Satoshi，Op_Return和永無止境的辯論：有什麼交易？

比特幣社區再次捲入了有關OP_RETURN的激烈辯論中，讓人想起Satoshi本人在2010年引發的討論。

The Bitcoin world is buzzing, and not all the chatter is about price predictions. A familiar ghost has resurfaced: the debate around OP_RETURN and its impact on the network. This all traces back to arguments Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin's enigmatic creator, ignited way back in 2010. Buckle up, because it's a wild ride!

比特幣界正在嗡嗡作響，並不是所有的chat不休都是關於價格預測的。一個熟悉的幽靈重新浮出水面：圍繞OP_Return及其對網絡的影響的辯論。這一切都追溯到比特幣神秘的創作者Satoshi Nakamoto的爭論，在2010年點燃了。

The Core of the Matter: OP_RETURN and Data Storage

問題的核心：op_return和數據存儲

At the heart of this debate is Bitcoin Core v30's upcoming release. It's set to remove the 80-byte cap on OP_RETURN, an opcode that allows users to store arbitrary data (think non-financial info) on the blockchain. This seemingly technical tweak has opened a Pandora's Box of opinions.

這場辯論的核心是比特幣Core V30即將發布的發行版。它的設置旨在刪除OP_Return上的80字節蓋，這是一個允許用戶在區塊鏈上存儲任意數據（思考非財務信息）的OPCODE。這種看似技術性的調整打開了潘多拉的意見。

Some argue this is a slippery slope, opening the floodgates to spam and potentially illegal content. They believe Bitcoin should stick to its primary purpose: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, not a data storage free-for-all. Critics, like Jimmy Song, see it as a "fiat" mentality, deflecting genuine concerns about the long-term impact of bloating the blockchain.

有人認為這是一個濕滑的斜坡，打開垃圾郵件和潛在非法內容的閘門。他們認為比特幣應該堅持其主要目的：點對點電子現金系統，而不是全部數據存儲。批評家像吉米（Jimmy）的歌（Jimmy Song）一樣，將其視為一種“法定”的心態，偏見了對區塊鏈膨脹的長期影響的真正擔憂。

On the other side, proponents argue that expanding OP_RETURN offers a cleaner, safer way to attach extra data to Bitcoin. They envision a future where Bitcoin serves as a foundation for layer-2 networks and other innovative applications. These supporters believe the arbitrary limit is too restrictive.

另一方面，支持者認為，擴展OP_Return提供了一種更清潔，更安全的方法，將額外的數據附加到比特幣上。他們設想了一個未來，比特幣是第2層網絡和其他創新應用的基礎。這些支持者認為，任意限製過於限制。

Déjà Vu: Echoes of the Block Size Wars

déjàvu：塊大小戰爭的迴聲

Sound familiar? This isn't Bitcoin's first rodeo with contentious protocol changes. The OP_RETURN debate has been raging for months, drawing parallels to the infamous block size wars of 2015-2017. That conflict ultimately led to the creation of Bitcoin Cash, and some worry the OP_RETURN fracas could trigger a similar schism.

聽起來很熟悉嗎？這不是比特幣的第一個具有有爭議的協議更改的牛仔競技表演。 OP_Return的辯論已經肆虐了幾個月，與2015 - 2017年臭名昭著的塊大小戰爭相似。這種衝突最終導致了比特幣現金的創造，有些人擔心op_return fracas可能會引發類似的分裂。

Adding fuel to the fire, Bitcoin Knots, an alternative implementation of Bitcoin node software, has seen a surge in popularity. Knots allows node runners to enforce stricter data size limits, a move seen by some as a defense against the perceived bloat.

比特幣結的燃料是比特幣節點軟件的替代實現的比特幣結，人們的流行激增。結允許節點跑步者強制執行更嚴格的數據尺寸限制，這一舉動被某些人視為防禦感知到的膨脹。

The Corporate Angle and the Future of Bitcoin

公司角度和比特幣的未來

Adding another layer of complexity, there are allegations that corporate interests are pressuring developers to expand OP_RETURN limits. The argument is that storing more data on-chain enables the development of Bitcoin-based systems, such as layer-2 networks. However, this raises concerns about centralization and the potential for Bitcoin to be influenced by powerful entities.

增加了另一層複雜性，指控公司利益正在向開發人員施加壓力以擴大OP_Return限制。論點是，在鏈上存儲更多數據可以使基於比特幣的系統（例如第2層網絡）的開發。但是，這引起了人們對集中化的擔憂，以及比特幣受強大實體影響的潛力。

Stacks and the Promise of Programmable Bitcoin

堆棧和可編程比特幣的承諾

Amidst the OP_RETURN drama, projects like Stacks are pushing forward with their vision of a more programmable Bitcoin. Stacks' "Satoshi Upgrades" aim to unlock the potential of Bitcoin by enabling self-custodial sBTC, allowing users to leverage Bitcoin in Web3 applications. This could potentially unlock trillions of dollars currently locked up in Bitcoin.

在OP_Return戲劇中，像Stacks這樣的項目以其可編程比特幣的願景推動了前進。 Stacks的“ Satoshi升級”旨在通過啟用自我定型SBTC來解鎖比特幣的潛力，從而使用戶能夠在Web3應用程序中利用比特幣。這可能會解鎖目前鎖定在比特幣中的數万億美元。

So, What's the Verdict?

那麼，判決是什麼？

The OP_RETURN debate is far from settled. It highlights fundamental disagreements about Bitcoin's purpose and its future. Is it a purely a digital currency, or a platform for innovation? The answer, it seems, depends on who you ask.

OP_Return的辯論遠未解決。它突出了關於比特幣目的及其未來的基本分歧。它是純粹的數字貨幣還是創新平台？答案似乎取決於您問誰。

Regardless of where you stand, one thing is clear: Bitcoin is a constantly evolving technology, shaped by passionate debates and competing visions. And that, my friends, is what makes it so darn interesting.

無論您的立場如何，一件事都是清楚的：比特幣是一種不斷發展的技術，受熱情的辯論和競爭願景的影響。我的朋友們，這使它變得如此有趣。

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go ponder the meaning of it all while simultaneously checking my Bitcoin balance. You know, for research purposes.

現在，如果您能原諒我，我將同時檢查我的比特幣平衡時考慮所有內容的含義。您知道，出於研究目的。