迈克尔·塞勒（Michael Saylor），比特币核心和结：导航OP_Return War

看一下迈克尔·赛勒（Michael Saylor）对比特币核心与打结辩论的立场，以及对比特币未来的更广泛影响。

The Bitcoin community is currently engaged in a fierce debate regarding data storage. This debate pits Bitcoin Core, the most popular software for node operators, against Knots, a fork focused on greater user control. At the heart of this disagreement lies the contentious change to OP_RETURN.

比特币社区目前正在就数据存储进行激烈的辩论。这场辩论是比特币核心（Bitcoin Core），这是节点运算符最受欢迎的软件，针对打结，该叉子专注于更大的用户控制。这种分歧的核心是对op_return的争议变化。

Saylor's Take: A Word Salad or Strategic Ambiguity?

Saylor的看法：一词沙拉或战略性歧义？

When asked about the OP_RETURN debate, Michael Saylor, chairman of MicroStrategy, gave a response that was seen as vague. He called the debate a "second-order or maybe even a third-order change." Saylor cautioned against unintended consequences from even well-intentioned upgrades to Bitcoin. While some interpreted his comments as pro-Knots or pro-ossification, others disagreed. Ultimately, his response lacked technical depth, failing to address key aspects like data storage limits and node costs.

当被问及OP_Return辩论时，MicroStrategy主席Michael Saylor给出了一个含糊的回应。他称辩论为“二阶甚至是三阶变化”。 Saylor警告说，即使是良好的升级到比特币，也要产生意想不到的后果。当一些人将他的评论解释为亲节或亲义，而另一些人则不同意。最终，他的回应缺乏技术深度，无法解决关键方面，例如数据存储限制和节点成本。

The OP_RETURN War: Core vs. Knots

OP_Return战争：核心与结

The core issue revolves around Bitcoin Core's v30 update, which increases the mempool's default datacarrier limit for OP_RETURN from under 90 bytes to roughly 100,000 bytes. Knots, on the other hand, plans to maintain the lower data cap as a deterrent to arbitrary data storage. This has led to what's been called Bitcoin's "OP_RETURN War."

核心问题围绕比特币Core的V30更新，这将MEMPOOL的OP_Return的默认DataCarrier限制从90个字节增加到大约100,000个字节。另一方面，打结计划将较低的数据上限维持，以阻止任意数据存储。这导致了所谓的比特币的“ op_return战争”。

Knots argues that Core v30 has conceded to corporate data storage interests, which goes against Bitcoin’s core function as a non-fiat financial system. Core v30 proponents claim that spamming is unstoppable, as spammers will continuously find ways to bypass filters.

结认为，Core V30已承认公司数据存储兴趣，这与比特币作为非法律金融系统的核心功能违背了。核心V30支持者声称，垃圾邮件是不可阻挡的，因为垃圾邮件发送者会不断找到绕过过滤器的方法。

Relay Fee Reduction and Node Dominance

继电器费用减少和节点优势

Bitcoin Core 29.1 has also lowered the default minimum relay fee for transactions by 90%. While individual node operators can adjust this, most are expected to stick with the default. Although, Bitcoin Knots 29.1 does not inherit Bitcoin Core’s new defaults. Instead, with this update, Knots decided to “make most policy options configurable in GUI Options, and add ‘corepolicy’ option to use Bitcoin Core defaults.”

比特币核心29.1还将交易的默认最低继电器收费降低了90％。虽然单个节点运算符可以调整此操作，但大多数人应坚持默认。虽然，比特币结29.1不会继承比特币核心的新默认值。取而代之的是，通过此更新，结决定“在GUI选项中配置大多数策略选项，并添加'CorePolicy'选项使用比特币核心默认值。”

Currently, Bitcoin Core dominates the node landscape, but Knots maintains a significant presence. The exact dominance of each version is hotly contested.

目前，比特币核心占据了节点景观，但结保持了重要的存在。每个版本的确切优势都受到争议。

Conclusion: A Fork in the Road?

结论：道路上的叉子？

The debate between Bitcoin Core and Knots highlights fundamental disagreements about Bitcoin's direction. Will it embrace arbitrary data storage, or will it prioritize its role as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system? The answer remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the Bitcoin community is passionate and engaged, even if they sometimes act like cats and dogs. Whatever happens, it's sure to be an interesting ride. Buckle up, buttercups!

比特币核心与结之间的辩论突出了关于比特币方向的基本分歧。它会包含任意数据存储，还是优先考虑其作为点对点电子现金系统的角色？答案仍然不确定，但是有一件事很清楚：即使比特币社区有时像猫和狗一样，比特币社区也充满热情和参与。无论发生什么，这肯定是一个有趣的旅程。系好，毛cup！