第3層網絡：區塊鏈基礎架構中缺少的鏈接？

探索諸如ORB之類的第3層網絡如何成為解決區塊鏈協調和治理挑戰的解決方案，從而統一零散的Web3生態系統。

Layer-3 Networks: The Missing Link in Blockchain Infrastructure?

第3層網絡：區塊鏈基礎架構中缺少的鏈接？

Blockchain's come a long way, right? But even with all its success, especially with Layer-2 solutions, it still feels like something's missing. Enter Layer-3 networks – could they be the key to unlocking blockchain's full potential by addressing coordination and governance gaps?

區塊鏈走了很長一段路，對嗎？但是，即使取得了所有成功，尤其是在第二層解決方案方面，仍然感覺像是缺少的東西。輸入第3層網絡 - 通過解決協調和治理差距，它們是否可以成為解鎖區塊鏈充分潛力的關鍵？

The Layer-2 Landscape: Scaling Up, But Creating New Problems

第2層景觀：擴展，但會產生新的問題

Layer-2 networks like Arbitrum, zkSync, and Cosmos have been total game-changers, tackling the scalability issues that plagued early blockchain iterations. Arbitrum bundles transactions using optimistic rollups, zkSync uses zero-knowledge rollups for enhanced privacy, and Cosmos uses Inter-Blockchain Communication protocol, offering faster speeds and lower fees. But all these separate ecosystems? They've created fragmentation and governance headaches.

第2層網絡等網絡，ZKSYNC和Cosmos等是全面改變遊戲規則的人，可以解決困擾早期區塊鏈迭代的可擴展性問題。使用樂觀的匯總，ZKSYNC使用零知識匯總來增強隱私，Cosmos使用隔離間通信協議，提供更快的速度和較低的費用。但是所有這些獨立的生態系統？他們創造了碎片和治理頭痛。

The Coordination and Governance Gaps

協調和治理差距

Here's the thing: all these Layer-2 solutions are so focused on speed and efficiency that they forgot to play nice with each other. Interoperability is a mess, with complex bridging solutions causing security risks and extra fees. And governance? DAOs sound great in theory, but token-weighted voting often puts all the power in the hands of the

事情就是這樣：所有這些第2層解決方案都集中在速度和效率上，以至於他們忘了彼此玩得很好。互操作性是一團糟，複雜的橋接解決方案導致安全風險和額外的費用。和治理？理論上，道斯聽起來很棒，但是像徵性加權的投票通常將所有權力掌握在手中