AWS 故障震撼加密货币：Base 和 ETH L2 去中心化是一个神话吗？

2025 年 10 月 20 日的 AWS 中断暴露了加密货币的中心化风险，影响了 Base 和其他 ETH L2。真正的去中心化仅在 L1 上吗？

AWS Failure Shakes Crypto: Is Base and ETH L2 Decentralization a Myth?

AWS 故障震撼加密货币：Base 和 ETH L2 去中心化是一个神话吗？

The crypto world was reminded of a harsh reality on October 20, 2025: even decentralized systems rely on centralized infrastructure. A major Amazon Web Services (AWS) outage brought down significant portions of the crypto ecosystem, raising serious questions about the true level of decentralization in many popular platforms, especially Base and other ETH Layer 2 solutions.

2025 年 10 月 20 日，加密世界想起了一个残酷的现实：即使是去中心化的系统也依赖于中心化的基础设施。亚马逊网络服务 (AWS) 的一次重大故障导致了加密生态系统的很大一部分瘫痪，引发了人们对许多流行平台（尤其是 Base 和其他 ETH Layer 2 解决方案）的去中心化程度的严重质疑。

The AWS Outage: A Rude Awakening

AWS 宕机：猛烈的觉醒

The AWS failure wasn't just a minor inconvenience; it caused widespread service disruptions. Major players like Coinbase (and its Base layer-2 network), ConsenSys’ Infura, and Robinhood all suffered. This immediately sparked a wave of concern across the crypto community, with many pointing out the over-reliance on centralized infrastructure.

AWS 的故障不仅仅是一个小小的不便；它造成了广泛的服务中断。 Coinbase（及其 Base Layer-2 网络）、ConsenSys 的 Infura 和 Robinhood 等主要参与者都受到了影响。这立即引发了整个加密社区的担忧，许多人指出过度依赖中心化基础设施。

As Ben Schiller, Head of Communications at Miden, put it on X: "If your blockchain is down because of the AWS outage, you’re not sufficiently decentralized." Maggie Love, creator of SheFi, echoed this sentiment, stating, "If we cannot connect to Ethereum mainnet when AWS goes down, we are not decentralized."

正如 Miden 通信主管 Ben Schiller 在 X 上所说的那样：“如果您的区块链由于 AWS 中断而关闭，那么您的去中心化程度还不够。” SheFi 的创建者 Maggie Love 也赞同这一观点，她表示：“如果当 AWS 宕机时我们无法连接到以太坊主网，那么我们就不是去中心化的。”

Layer-2 Irony: Decentralized Execution, Centralized Infrastructure

第二层讽刺：去中心化执行，中心化基础设施

The incident highlighted a critical irony for Layer-2 networks like Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Linea, Scroll, and notably, Base. While these systems aim to decentralize execution and improve scalability, many still depend on centralized cloud services for their front-ends, onboarding processes, and API layers. The distributed consensus layers may remain intact, but the gateways users rely on go offline, amplifying the disruption.

该事件凸显了对 Polygon、Arbitrum、Optimism、Linea、Scroll 以及尤其是 Base 等第 2 层网络的重大讽刺。虽然这些系统旨在分散执行并提高可扩展性，但许多系统的前端、入门流程和 API 层仍然依赖集中式云服务。分布式共识层可能保持不变，但用户依赖的网关离线，从而加剧了破坏。

Chris Jenkins, lead of infrastructure operations at Pocket Network, aptly noted, "The AWS outage once again reminds us that blockchain, and really, the internet itself, is only as decentralized as the infrastructure it runs on."

Pocket Network 基础设施运营负责人 Chris Jenkins 恰如其分地指出：“AWS 中断再次提醒我们，区块链乃至互联网本身的去中心化程度取决于其运行的基础设施。”

The Case for Layer-1 Resilience

第一层弹性的案例

The outage also strengthened the argument for building and operating on Layer-1 blockchains. Jay Jog, co-founder of Sei Labs, argued that "Base going down when AWS goes down is literally the entire argument in favour of EVM L1s like Sei." He emphasized that true decentralization is about resilience, something demonstrated by major Layer-1 networks like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, which continued processing transactions despite the AWS disruption.

这次中断还强化了在第一层区块链上构建和运行的论点。 Sei Labs 联合创始人 Jay Jog 认为，“当 AWS 宕机时，Base 也会宕机，这实际上就是支持 Sei 等 EVM L1 的全部论据。”他强调，真正的去中心化在于弹性，比特币、以太坊和 Solana 等主要 Layer-1 网络就证明了这一点，尽管 AWS 中断，但这些网络仍继续处理交易。

These networks' globally distributed validator sets and independent node operators, not tied to a single provider, allowed them to weather the storm. While Layer-2 solutions offer faster throughput and cheaper fees, they often compromise on decentralization, as the AWS outage painfully illustrated.

这些网络的全球分布式验证器集和独立的节点运营商（不依赖于单一提供商）使它们能够渡过难关。虽然第 2 层解决方案提供更快的吞吐量和更便宜的费用，但它们通常会在去中心化方面做出妥协，正如 AWS 中断所痛苦地说明的那样。

Déjà Vu: A Recurring Problem

似曾相识：反复出现的问题

This isn’t the first time AWS has caused chaos in the crypto world. A similar outage in April 2025 prompted the same warnings, yet little seems to have changed. As Jenkins from Pocket Network pointed out, the internet's original vision of millions of interconnected, independent connections has been overshadowed by the dominance of centralized services, exacerbating the problem.

这并不是 AWS 第一次在加密世界造成混乱。 2025 年 4 月发生的类似中断引发了相同的警告，但似乎没有什么变化。正如 Pocket Network 的 Jenkins 指出的那样，互联网最初设想的数百万个相互连接、独立的连接已经被中心化服务的主导地位所掩盖，从而加剧了问题。

The Path Forward: True Decentralization or Centralized Convenience?

前进之路：真正的去中心化还是集中化便利？

The crypto industry faces a critical choice: prioritize true decentralization, even if it means sacrificing some convenience, or continue relying on centralized infrastructure and risk future disruptions. The AWS outage served as a stark reminder that decentralization is more than just a buzzword; it's a necessity for building truly resilient and censorship-resistant systems.

加密行业面临着一个关键的选择：优先考虑真正的去中心化，即使这意味着牺牲一些便利性，或者继续依赖集中式基础设施并冒着未来中断的风险。 AWS 的故障清楚地提醒我们，去中心化不仅仅是一个流行词；这是构建真正有弹性和抗审查系统的必要条件。

Maybe it's time to dust off those old dial-up modems and start running our own nodes (just kidding... mostly). But seriously, the next time you hear someone touting the benefits of a particular blockchain, ask them where it's hosted. The answer might surprise you, and it might just change your perspective on what

也许是时候掸掉那些旧的拨号调制解调器的灰尘并开始运行我们自己的节点了（开个玩笑......主要是）。但说真的，下次当你听到有人吹捧特定区块链的好处时，问问他们它的托管位置。答案可能会让你感到惊讶，并且可能会改变你对什么的看法