克雷格·赖特不是比特币创造者中本聪

这位难以捉摸的比特币创始人的身份仍然是加密货币领域最大的谜团之一，因为中本聪的模仿者克雷格赖特公开承认自己不是比特币的创造者。

Australian computer scientist Craig Wright has publicly recanted his statements claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, following a court verdict finding him guilty of making false claims and committing forgery.

澳大利亚计算机科学家克雷格·赖特 (Craig Wright) 公开撤销了他自称是比特币化名创造者中本聪 (Satoshi Nakamoto) 的声明，此前法院判决他犯有虚假声明和伪造罪。

The identity of Bitcoin’s founder has remained one of the crypto space’s biggest mysteries, with Wright being among the figures who have claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto. However, in a recent development, the self-proclaimed Bitcoin creator has confessed to not being the creator of Bitcoin.

比特币创始人的身份仍然是加密货币领域最大的谜团之一，赖特就是自称中本聪的人物之一。然而，在最近的事态发展中，这位自称比特币创造者的人承认自己不是比特币的创造者。

In a legal notice posted on his personal website, Wright announced his false claims. The notice reveals that on May 20, 2024, the High Court of England and Wales found Wright to be dishonest in his assertions that he is the person behind “the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.”

赖特在其个人网站上发布的法律声明中宣布了他的虚假主张。该通知显示，2024 年 5 月 20 日，英格兰和威尔士高等法院发现赖特在声称自己是“化名中本聪”背后的人时不诚实。

The court also found that Wright lied “extensively and repeatedly” in his evidence, creating various false narratives in his attempt to bolster his false claims.

法院还发现，赖特在他的证据中“广泛且反复”撒谎，创造了各种虚假叙述，试图支持他的虚假主张。

Furthermore, the court found that Wright forged various documents and presented them as evidence in his defense to support his erroneous claims. As a result, the court denounced Wright’s actions as “a most serious abuse,” which inherently undermined the judicial processes of the courts of the United Kingdom (UK), Norway and the United States (US).

此外，法院还发现赖特伪造了各种文件，并将其作为辩护证据以支持他的错误主张。因此，法院谴责赖特的行为是“最严重的滥用职权”，这从本质上破坏了英国、挪威和美国法院的司法程序。

Following the denouncement, the High Court stated that Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin white paper, the foundational document outlining BTC’s principles and mechanics. They ruled that Wright is not the owner of the copyright to the Bitcoin white paper and not the author of the initial versions of the Bitcoin software.

谴责之后，高等法院表示，赖特不是比特币白皮书的作者，该白皮书是概述比特币原理和机制的基础文件。他们裁定赖特不是比特币白皮书版权的所有者，也不是比特币软件初始版本的作者。

Moreover, the High Court declared that Wright was not the person who adopted or operated under the pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto” in the period between 2008 and 2011 when BTC’s foundations were laid. The court has also rejected Wright’s assertions of being the creator of the Bitcoin system, dispelling any remaining doubt about his false role in creating Bitcoin.

此外，高等法院还宣布，赖特并不是在 2008 年至 2011 年 BTC 奠定基础期间以“中本聪”笔名采用或运营的人。法院还驳回了赖特关于自己是比特币系统创建者的说法，消除了人们对他在创建比特币过程中所扮演的虚假角色的任何疑虑。

Court Orders Strict Prohibitions On Wright

法院下令严格禁止赖特

In addition to the court’s clear-cut ruling on Wright’s false claims, several stringent conditions and measures have been imposed on the self-proclaimed Bitcoin creator to prevent further legal actions based on his previous discredited assertions.

除了法院对赖特的虚假主张作出明确裁决外，还对这位自称比特币创造者的人施加了几项严格的条件和措施，以防止基于他之前不可信的主张而采取进一步的法律行动。