与3800万美元的代币垃圾场和50％的价格崩溃有关，最终引发了投资者的愤怒反应。

Movement's partnership with Web3Port lies at the heart of its unravelling. Documents seen by DeCrypt show the startup loaned 5% of MOVE’s supply to Web3Port, an allocation mirroring Thapaliya's in the leaked agreement. In return, Web3Port would provide liquidity and market-making services for MOVE.

运动与Web3Port的合作关系是其揭开的核心。解密的文件显示，该创业公司借给Move 3 Web3Port的5％，这是一种反映了Thapaliya在泄露协议中的分配。作为回报，Web3Port将为移动提供流动性和营销服务。

However, Web3Port massively overbid on the token during launch on May 10, quickly exhausting the assigned portion of funds. After the partnership soured, the market maker flooded exchanges with sell orders, triggering panic among investors and leading to several having their accounts banned.

但是，在5月10日发布期间，Web3Port在令牌上大大超越了代币，迅速耗尽了分配的资金部分。合伙企业变酸后，做市商以卖出订单淹没了交流，引发了投资者的恐慌，并导致其中一些被禁止了帐户。

Analysts at the time called the terms of the deal "predatory" and accused Web3Port of pump-and-dump tactics, adding that Movement appeared to ignore several red flags. Legal counsel YK Pek was reportedly among those warning that the Web3Port partnership was "possibly the worst agreement" ever seen, yet revised terms were later approved by Scanlon, raising concerns of self-dealing.

当时的分析师称这笔交易的条款为“掠夺性”，并指责Web3Port泵送策略，并补充说，运动似乎忽略了几个危险信号。据报道，法律顾问YK PEK被警告说，Web3Port Partnership是“可能是最糟糕的协议”，但经过修订的条款后来得到了Scanlon的批准，引起了人们对自我交易的担忧。

Investigators later found that Web3Port shared directors with Movement's foundation, further complicating issues of accountability.

调查人员随后发现Web3Port与Movers的基础共享导演，这进一步使问责制的问题变得复杂。

Investor trust in Movement evaporated rapidly as the startup's token price plunged and Coinbase halted trading on May 15, citing "routine review." By that point, MOVE had already crashed to $0.18, a staggering 80% drop from its peak.

投资者对运动的信任迅速蒸发，因为该初创公司的代币价格下跌并于5月15日停止了交易，理由是“常规审查”。到那时，Move已经撞到了0.18美元，从其峰值下降了80％。

Binance also froze $38 million in funds linked to Web3Port's massive sell-off, while daily active addresses on the token fell to just 1,200.

Binance还冻结了3800万美元的资金，与Web3Port的大量抛售有关，而代币的每日活跃地址下降至1200。

In response, Movement has since rebranded as Move Industries and pledged transparency, launching a $38 million buyback program to stabilise liquidity and announcing audits by firm Groom Lake to address governance gaps. However, skeptics question whether these steps will be enough to salvage the startup's battered reputation.

作为回应，运动自那以后，将其重新命名为“移动行业”并承诺透明度，启动了3800万美元的回购计划，以稳定流动性并宣布新郎湖公司的审计解决治理差距。但是，怀疑论者质疑这些步骤是否足以挽救创业公司受虐的声誉。

The scandal also highlights broader systemic issues in crypto's opaque token ecosystems. Informal deals, like Movement's undisclosed MOUs with Thapaliya and Parekh, allow startups to funnel wealth to insiders without sufficient oversight from investors or regulatory bodies.

该丑闻还强调了加密透明的代币生态系统中更广泛的系统性问题。非正式交易，例如运动与塔帕利亚（Thapaliya）和帕雷克（Parekh）的未公开的穆斯特（Mous），允许初创企业将财富渠道向内部人士渠道，而没有投资者或监管机构的足够监督。

Several other cases, such as Eclipse's scrapped deal with Polychain, have come to light, showing how large-scale token projects often promise huge, undisclosed allocations of their tokens to VIPs and early backers, ultimately shaping market dynamics in ways that are never disclosed to the broader community.

其他几个案件，例如Eclipse与PolyChain的报废交易，已经揭示了，表明了代币的大规模代币项目经常承诺将其代币分配给VIP和早期支持者的大量，未公开的分配，最终以从未向广泛社区披露的方式塑造市场动态。

With authorities now circling major

当局现在盘旋