自2013年初以來資產的價格上漲超過60萬％，比特幣霍德勒人是否有收穫？

也許 - 如果政府不斷喚醒比特幣的價值，那麼整個“您只在出售時只繳稅”的咒語很快就會成為過去。

The price of Bitcoin (BTC) has risen massively since the beginning of 2013, and it could spell bad news for the coin’s hodlers.

自2013年初以來，比特幣（BTC）的價格大幅上漲，這對於硬幣的霍德爾（Hodlers）來說可能是個壞消息。

As governments are waking up to the cryptocurrency’s value, the whole “you only pay tax when you sell” mantra could soon be a thing of the past.

隨著政府喚醒加密貨幣的價值，整個“您只在出售時只繳稅”的咒語很快就會成為過去。

What if a wealth tax is the answer for revenue-hungry tax agencies with no time to lose? It’s a yearly tax on a person’s total net worth — cash, investments, property and other assets — minus any debts, applied whether or not those assets are sold or generating income. The idea is to boost public revenue and curb inequality, mainly by taxing the ultra-rich. A wealth tax takes a clip off what you own, not what you earn.

如果沒有時間損失的財富稅是渴望收入的稅務機構的答案，該怎麼辦？這是對一個人的總淨資產的年度稅 - 現金，投資，財產和其他資產 - 減去所有債務，無論這些資產是否出售或產生收入。這個想法是為了提高公共收入和遏制不平等，主要是通過對超富豪徵稅。財富稅將您擁有的東西取消，而不是您所賺的。

Countries such as Belgium, Norway and Switzerland have had wealth taxes baked into their tax systems for ages, yet some of the world’s biggest economies — like the US, Australia and France — have largely steered clear.

比利時，挪威和瑞士等國家已經納入了年齡段的稅收系統中的財富稅，但是一些世界上一些最大的經濟體（例如美國，澳大利亞和法國）在很大程度上卻明確了。

That might be changing. More governments are eyeing wealth taxes for crypto. In December 2024, French Senator Sylvie Vermeillet took it a step further, suggesting Bitcoin be labeled “unproductive,” which would mean taxing its gains every year — whether or not it’s ever sold.

這可能正在改變。越來越多的政府正在關注加密貨幣的財富稅。 2024年12月，法國參議員西爾維·維爾梅勒特（Sylvie Vermeillet）進一步邁出了一步，建議比特幣被標記為“非生產性”，這意味著每年都要徵稅，無論它是否曾經出售過。

Yep, every asset holder’s favorite word is unrealized capital gains tax. It would be naive to assume other countries are not thinking about the same idea.

是的，每個資產持有人最喜歡的詞都是未實現的資本利得稅。假設其他國家沒有考慮相同的想法是天真的。

With Bitcoin’s significant gains and industry executives such as ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood eyeing a $1.5-million price tag by 2030, I’d bet a magic 8-ball would say, “Signs point to yes.”

隨著比特幣的巨大收益和行業高管，例如ARK Invest的Cathie Wood，到2030年的價格為150萬美元，我敢打賭，魔術8球會說：“標誌指向是。”

The growing global interest in wealth tax

全球對財富稅的興趣日益增長

It might seem far-fetched, but it is hard to ignore the gains. The average long-term Bitcoin holder is already sitting on significant profits.

這似乎很牽強，但是很難忽略收益。長期的長期比特幣持有人已經佔據了可觀的利潤。

The incentive is obvious. Switzerland’s wealth tax goes up to 1% of a portfolio’s value, and governments know there is plenty to collect.

激勵是顯而易見的。瑞士的財富稅高達投資組合價值的1％，政府知道可以收取很多東西。

Countries catch on — sooner or later. Consider how capital gains tax became the norm.

國家遲早要趕上。考慮如何成為規範資本利得稅。

The US introduced capital gains tax in 1913, the UK jumped on board 52 years later in 1965, and Australia followed in 1985.

美國於1913年提出了資本利得稅，英國在1965年後52年後加入董事會，澳大利亞於1985年隨之而來。

Governments likely considering the wealth tax

政府可能正在考慮財富稅

Governments are likely entertaining the idea — whether they admit it or not. If any country seriously considers it, Germany could be a prime candidate, even though it scrapped its wealth tax back in 1997.

政府可能正在娛樂這個想法 - 無論他們是否承認。如果任何國家都認真考慮了這一點，即使德國在1997年取消了財富稅，德國也可能是主要候選人。

Recently: Ukraine proposes 23% tax on some crypto income, grants exemptions for stablecoins

最近：烏克蘭對某些加密收入提出23％的稅，贈款豁免

In July 2024, offloading 50,000 seized BTC at $58,000 might have seemed like a smart move for the German government, but when Bitcoin hit $100,000 just months later in December, it became clear they left a fortune on the table.

2024年7月，以58,000美元的價格卸載50,000美元的BTC似乎對德國政府來說似乎是一個明智的舉動，但是當比特幣在12月後僅數月後的100,000美元售價100,000美元時，很明顯，他們在桌子上留下了一筆財富。

In retrospect, a costly mistake…

回想起來，這是一個昂貴的錯誤…

Will this be remembered as a blunder on par with Gordon Brown selling half of the UK’s gold reserves at $275 an ounce?

這是否會被記住是與戈登·布朗（Gordon Brown）以每盎司275美元的價格出售英國黃金儲備的一半的錯誤？

Imposing such a rule on the wealthy comes with obvious risks.

將這樣的規則強加給富人帶來明顯的風險。

To understand the real effect of taxation on a country, just follow the money — specifically, where millionaires are moving. Recent data shows that high-net-worth individuals are leaving countries like the United Kingdom en masse, heading for tax-friendly havens like Dubai.

要了解稅收對一個國家的真正影響，只需遵循這筆錢，特別是在百萬富翁正在移動的地方。最近的數據表明，高淨值個人正在離開像英國之類的國家，前往像迪拜這樣的稅收友好的避風港。

The potential repercussions of a wealth tax

財富稅的潛在影響

Will nations risk losing these individuals to tap into unrealized gains on Bitcoin and other assets?

各國是否會冒失去這些人來利用比特幣和其他資產的未實現收益的風險？

Bitcoin is volatile and full of unknowns. While some events could lead to massive losses, governments may still push forward with policies that ultimately drive away millionaires, only to realize the trade-off wasn’t worth it.

比特幣是揮發性的，充滿了未知數。儘管某些事件可能會導致巨大的損失，但政府仍可能會推動最終驅逐百萬富翁的政策，而只是意識到權衡不值得。

Conversely, US President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order establishing a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve — a clear nod to the hodl mentality. No doubt, this has other nations considering a similar move.

相反，美國總統唐納德·特朗普（Donald Trump）最近簽署了一項行政命令，建立了比特幣戰略儲備，這對霍德（Hodl）的心態感到明顯點頭。毫無疑問，這有其他國家正在考慮類似的舉動。

If nations are embracing the hodl mindset, could that mean wealth taxes are off the table in those countries? Only time will tell.

如果各國擁抱霍德爾的思維方式，那是否意味著財富稅在那些國家中不在桌子上？只有時間會證明。

One thing is sure: Bitcoin hodlers have amassed enough wealth to put themselves on the radar of tax authorities. Whether this sparks fundamental policy changes or just political grandstanding, the crypto community won’t sit back quietly.

可以肯定的是：比特幣霍德爾（Bitcoin Hodlers）積累了足夠的財富，可以將自己置於稅務機關的範圍內。無論這引發基本政策變化還是政治上的宏偉壯觀，加密貨幣社區都不會安靜地坐下。

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

本文是出於一般信息目的，不打算被視為法律或投資建議。這裡表達的觀點，思想和觀點是作者獨自一人，不一定反映或代表Cointelegraph的觀點和觀點。