市值: $2.9256T 1.33%
成交额(24h): $103.1186B 3.45%
  • 市值: $2.9256T 1.33%
  • 成交额(24h): $103.1186B 3.45%
  • 恐惧与贪婪指数:
  • 市值: $2.9256T 1.33%
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
热门新闻
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
bitcoin
bitcoin

$85882.489292 USD

2.66%

ethereum
ethereum

$2726.255136 USD

1.23%

tether
tether

$0.999653 USD

-0.01%

bnb
bnb

$776.085808 USD

1.09%

xrp
xrp

$1.521475 USD

1.66%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999947 USD

-0.02%

solana
solana

$121.201562 USD

2.45%

tron
tron

$0.334191 USD

-0.95%

zcash
zcash

$1376.191162 USD

-3.52%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$89.815179 USD

0.93%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.095724 USD

0.60%

chainlink
chainlink

$14.345509 USD

0.03%

monero
monero

$548.721371 USD

-0.11%

cardano
cardano

$0.253733 USD

0.94%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$8.970136 USD

1.38%

加密货币新闻

第3层网络:区块链基础架构中缺少的链接?

2025/09/26 19:07

探索诸如ORB之类的第3层网络如何成为解决区块链协调和治理挑战的解决方案,从而统一零散的Web3生态系统。

第3层网络:区块链基础架构中缺少的链接?

Layer-3 Networks: The Missing Link in Blockchain Infrastructure?

第3层网络:区块链基础架构中缺少的链接?

Blockchain's come a long way, right? But even with all its success, especially with Layer-2 solutions, it still feels like something's missing. Enter Layer-3 networks – could they be the key to unlocking blockchain's full potential by addressing coordination and governance gaps?

区块链走了很长一段路,对吗?但是,即使取得了所有成功,尤其是在第二层解决方案方面,仍然感觉像是缺少的东西。输入第3层网络 - 通过解决协调和治理差距,它们是否可以成为解锁区块链充分潜力的关键?

The Layer-2 Landscape: Scaling Up, But Creating New Problems

第2层景观:扩展,但会产生新的问题

Layer-2 networks like Arbitrum, zkSync, and Cosmos have been total game-changers, tackling the scalability issues that plagued early blockchain iterations. Arbitrum bundles transactions using optimistic rollups, zkSync uses zero-knowledge rollups for enhanced privacy, and Cosmos uses Inter-Blockchain Communication protocol, offering faster speeds and lower fees. But all these separate ecosystems? They've created fragmentation and governance headaches.

第2层网络等网络,ZKSYNC和Cosmos等是全面改变游戏规则的人,可以解决困扰早期区块链迭代的可扩展性问题。使用乐观的汇总,ZKSYNC使用零知识汇总来增强隐私,Cosmos使用隔离间通信协议,提供更快的速度和较低的费用。但是所有这些独立的生态系统?他们创造了碎片和治理头痛。

The Coordination and Governance Gaps

协调和治理差距

Here's the thing: all these Layer-2 solutions are so focused on speed and efficiency that they forgot to play nice with each other. Interoperability is a mess, with complex bridging solutions causing security risks and extra fees. And governance? DAOs sound great in theory, but token-weighted voting often puts all the power in the hands of the

事情就是这样:所有这些第2层解决方案都集中在速度和效率上,以至于他们忘了彼此玩得很好。互操作性是一团糟,复杂的桥接解决方案导致安全风险和额外的费用。和治理?理论上,道斯听起来很棒,但是象征性加权的投票通常将所有权力掌握在手中

原文来源:cryptorank

免责声明:info@kdj.com

所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!

如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。

2026年10月02日 发表的其他文章