比特币核心在审查下的主导地位，因为挑战

詹姆森·洛普（Jameson Lopp）是比特币最早的拥护者之一，也是加密社区中受人尊敬的声音，他对比特币核心（Bitcoin Core）在节点运营商中的压倒性主导地位引起了人们的关注。

In a post shared on X, Wednesday, Jameson Lopp, one of Bitcoin’s earliest supporters and a prominent voice in the crypto sphere, expressed his concerns regarding Bitcoin Core’s overwhelming dominance among node operators.

在周三分享的帖子中，詹姆森·洛普（Jameson Lopp）是比特币最早的支持者之一，也是加密货币领域的著名声音，他对比特币核心在节点运营商中压倒性的统治地位表示了担忧。

The freedom of node operators is to choose which implementation they run. The fact that 96% of nodes run Bitcoin Core is suboptimal IMO. Most alternative clients are either unmaintained or only maintained by a single developer, with no peer review.

节点操作员的自由是选择他们运行的实现。 96％的节点运行比特币核心的事实是IMO次优的IMO。大多数替代客户要么是没有单个开发人员的不太细长或仅维护的，而且没有同行评审。

— Jameson Lopp (@lopplopp) September 6, 2023

-Jameson Race（@lopplopp）2023年9月6日

"The freedom of node operators is to choose which implementation they run. The fact that 96% of nodes run Bitcoin Core is suboptimal IMO. Most alternative clients are either unmaintained or only maintained by a single developer, with no peer review," stated Lopp.

“节点运算符的自由是选择他们运行的实现。96％的节点运行比特币核心是次优的IMO。大多数替代客户端是无与伦比的，或者仅由单个开发人员维护，没有同行评审，” LOPP表示。

This comment, which has sparked discussion within the community, highlights a lesser-known aspect of decentralization at play.

这一评论引发了社区内部的讨论，突出了鲜为人知的权力下放的方面。

While the benefits of stability, consistency, and reliability offered by this standardization are evident, it also raises a potential single point of failure if vulnerabilities or bugs are discovered in the Core codebase.

尽管此标准化提供的稳定性，一致性和可靠性的好处是显而易见的，但如果在核心代码库中发现漏洞或错误，它也会引起潜在的单点故障。

"We need at least a couple of other well-maintained, multi-developer clients for optimal security and resilience of the Bitcoin network," Lopp added.

LOPP补充说：“我们至少需要其他维护良好的多开发器客户端，以实现比特币网络的最佳安全性和弹性。”

However, despite the bleak picture painted for non-Core implementations, Lopp highlighted two projects that are showing promise and could provide alternatives to Bitcoin Core. These projects are BRL and Bliz++

但是，尽管为非核心实施绘制了鲜明的图片，但LOPP强调了两个项目，这些项目表现出了希望，并且可以为比特币核心提供替代方案。这些项目是BRL和BLIZ ++

Both of these projects, although still lagging behind in adoption, are among the few viable options currently demonstrating sustained development outside the Bitcoin Core repository.

这两个项目虽然仍然落后于采用，却是目前证明比特币核心存储库以外持续发展的少数可行选择之一。

diversity in client software isn't just philosophical—it's practical. Having multiple implementations increases the network's resilience against bugs, exploits, or coordinated attacks. For example, Ethereum has benefited from having several well-maintained clients, which has helped avoid consensus-level issues during major upgrades.

客户软件的多样性不仅是哲学上的，而且是实用的。具有多种实现会增加网络对错误，利用或协调攻击的弹性。例如，以太坊从拥有几个维护良好的客户中受益，这有助于避免在重大升级期间共识级问题。

Lopp's warning isn't a call for a mass migration from Core, but rather a plea for more developer attention toward viable alternatives. As Bitcoin matures into a multi-trillion-dollar asset, the security of its underlying network—and the robustness of its software base—becomes even more crucial.

LOPP的警告不是呼吁从核心大规模迁移，而是要求更多开发人员对可行替代方案的关注。随着比特币成熟到数万亿美元的资产，其基础网络的安全性以及其软件基础的稳健性，更重要的是。

This post was originally published on Benzinga

该帖子最初发表在Benzinga上