![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Coinbase Execonor Grogan在$ 8B的休眠比特幣突然移動後提出了黑客擔憂。這是一項測試交易錯誤還是更險惡的事情?
Hold onto your hats, crypto enthusiasts! The usually calm waters of the Bitcoin world were recently rocked by the sudden awakening of some seriously old whale wallets. We're talking about wallets dormant for over 14 years suddenly springing to life and moving a staggering $8 billion in BTC. And a Coinbase executive is suggesting it might be a hack.
抓住您的帽子,加密愛好者!最近,比特幣世界的平靜水域因突然覺醒一些嚴重的鯨魚錢包而震撼。我們談論的是,在14年以上休眠的錢包突然興起了生命,並在BTC中轉移了驚人的80億美元。一位共同的執行官暗示這可能是一個黑客。
The Curious Case of the Sleeping Whales
睡鯨的好奇案例
Last week, eagle-eyed observers noticed a flurry of activity from Bitcoin wallets that had been untouched since 2011. These weren't small fry; these were whale wallets, collectively holding a king's ransom in Bitcoin. The question on everyone's mind: Why now?
上週,鷹眼的觀察者註意到自2011年以來一直沒有受到影響的比特幣錢包活動。這些是鯨魚錢包,共同拿著國王的贖金。每個人都想到的問題:為什麼現在?
Coinbase Exec Points to a Potential Hack
Coinbase Exec指向潛在的黑客
Enter Conor Grogan, a director at Coinbase. Grogan, known for his on-chain analysis, took to X (formerly Twitter) with some intriguing observations. He highlighted that one of the wallets appeared to have made a test transaction on the Bitcoin Cash (BCH) network just hours before the massive BTC transfer. Could this be a hacker testing the waters, trying to go unnoticed?
輸入Coinbase董事Conor Grogan。格羅根(Grogan)以其鏈分析而聞名,他以一些有趣的觀察到了X(以前是Twitter)。他強調說,其中一個錢包似乎在大規模BTC轉移之前數小時就對比特幣現金(BCH)網絡進行了測試交易。這可能是試圖忽略的水域測試水域的黑客測試嗎?
Grogan's theory is that the BCH test transfer might have been a way for a hacker to verify access to the wallet before moving the much larger Bitcoin stash. Bitcoin Cash, a hard fork of Bitcoin, shares the same private keys for wallets that held BTC before the fork. A small BCH transaction wouldn't raise as many alarms as a large BTC transfer, making it a potentially stealthy way to check if the keys still worked.
Grogan的理論是,BCH測試轉移可能是黑客在移動更大的比特幣藏匿處驗證對錢包的訪問的一種方式。比特幣現金是一個硬幣的比特幣,分享了與叉子前BTC的錢包相同的私鑰。小型BCH交易不會引起大量BTC轉移的警報,這使其成為檢查鑰匙是否仍然有效的潛在隱身方式。
Adding to the mystery, other BCH wallets tied to the same original Bitcoin stash remained untouched. Why wouldn't a legitimate owner sweep those as well? This discrepancy is a key piece of evidence fueling the hack speculation.
除了謎團外,其他BCH錢包綁在同一原始比特幣藏匿處仍然沒有受到影響。為什麼合法的所有者也不會也不會掃掃描?這種差異是促進黑客猜測的關鍵證據。
Is It Really a Hack? Or Just a Reorg?
真的是黑客嗎?還是只是reorg?
Of course, it's important to remember that this is all speculation. It's entirely possible that the owner is simply reorganizing their holdings after all these years. However, the unusual BCH transaction and the untouched BCH wallets definitely raise eyebrows.
當然,重要的是要記住這都是猜測。這些年來,所有者很可能只是在重組他們的股份。但是,不尋常的BCH交易和未觸及的BCH錢包肯定會引起人們的注意。
Blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence confirmed the coins originated from the same source, sat dormant for over 14 years, and were moved into eight new wallets. The final destination of these funds remains unknown, adding another layer of intrigue to the situation.
區塊鏈分析公司阿卡姆情報公司(Arkham Intelligence)證實了該硬幣起源於同一來源,SAT休眠了14年,並被轉移到八個新錢包中。這些資金的最終目的地仍然未知,在情況中增加了另一層的陰謀。
My Two Satoshis: A Likely Scenario
我的兩個satoshis:可能的情況
While the official story is still developing, here's my take: Grogan's theory of a test transaction gone unnoticed rings true. Why? Because hackers are opportunists, and the Bitcoin Cash fork presented the perfect opportunity. It’s a lower-stakes environment to test access without triggering major alarms. The fact that other BCH wallets weren't touched strengthens the case, suggesting the hacker was laser-focused on the Bitcoin prize.
雖然官方故事仍在發展,但這是我的看法:格羅根(Grogan)的測試交易理論未被注意到戒指。為什麼?因為黑客是機會主義者,而比特幣現金叉是一個絕佳的機會。這是一個較低的賭注環境,可以在不觸發主要警報的情況下測試訪問。其他BCH錢包沒有被觸摸的事實加強了案件,這表明黑客是針對比特幣獎的激光。
Additionally, the wallets in question accumulated Bitcoin when it was trading at $0.78. Imagine sitting on that kind of profit for over a decade. The temptation to finally cash out, or perhaps move the funds to a more secure location, would be immense. However, doing so after such a long period of inactivity would be suspicious, making a stealthy approach all the more appealing to a malicious actor.
此外,所討論的錢包以0.78美元的價格累積了比特幣。想像一下,十多年來坐著這種利潤。最終兌現或將資金移至更安全的位置的誘惑將是巨大的。但是,經過這麼長時間的不活動,這樣做會令人懷疑,這使其對惡意演員更具吸引力。
The Bottom Line
底線
Whether it's a hack or just a whale waking up from a long nap, the sudden movement of $8 billion in Bitcoin is a reminder of the importance of securing your crypto. Keep your private keys safe, folks, because in the wild west of crypto, even the oldest treasures are vulnerable. And remember, if you find yourself with $8 billion in Bitcoin, maybe don't let it gather dust for 14 years, eh?
無論是黑客攻擊還是從長時間的午睡中醒來的鯨魚,突然的80億美元的比特幣動作都提醒人們確保您的加密貨幣的重要性。伙計們,請確保您的私鑰安全,因為在加密貨幣的野外,即使是最古老的寶藏也很脆弱。還記得,如果您發現自己擁有80億美元的比特幣,也許不要讓它收集14年的灰塵,是嗎?
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
-
- 比特幣礦工,人工智能戰爭和美國學習曲線:紐約的心態
- 2025-07-08 00:30:13
- 瀏覽比特幣採礦,AI繁榮和美國不斷發展的監管景觀的交匯處。我們在AI戰爭中加快步伐嗎?
-
-
-
- 佐治亞州:
- 2025-07-07 23:50:57
- Bybit通過完全許可的平台擴展到佐治亞州,提供本地功能和發射活動,這標誌著其全球擴張的重要一步。
-
- 以太坊(ETH)分析師的觀點:即將發生的重大突破嗎?
- 2025-07-07 23:55:12
- 分析人士指出,以太坊的突破潛力,在鯨魚活動,減少交換儲備和強大的技術指標的推動下。 ETH準備激增嗎?
-
- BBVA的加密飛躍:群眾的比特幣和以太坊?
- 2025-07-07 22:30:12
- BBVA更深入地進入加密貨幣,為零售客戶提供比特幣和以太坊。這是改變遊戲規則的人還是只是另一家銀行在潮流上跳來跳去?
-
- 比特幣,策略和意外收穫:解碼最新動作
- 2025-07-07 22:30:12
- 策略的比特幣暫停火花辯論。 $ 14B的收益引發了有關未來舉動的疑問。它是計算出的策略還是市場重新校準的跡象?
-
- 在歷史低點的比特幣Mempool:地平線上的麻煩?
- 2025-07-07 21:10:12
- 比特幣的Mempool異常空虛,這表明儘管價格很高,但仍有潛在的危機。這是網絡的臨時休息還是更深層問題的跡象?