龍捲風現金，羅馬風暴和法律支出：加密隱私對決

圍繞龍捲風現金聯合創始人羅馬風暴的法律戰鬥加劇了，強調了加密隱私與監管監督之間的衝突。本文深入了解最新發展。

Tornado Cash, Roman Storm, and Legal Expenses: A Crypto Privacy Showdown

龍捲風現金，羅馬風暴和法律支出：加密隱私對決

The Tornado Cash saga continues, with Roman Storm's legal battle escalating and raising critical questions about crypto privacy, regulation, and the future of DeFi. Let's break down the key developments.

龍捲風現金傳奇仍在繼續，羅馬風暴的法律鬥爭不斷升級，並提出了有關加密隱私，監管和Defi的未來的關鍵問題。讓我們分解關鍵的發展。

Storm's Mounting Legal Bills

Storm的納入法律賬單

Roman Storm, co-creator of Tornado Cash, is facing serious charges related to money laundering, sanctions violations, and operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business. With the trial underway in Manhattan since July 14, 2025, Storm urgently needs an additional $1.5 million to cover his ballooning legal expenses. His defense hinges on the argument that Tornado Cash, as an open-source and decentralized protocol, is beyond the control of any single individual, framing the case as a challenge to constitutional rights and regulatory overreach.

龍捲風現金共同創造者羅馬風暴正面臨與洗錢，違反制裁和經營無牌貨幣傳遞業務有關的嚴重指控。自2025年7月14日以來，隨著曼哈頓的審判，Storm迫切需要額外的150萬美元來支付他激增的法律費用。他的辯護取決於這樣的論點，即龍捲風現金作為開源和分散的協議，無法控制任何個人，這將案件作為對憲法權利和監管過度的挑戰。

So far, Storm’s Legal Defense Fund has raised over $3.9 million, nearing its revised $5 million target, which includes a significant contribution from the Ethereum Foundation. But legal costs are climbing, making the new funding goal crucial to sustain the defense.

到目前為止，Storm的法律辯護基金已籌集了超過390萬美元，接近其修訂後的500萬美元目標，其中包括以太坊基金會的重大貢獻。但是法律成本正在攀升，這使得新的資金目標對於維持辯護至關重要。

The Legal Battleground: Free Speech vs. Regulation

法律戰場：言論自由與法規

The core legal arguments revolve around the boundaries of free speech and regulatory power in the crypto space. Storm’s team points to a 2019 FinCEN guidance suggesting that developers of anonymizing tools don't need to register as money transmitters. They also argue that code publication is protected under the First Amendment, challenging the government’s right to criminalize open-source software. Prosecutors, however, are zeroing in on Tornado Cash’s alleged misuse by illicit actors, including the North Korean-linked Lazarus Group.

核心法律論點圍繞著加密空間中言論自由和監管權的界限。 Storm的團隊指出了2019年的FinCen指南，這表明匿名工具的開發人員無需註冊為貨幣發射機。他們還認為，根據《第一修正案》的保護，代碼出版物受到保護，挑戰了政府將開源軟件定為犯罪的權利。然而，檢察官正在將龍捲風現金（Tornado Cash）誤以為是非法演員的濫用，包括與北朝鮮相關的拉撒路集團（Lazarus Group）。

Implications for the Crypto Ecosystem

對加密生態系統的影響

The trial's outcome could set a precedent with far-reaching consequences for the crypto world. A conviction could deter future privacy-focused DeFi projects. A win for the defense could strengthen the legal standing of decentralized protocols and bolster protections for open-source innovation. The case highlights the friction between regulatory frameworks designed for centralized systems and the decentralized nature of blockchain.

試驗的結果可能會對加密貨幣世界產生深遠的影響。信念可以阻止未來以隱私為重點的Defi項目。辯護的勝利可以加強分散協議的法律地位，並為開源創新提供保護。該案例突出了為集中系統設計的監管框架與區塊鏈分散性質之間的摩擦。

Dragonfly Capital Under Scrutiny

蜻蜓資本受到審查

Adding another layer to the story, Dragonfly Capital, an early investor in Tornado Cash developer PepperSec, Inc., might face federal charges. Dragonfly maintains that it invested in Tornado Cash because it believes in open-source privacy-preserving technology, and that it consulted legal counsel beforehand to ensure compliance.

龍捲風現金開發商Peppersec，Inc。的早期投資者Dragonfly Capital在故事中增加了另一層，可能會面臨聯邦指控。蜻蜓堅持認為，它投資了龍捲風現金，因為它相信開源隱私的技術，並且事先向法律顧問諮詢以確保合規性。

Ethereum Dev Testifies

以太坊開發證明

An Ethereum core developer, Preston Van Loon, testified for the defense, describing Tornado Cash as a “privacy tool for Ethereum.” He even admitted to using the mixing service himself, citing security concerns. This adds a new dimension to the debate, highlighting the potential benefits of privacy tools for legitimate users.

以太坊的核心開發商普雷斯頓·範·洛恩（Preston Van Loon）作證了辯護，將龍捲風現金描述為“以太坊的隱私工具”。他甚至承認自己以安全性問題為由使用混合服務。這為辯論增加了一個新的維度，突出了合法用戶的隱私工具的潛在好處。

Looking Ahead

展望未來

The crypto community remains divided, with some seeing Tornado Cash as essential for financial privacy and others viewing it as a tool for illicit activities. The trial is being closely watched by industry stakeholders, legal experts, and regulators, all anticipating a ruling that could reshape the legal landscape for decentralized technologies.

加密社區仍然分裂，有些人認為Tornado Cash對於財務隱私至關重要，其他人則將其視為非法活動的工具。該審判正在由行業利益相關者，法律專家和監管機構密切關注，所有這些都期望一項裁決可以重塑分散技術的法律景觀。

So, what's the takeaway? This case is a major test of how existing laws apply to new technologies. It’s about privacy, innovation, and the balance between freedom and regulation. Whatever the outcome, it's sure to keep the crypto world buzzing.

那麼，收穫是什麼？這種情況是對現有法律如何適用新技術的主要考驗。這是關於隱私，創新以及自由與監管之間的平衡。無論結果如何，都一定會使加密貨幣世界嗡嗡作響。