龙卷风现金，罗马风暴和法律支出：加密隐私对决

围绕龙卷风现金联合创始人罗马风暴的法律战斗加剧了，强调了加密隐私与监管监督之间的冲突。本文深入了解最新发展。

Tornado Cash, Roman Storm, and Legal Expenses: A Crypto Privacy Showdown

龙卷风现金，罗马风暴和法律支出：加密隐私对决

The Tornado Cash saga continues, with Roman Storm's legal battle escalating and raising critical questions about crypto privacy, regulation, and the future of DeFi. Let's break down the key developments.

龙卷风现金传奇仍在继续，罗马风暴的法律斗争不断升级，并提出了有关加密隐私，监管和Defi的未来的关键问题。让我们分解关键的发展。

Storm's Mounting Legal Bills

Storm的纳入法律账单

Roman Storm, co-creator of Tornado Cash, is facing serious charges related to money laundering, sanctions violations, and operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business. With the trial underway in Manhattan since July 14, 2025, Storm urgently needs an additional $1.5 million to cover his ballooning legal expenses. His defense hinges on the argument that Tornado Cash, as an open-source and decentralized protocol, is beyond the control of any single individual, framing the case as a challenge to constitutional rights and regulatory overreach.

龙卷风现金共同创造者罗马风暴正面临与洗钱，违反制裁和经营无牌货币传递业务有关的严重指控。自2025年7月14日以来，随着曼哈顿的审判，Storm迫切需要额外的150万美元来支付他激增的法律费用。他的辩护取决于这样的论点，即龙卷风现金作为开源和分散的协议，无法控制任何个人，这将案件作为对宪法权利和监管过度的挑战。

So far, Storm’s Legal Defense Fund has raised over $3.9 million, nearing its revised $5 million target, which includes a significant contribution from the Ethereum Foundation. But legal costs are climbing, making the new funding goal crucial to sustain the defense.

到目前为止，Storm的法律辩护基金已筹集了超过390万美元，接近其修订后的500万美元目标，其中包括以太坊基金会的重大贡献。但是法律成本正在攀升，这使得新的资金目标对于维持辩护至关重要。

The Legal Battleground: Free Speech vs. Regulation

法律战场：言论自由与法规

The core legal arguments revolve around the boundaries of free speech and regulatory power in the crypto space. Storm’s team points to a 2019 FinCEN guidance suggesting that developers of anonymizing tools don't need to register as money transmitters. They also argue that code publication is protected under the First Amendment, challenging the government’s right to criminalize open-source software. Prosecutors, however, are zeroing in on Tornado Cash’s alleged misuse by illicit actors, including the North Korean-linked Lazarus Group.

核心法律论点围绕着加密空间中言论自由和监管权的界限。 Storm的团队指出了2019年的FinCen指南，这表明匿名工具的开发人员无需注册为货币发射机。他们还认为，根据《第一修正案》的保护，代码出版物受到保护，挑战了政府将开源软件定为犯罪的权利。然而，检察官正在将龙卷风现金（Tornado Cash）误以为是非法演员的滥用，包括与北朝鲜相关的拉撒路集团（Lazarus Group）。

Implications for the Crypto Ecosystem

对加密生态系统的影响

The trial's outcome could set a precedent with far-reaching consequences for the crypto world. A conviction could deter future privacy-focused DeFi projects. A win for the defense could strengthen the legal standing of decentralized protocols and bolster protections for open-source innovation. The case highlights the friction between regulatory frameworks designed for centralized systems and the decentralized nature of blockchain.

试验的结果可能会对加密货币世界产生深远的影响。信念可以阻止未来以隐私为重点的Defi项目。辩护的胜利可以加强分散协议的法律地位，并为开源创新提供保护。该案例突出了为集中系统设计的监管框架与区块链分散性质之间的摩擦。

Dragonfly Capital Under Scrutiny

蜻蜓资本受到审查

Adding another layer to the story, Dragonfly Capital, an early investor in Tornado Cash developer PepperSec, Inc., might face federal charges. Dragonfly maintains that it invested in Tornado Cash because it believes in open-source privacy-preserving technology, and that it consulted legal counsel beforehand to ensure compliance.

龙卷风现金开发商Peppersec，Inc。的早期投资者Dragonfly Capital在故事中增加了另一层，可能会面临联邦指控。蜻蜓坚持认为，它投资了龙卷风现金，因为它相信开源隐私的技术，并且事先向法律顾问咨询以确保合规性。

Ethereum Dev Testifies

以太坊开发证明

An Ethereum core developer, Preston Van Loon, testified for the defense, describing Tornado Cash as a “privacy tool for Ethereum.” He even admitted to using the mixing service himself, citing security concerns. This adds a new dimension to the debate, highlighting the potential benefits of privacy tools for legitimate users.

以太坊的核心开发商普雷斯顿·范·洛恩（Preston Van Loon）作证了辩护，将龙卷风现金描述为“以太坊的隐私工具”。他甚至承认自己以安全性问题为由使用混合服务。这为辩论增加了一个新的维度，突出了合法用户的隐私工具的潜在好处。

Looking Ahead

展望未来

The crypto community remains divided, with some seeing Tornado Cash as essential for financial privacy and others viewing it as a tool for illicit activities. The trial is being closely watched by industry stakeholders, legal experts, and regulators, all anticipating a ruling that could reshape the legal landscape for decentralized technologies.

加密社区仍然分裂，有些人认为Tornado Cash对于财务隐私至关重要，其他人则将其视为非法活动的工具。该审判正在由行业利益相关者，法律专家和监管机构密切关注，所有这些都期望一项裁决可以重塑分散技术的法律景观。

So, what's the takeaway? This case is a major test of how existing laws apply to new technologies. It’s about privacy, innovation, and the balance between freedom and regulation. Whatever the outcome, it's sure to keep the crypto world buzzing.

那么，收获是什么？这种情况是对现有法律如何适用新技术的主要考验。这是关于隐私，创新以及自由与监管之间的平衡。无论结果如何，都一定会使加密货币世界嗡嗡作响。