SEC v. Coinbase：中間上訴動議的待決裁決

SEC 和 Coinbase 正在等待法院對 Coinbase 中間上訴動議的裁決。 Coinbase 於 2024 年 4 月提交了中間上訴動議，請求允許對 Coinbase 駁回動議 (MTD) 裁決提出上訴。

The SEC and Coinbase are awaiting a courtroom ruling on the Coinbase Movement for Interlocutory Appeal. Coinbase filed the Movement for Interlocutory Appeal in April 2024, requesting permission to attraction towards the Coinbase Movement to Dismiss (MTD) ruling.

SEC 和 Coinbase 正在等待法庭對 Coinbase 中間上訴運動的裁決。 Coinbase 於 2024 年 4 月提交了中間上訴運動，請求允許對 Coinbase 駁回運動 (MTD) 裁決進行上訴。

For context, Coinbase filed the MTD in August 2023, arguing that the SEC lacked the statutory authority to control crypto exchanges.

作為背景，Coinbase 於 2023 年 8 月提交了 MTD，認為 SEC 缺乏控制加密貨幣交易所的法定權力。

Associated articles

相關文章

Decide Katherine Failla denied, largely, the MTD, surmising,

凱瑟琳法伊拉 (Katherine Failla) 很大程度上否認了 MTD，她推測，

“The courtroom concludes that as a result of the well-placed allegations of the Criticism plausibly help the SEC’s declare that Coinbase operated as an unregistered middleman of securities, Defendants’ movement have to be denied largely.”

“法庭得出的結論是，由於對批評的恰當指控似乎有助於美國證券交易委員會宣布 Coinbase 作為未註冊的證券中間人運作，因此被告的行動必須在很大程度上被否認。”

If Decide Failla grants the Coinbase Movement for Interlocutory Appeal, the SEC vs. Coinbase case will pause till the attraction course of concludes. Efficiently overturning the Movement to Dismiss may benefit XRP and the broader crypto market.

如果 Failla 決定批准 Coinbase 中間上訴行動，那麼 SEC v. Coinbase 案件將暫停，直到上訴程序結束。有效推翻解散運動可能有利於 XRP 和更廣泛的加密市場。

This newest improvement within the SEC vs. Coinbase case might have implications for the XRP lawsuit, particularly contemplating the latest rulings in different SEC vs. crypto instances.

SEC v. Coinbase 案件中的這項最新進展可能會對 XRP 訴訟產生影響，特別是考慮到 SEC 訴加密案件中不同案件的最新裁決。

In June 2024, Decide Amy Berman Jackson dismissed the SEC claims towards Binance that secondary gross sales of Binance Coin (BNB) tokens certified as securities underneath the Howey take a look at.

2024 年 6 月，艾米·伯曼·傑克遜 (Amy Berman Jackson) 駁回了 SEC 對幣安的指控，即在 Howey 審查下認證為證券的幣安幣 (BNB) 代幣的二次銷售。

Crucial takeaways from the SEC vs. Binance ruling embody Decide Jackson’s evaluation of the Howey take a look at and the classification of BNB tokens as digital foreign money.

美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 與幣安 (Binance) 裁決的重要內容包括 Decide Jackson 對 Howey 審查的評估以及 BNB 代幣作為數位貨幣的分類。

Decide Jackson referenced the earlier Programmatic Gross sales of XRP ruling, highlighting the courtroom’s strategy in figuring out whether or not XRP gross sales concerned an funding contract.

Decide Jackson 引用了先前 XRP 程序化銷售總額的裁決，強調了法庭在確定 XRP 銷售總額是否涉及融資合約時的策略。

Moreover, Decide Jackson and Decide Torres disagreed with Decide Jed Rakoff on the matter of crypto classifications. Decide Rakoff had beforehand dominated that Terraform Labs and founder Do Kwon violated US securities legal guidelines.

此外，Decide Jackson 和 Decide Torres 在加密貨幣分類問題上與 Decide Jed Rakoff 存在分歧。在此之前，Rakoff 裁定 Terraform Labs 及其創辦人 Do Kwon 違反了美國證券法律準則。

On this regard, various courtroom rulings proceed to deal with the difficulty of crypto classifications as commodities or securities, leading to a crypto market riddled with uncertainty within the absence of a crypto framework.

在這方面，各種法庭裁決繼續處理將加密貨幣分類為商品或證券的困難，導致在缺乏加密貨幣框架的情況下，加密貨幣市場充滿了不確定性。

One other courtroom ruling in favor of the crypto business might contribute to establishing clearer authorized definitions in a US regulatory panorama that desperately wants a crypto framework.

另一項有利於加密業務的法庭裁決可能有助於在迫切需要加密框架的美國監管環境中建立更清晰的授權定義。

Keep knowledgeable with our newest updates and insights to navigate the crypto market. XRP Worth Motion

隨時了解我們的最新更新和見解，以駕馭加密貨幣市場。 XRP 值得動議