比特幣核心在審查下的主導地位，因為挑戰

詹姆森·洛普（Jameson Lopp）是比特幣最早的擁護者之一，也是加密社區中受人尊敬的聲音，他對比特幣核心（Bitcoin Core）在節點運營商中的壓倒性主導地位引起了人們的關注。

In a post shared on X, Wednesday, Jameson Lopp, one of Bitcoin’s earliest supporters and a prominent voice in the crypto sphere, expressed his concerns regarding Bitcoin Core’s overwhelming dominance among node operators.

在周三分享的帖子中，詹姆森·洛普（Jameson Lopp）是比特幣最早的支持者之一，也是加密貨幣領域的著名聲音，他對比特幣核心在節點運營商中壓倒性的統治地位表示了擔憂。

The freedom of node operators is to choose which implementation they run. The fact that 96% of nodes run Bitcoin Core is suboptimal IMO. Most alternative clients are either unmaintained or only maintained by a single developer, with no peer review.

節點操作員的自由是選擇他們運行的實現。 96％的節點運行比特幣核心的事實是IMO次優的IMO。大多數替代客戶要么是沒有單個開發人員的不太細長或僅維護的，而且沒有同行評審。

— Jameson Lopp (@lopplopp) September 6, 2023

-Jameson Race（@lopplopp）2023年9月6日

"The freedom of node operators is to choose which implementation they run. The fact that 96% of nodes run Bitcoin Core is suboptimal IMO. Most alternative clients are either unmaintained or only maintained by a single developer, with no peer review," stated Lopp.

“節點運算符的自由是選擇他們運行的實現。96％的節點運行比特幣核心是次優的IMO。大多數替代客戶端是無與倫比的，或者僅由單個開發人員維護，沒有同行評審，” LOPP表示。

This comment, which has sparked discussion within the community, highlights a lesser-known aspect of decentralization at play.

這一評論引發了社區內部的討論，突出了鮮為人知的權力下放的方面。

While the benefits of stability, consistency, and reliability offered by this standardization are evident, it also raises a potential single point of failure if vulnerabilities or bugs are discovered in the Core codebase.

儘管此標準化提供的穩定性，一致性和可靠性的好處是顯而易見的，但如果在核心代碼庫中發現漏洞或錯誤，它也會引起潛在的單點故障。

"We need at least a couple of other well-maintained, multi-developer clients for optimal security and resilience of the Bitcoin network," Lopp added.

LOPP補充說：“我們至少需要其他維護良好的多開發器客戶端，以實現比特幣網絡的最佳安全性和彈性。”

However, despite the bleak picture painted for non-Core implementations, Lopp highlighted two projects that are showing promise and could provide alternatives to Bitcoin Core. These projects are BRL and Bliz++

但是，儘管為非核心實施繪製了鮮明的圖片，但LOPP強調了兩個項目，這些項目表現出了希望，並且可以為比特幣核心提供替代方案。這些項目是BRL和BLIZ ++

Both of these projects, although still lagging behind in adoption, are among the few viable options currently demonstrating sustained development outside the Bitcoin Core repository.

這兩個項目雖然仍然落後於採用，卻是目前證明比特幣核心存儲庫以外持續發展的少數可行選擇之一。

diversity in client software isn't just philosophical—it's practical. Having multiple implementations increases the network's resilience against bugs, exploits, or coordinated attacks. For example, Ethereum has benefited from having several well-maintained clients, which has helped avoid consensus-level issues during major upgrades.

客戶軟件的多樣性不僅是哲學上的，而且是實用的。具有多種實現會增加網絡對錯誤，利用或協調攻擊的彈性。例如，以太坊從擁有幾個維護良好的客戶中受益，這有助於避免在重大升級期間共識級問題。

Lopp's warning isn't a call for a mass migration from Core, but rather a plea for more developer attention toward viable alternatives. As Bitcoin matures into a multi-trillion-dollar asset, the security of its underlying network—and the robustness of its software base—becomes even more crucial.

LOPP的警告不是呼籲從核心大規模遷移，而是要求更多開發人員對可行替代方案的關注。隨著比特幣成熟到數万億美元的資產，其基礎網絡的安全性以及其軟件基礎的穩健性，更重要的是。

This post was originally published on Benzinga

該帖子最初發表在Benzinga上