加密貨幣交易者在USDT中損失了250萬美元來解決中毒騙局 - 一天內兩次

一家加密貨幣交易員在兩小時內陷入了同一騙局後，損失超過250萬美元（USDT）

A crypto trader has suffered an unfortunate loss of over $2.5 million in Tether (USDT) after falling victim to the same scam twice in one day, as reported by blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer.

正如Blockchain Security Firm報導的，一家加密貨幣交易員在兩次造成了同一騙局的受害者兩次，損失超過250萬美元（USDT）。

The trader's tale of woe began at 03:15 (UTC) on May 26, when they made a mistake that would have serious consequences. The trader accidentally transferred 712 ETH, valued at around $843,000, to an address poisoned by scammers.

交易者的禍患故事始於5月26日的03:15（UTC），當時他們犯了一個嚴重後果的錯誤。交易者不小心將712 ETH轉移到了約843,000美元的左右，轉移到了被騙子中毒的地址。

The trader had been intending to send the funds to another recipient, and to avoid any errors, they copied the wallet address from their transaction history on Etherscan. However, what they didn't notice was that the address had been manipulated by scammers.

交易者原本打算將資金匯入另一個收件人，為了避免任何錯誤，他們從Etherscan的交易歷史記錄中復制了錢包地址。但是，他們沒有註意到的是該地址是由騙子操縱的。

Just four hours later, at 07:14 (UTC), the same mistake was repeated, this time with even greater losses. The trader mistakenly sent 1400 ETH, valued at approximately $1.7 million, to a scammer's address again.

僅僅四個小時後，在07:14（UTC），重複了同樣的錯誤，這次損失更大。交易員錯誤地向騙子的地址派出了1400 ETH，價值約170萬美元。

The attack method used in this case is known as address poisoning or history poisoning. Scammers send small transactions from wallet addresses that closely mimic legitimate ones the victim has interacted with. These fake transfers then appear in the user's wallet history, giving the impression they are from trusted addresses.

在這種情況下使用的攻擊方法稱為地址中毒或歷史中毒。騙子從錢包地址發送小型交易，這些交易緊密模仿了受害者與之互動的交易。這些假傳輸然後出現在用戶的錢包歷史記錄中，給人留下了來自可信賴地址的印象。

When users later copy an address from their transaction history to send a new payment, they can easily mistake the scammer's address for a legitimate one — leading to massive, irreversible losses.

當用戶以後將其交易歷史記錄中的地址複製到新付款時，他們可以輕鬆地將騙子的地址誤認為合法的地址 - 導致巨大的，不可逆轉的損失。

This incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of double-checking all wallet addresses, even when dealing with familiar recipients, to avoid falling victim to such scams.

這一事件引起了人們的重視，即使與熟悉的接收者打交道，也要避免陷入此類騙局的受害者。

It also highlights the dangers of relying on wallet history for transactions and the need for users to be extra vigilant when copying addresses to avoid making costly errors.

它還突出了依靠錢包歷史進行交易的危險，以及在復制地址時需要額外警惕以避免造成昂貴的錯誤時需要保持警惕。