比特幣SV和英國的裁決：拒絕的119億美元賠償要求

在英國，法官已經裁定了有關比特幣SV及其在2019年將Binance等主要加密交易的案件裁定。

A British court has ruled against a claim for 11.9 billion dollars in speculative damages from investors following the 2019 delisting of Bitcoin SV on major crypto-exchanges, including Binance.

在2019年將比特幣SV推薦在包括Binance在內的主要加密貨幣上，英國法院裁定投資者對投資者的投機損失為119億美元。

The investors, classified as “subclass B,” will not be entitled to the compensation.

歸類為“子類B”的投資者將無權獲得賠償。

The case arose from the actions of crypto-exchanges like Binance, Kraken, and ShapeShift in 2019 when they delisted Bitcoin SV following a decision by the founders of Bitcoin Cash to maintain the original chain after a contentious fork.

該案源於2019年Binance，Kraken和Shapeshift等加密交易的行動，當時他們在比特幣現金創始人的決定後將比特幣SV劃過，以在有爭議的叉子之後維護原始鏈。

This led to a group of investors filing a claim for damages, ultimately reaching the British court.

這導致一群投資者提出賠償索賠，最終到達英國法院。

The judgment, written by Master of the Rolls Sir Geoffrey Vos, classified the investors into subclasses.

由勞斯萊斯爵士杰弗裡·沃斯爵士（Sir Geoffrey Vos）撰寫的判決將投資者歸為子類。

Those belonging to “subclass B” had continued to hold BSV even after the delisting and claimed today’s 11.9 billion dollars in damages as the delisting had deprived them of profiting from the “potential rise of BSV to a first-tier cryptocurrency,” like Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.

屬於“子類B”的人，即使在脫穎而出之後，隨著當今的119億美元的損害賠償仍在繼續持有BSV，因為脫穎而出的人剝奪了他們從“ BSV的潛在興起到一線加密貨幣的潛在興起”，例如比特幣和比特幣現金。

However, the jury rejected this theory of growth as “speculative.”

但是，陪審團拒絕了這種增長理論“投機性”。

“The claim for damages is dismissed,” the ruling stated.

該裁決說：“駁回了賠償要求。”

The court highlighted that the investors had a duty to mitigate their losses by selling BSV or exchanging it with other crypto.

法院強調，投資者有責任通過出售BSV或與其他加密貨幣交換來減輕損失。

“They had the duty to mitigate the losses. They cannot recover the losses that they could have reasonably mitigated. [..] Any damages must reflect the market value immediately after the delisting, not hypothetical future highs.”

“他們有責任減輕損失。他們無法恢復本可以合理減輕的損失。[..]任何損害賠償都必須在脫穎而出後立即反映出市場價值，而不是假設的未來高點。”

The ruling elaborates on the types of damages that various investor subclasses can claim.

該裁決詳細闡述了各種投資者子類可以主張的損害類型。

Unlike BSV investors of subclass B, those of “sottoclasse A” and “sottoclasse C” can still claim damages from crypto-exchanges.

與BSV子類B的BSV投資者不同，“ Sottoclasse A”和“ Sottoclasse C”的投資者仍然可以要求加密交易所損害。

Investors of the “subclass A” who sold Bitcoin SV immediately after the delisting can still claim compensation for the immediate drop of 16 pounds per coin, as identified by the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

競爭上訴法庭確定的“亞級A”的投資者在脫落後立即出售了比特幣SV，但仍可以要求每枚硬幣立即減少16磅。

Even users of the “subclass C” who have lost access to their Bitcoin SV coins on exchanges like Kraken or Binance can proceed, but any compensation will be limited to the value of their holdings plus demonstrable consequential losses.

即使是在Kraken或Binance之類的交易所中失去對其比特幣SV硬幣訪問權限的“子類C”的用戶也可以進行，但是任何薪酬都將僅限於其持股的價值以及可證明的結果損失。

In practice, the Court has rejected, in any form, the argument regarding the “loss of benefits from future price increases”. All investors are called to prove, in a concrete and non-hypothetical way, their losses.

實際上，法院以任何形式駁回了關於“未來價格上漲損失的損失”的論點。所有投資者都被要求以具體和非構思方式證明他們的損失。

At the same time, with this verdict, Binance achieved a partial victory, which eliminates the 11.9 billion dollars in compensation requested.

同時，根據這一判決，畢業斯斯取得了部分勝利，從而消除了要求的119億美元的薪酬。

Now, however, both Binance and other crypto-exchanges like Kraken and ShapeShift still have to deal with the remaining compensation claims.

但是，現在，像Kraken和Shapeshift這樣的二金和其他加密交易，仍然必須處理剩餘的薪酬索賠。