Satoshi，Op_Return和永无止境的辩论：有什么交易？

比特币社区再次卷入了有关OP_RETURN的激烈辩论中，让人想起Satoshi本人在2010年引发的讨论。

The Bitcoin world is buzzing, and not all the chatter is about price predictions. A familiar ghost has resurfaced: the debate around OP_RETURN and its impact on the network. This all traces back to arguments Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin's enigmatic creator, ignited way back in 2010. Buckle up, because it's a wild ride!

比特币界正在嗡嗡作响，并不是所有的chat不休都是关于价格预测的。一个熟悉的幽灵重新浮出水面：围绕OP_Return及其对网络的影响的辩论。这一切都追溯到比特币神秘的创作者Satoshi Nakamoto的争论，在2010年点燃了。

The Core of the Matter: OP_RETURN and Data Storage

问题的核心：op_return和数据存储

At the heart of this debate is Bitcoin Core v30's upcoming release. It's set to remove the 80-byte cap on OP_RETURN, an opcode that allows users to store arbitrary data (think non-financial info) on the blockchain. This seemingly technical tweak has opened a Pandora's Box of opinions.

这场辩论的核心是比特币Core V30即将发布的发行版。它的设置旨在删除OP_Return上的80字节盖，这是一个允许用户在区块链上存储任意数据（思考非财务信息）的OPCODE。这种看似技术性的调整打开了潘多拉的意见。

Some argue this is a slippery slope, opening the floodgates to spam and potentially illegal content. They believe Bitcoin should stick to its primary purpose: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, not a data storage free-for-all. Critics, like Jimmy Song, see it as a "fiat" mentality, deflecting genuine concerns about the long-term impact of bloating the blockchain.

有人认为这是一个湿滑的斜坡，打开垃圾邮件和潜在非法内容的闸门。他们认为比特币应该坚持其主要目的：点对点电子现金系统，而不是全部数据存储。批评家像吉米（Jimmy）的歌（Jimmy Song）一样，将其视为一种“法定”的心态，偏见了对区块链膨胀的长期影响的真正担忧。

On the other side, proponents argue that expanding OP_RETURN offers a cleaner, safer way to attach extra data to Bitcoin. They envision a future where Bitcoin serves as a foundation for layer-2 networks and other innovative applications. These supporters believe the arbitrary limit is too restrictive.

另一方面，支持者认为，扩展OP_Return提供了一种更清洁，更安全的方法，将额外的数据附加到比特币上。他们设想了一个未来，比特币是第2层网络和其他创新应用的基础。这些支持者认为，任意限制过于限制。

Déjà Vu: Echoes of the Block Size Wars

déjàvu：块大小战争的回声

Sound familiar? This isn't Bitcoin's first rodeo with contentious protocol changes. The OP_RETURN debate has been raging for months, drawing parallels to the infamous block size wars of 2015-2017. That conflict ultimately led to the creation of Bitcoin Cash, and some worry the OP_RETURN fracas could trigger a similar schism.

听起来很熟悉吗？这不是比特币的第一个具有有争议的协议更改的牛仔竞技表演。 OP_Return的辩论已经肆虐了几个月，与2015 - 2017年臭名昭著的块大小战争相似。这种冲突最终导致了比特币现金的创造，有些人担心op_return fracas可能会引发类似的分裂。

Adding fuel to the fire, Bitcoin Knots, an alternative implementation of Bitcoin node software, has seen a surge in popularity. Knots allows node runners to enforce stricter data size limits, a move seen by some as a defense against the perceived bloat.

比特币结的燃料是比特币节点软件的替代实现的比特币结，人们的流行激增。结允许节点跑步者强制执行更严格的数据尺寸限制，这一举动被某些人视为防御感知到的膨胀。

The Corporate Angle and the Future of Bitcoin

公司角度和比特币的未来

Adding another layer of complexity, there are allegations that corporate interests are pressuring developers to expand OP_RETURN limits. The argument is that storing more data on-chain enables the development of Bitcoin-based systems, such as layer-2 networks. However, this raises concerns about centralization and the potential for Bitcoin to be influenced by powerful entities.

增加了另一层复杂性，指控公司利益正在向开发人员施加压力以扩大OP_Return限制。论点是，在链上存储更多数据可以使基于比特币的系统（例如第2层网络）的开发。但是，这引起了人们对集中化的担忧，以及比特币受强大实体影响的潜力。

Stacks and the Promise of Programmable Bitcoin

堆栈和可编程比特币的承诺

Amidst the OP_RETURN drama, projects like Stacks are pushing forward with their vision of a more programmable Bitcoin. Stacks' "Satoshi Upgrades" aim to unlock the potential of Bitcoin by enabling self-custodial sBTC, allowing users to leverage Bitcoin in Web3 applications. This could potentially unlock trillions of dollars currently locked up in Bitcoin.

在OP_Return戏剧中，像Stacks这样的项目以其可编程比特币的愿景推动了前进。 Stacks的“ Satoshi升级”旨在通过启用自我定型SBTC来解锁比特币的潜力，从而使用户能够在Web3应用程序中利用比特币。这可能会解锁目前锁定在比特币中的数万亿美元。

So, What's the Verdict?

那么，判决是什么？

The OP_RETURN debate is far from settled. It highlights fundamental disagreements about Bitcoin's purpose and its future. Is it a purely a digital currency, or a platform for innovation? The answer, it seems, depends on who you ask.

OP_Return的辩论远未解决。它突出了关于比特币目的及其未来的基本分歧。它是纯粹的数字货币还是创新平台？答案似乎取决于您问谁。

Regardless of where you stand, one thing is clear: Bitcoin is a constantly evolving technology, shaped by passionate debates and competing visions. And that, my friends, is what makes it so darn interesting.

无论您的立场如何，一件事都是清楚的：比特币是一种不断发展的技术，受热情的辩论和竞争愿景的影响。我的朋友们，这使它变得如此有趣。

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go ponder the meaning of it all while simultaneously checking my Bitcoin balance. You know, for research purposes.

现在，如果您能原谅我，我将同时检查我的比特币平衡时考虑所有内容的含义。您知道，出于研究目的。