邁克爾·塞勒（Michael Saylor），比特幣核心和結：導航OP_Return War

看一下邁克爾·賽勒（Michael Saylor）對比特幣核心與打結辯論的立場，以及對比特幣未來的更廣泛影響。

The Bitcoin community is currently engaged in a fierce debate regarding data storage. This debate pits Bitcoin Core, the most popular software for node operators, against Knots, a fork focused on greater user control. At the heart of this disagreement lies the contentious change to OP_RETURN.

比特幣社區目前正在就數據存儲進行激烈的辯論。這場辯論是比特幣核心（Bitcoin Core），這是節點運算符最受歡迎的軟件，針對打結，該叉子專注於更大的用戶控制。這種分歧的核心是對op_return的爭議變化。

Saylor's Take: A Word Salad or Strategic Ambiguity?

Saylor的看法：一詞沙拉或戰略性歧義？

When asked about the OP_RETURN debate, Michael Saylor, chairman of MicroStrategy, gave a response that was seen as vague. He called the debate a "second-order or maybe even a third-order change." Saylor cautioned against unintended consequences from even well-intentioned upgrades to Bitcoin. While some interpreted his comments as pro-Knots or pro-ossification, others disagreed. Ultimately, his response lacked technical depth, failing to address key aspects like data storage limits and node costs.

當被問及OP_Return辯論時，MicroStrategy主席Michael Saylor給出了一個含糊的回應。他稱辯論為“二階甚至是三階變化”。 Saylor警告說，即使是良好的升級到比特幣，也要產生意想不到的後果。當一些人將他的評論解釋為親節或親義，而另一些人則不同意。最終，他的回應缺乏技術深度，無法解決關鍵方面，例如數據存儲限制和節點成本。

The OP_RETURN War: Core vs. Knots

OP_Return戰爭：核心與結

The core issue revolves around Bitcoin Core's v30 update, which increases the mempool's default datacarrier limit for OP_RETURN from under 90 bytes to roughly 100,000 bytes. Knots, on the other hand, plans to maintain the lower data cap as a deterrent to arbitrary data storage. This has led to what's been called Bitcoin's "OP_RETURN War."

核心問題圍繞比特幣Core的V30更新，這將MEMPOOL的OP_Return的默認DataCarrier限制從90個字節增加到大約100,000個字節。另一方面，打結計劃將較低的數據上限維持，以阻止任意數據存儲。這導致了所謂的比特幣的“ op_return戰爭”。

Knots argues that Core v30 has conceded to corporate data storage interests, which goes against Bitcoin’s core function as a non-fiat financial system. Core v30 proponents claim that spamming is unstoppable, as spammers will continuously find ways to bypass filters.

結認為，Core V30已承認公司數據存儲興趣，這與比特幣作為非法律金融系統的核心功能違背了。核心V30支持者聲稱，垃圾郵件是不可阻擋的，因為垃圾郵件發送者會不斷找到繞過過濾器的方法。

Relay Fee Reduction and Node Dominance

繼電器費用減少和節點優勢

Bitcoin Core 29.1 has also lowered the default minimum relay fee for transactions by 90%. While individual node operators can adjust this, most are expected to stick with the default. Although, Bitcoin Knots 29.1 does not inherit Bitcoin Core’s new defaults. Instead, with this update, Knots decided to “make most policy options configurable in GUI Options, and add ‘corepolicy’ option to use Bitcoin Core defaults.”

比特幣核心29.1還將交易的默認最低繼電器收費降低了90％。雖然單個節點運算符可以調整此操作，但大多數人應堅持默認。雖然，比特幣結29.1不會繼承比特幣核心的新默認值。取而代之的是，通過此更新，結決定“在GUI選項中配置大多數策略選項，並添加'CorePolicy'選項使用比特幣核心默認值。”

Currently, Bitcoin Core dominates the node landscape, but Knots maintains a significant presence. The exact dominance of each version is hotly contested.

目前，比特幣核心佔據了節點景觀，但結保持了重要的存在。每個版本的確切優勢都受到爭議。

Conclusion: A Fork in the Road?

結論：道路上的叉子？

The debate between Bitcoin Core and Knots highlights fundamental disagreements about Bitcoin's direction. Will it embrace arbitrary data storage, or will it prioritize its role as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system? The answer remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the Bitcoin community is passionate and engaged, even if they sometimes act like cats and dogs. Whatever happens, it's sure to be an interesting ride. Buckle up, buttercups!

比特幣核心與結之間的辯論突出了關於比特幣方向的基本分歧。它會包含任意數據存儲，還是優先考慮其作為點對點電子現金系統的角色？答案仍然不確定，但是有一件事很清楚：即使比特幣社區有時像貓和狗一樣，比特幣社區也充滿熱情和參與。無論發生什麼，這肯定是一個有趣的旅程。係好，毛cup！