比特币SV和英国的裁决：拒绝的119亿美元赔偿要求

在英国，法官已经裁定了有关比特币SV及其在2019年将Binance等主要加密交易的案件裁定。

A British court has ruled against a claim for 11.9 billion dollars in speculative damages from investors following the 2019 delisting of Bitcoin SV on major crypto-exchanges, including Binance.

在2019年将比特币SV推荐在包括Binance在内的主要加密货币上，英国法院裁定投资者对投资者的投机损失为119亿美元。

The investors, classified as “subclass B,” will not be entitled to the compensation.

归类为“子类B”的投资者将无权获得赔偿。

The case arose from the actions of crypto-exchanges like Binance, Kraken, and ShapeShift in 2019 when they delisted Bitcoin SV following a decision by the founders of Bitcoin Cash to maintain the original chain after a contentious fork.

该案源于2019年Binance，Kraken和Shapeshift等加密交易的行动，当时他们在比特币现金创始人的决定后将比特币SV划过，以在有争议的叉子之后维护原始链。

This led to a group of investors filing a claim for damages, ultimately reaching the British court.

这导致一群投资者提出赔偿索赔，最终到达英国法院。

The judgment, written by Master of the Rolls Sir Geoffrey Vos, classified the investors into subclasses.

由劳斯莱斯爵士杰弗里·沃斯爵士（Sir Geoffrey Vos）撰写的判决将投资者归为子类。

Those belonging to “subclass B” had continued to hold BSV even after the delisting and claimed today’s 11.9 billion dollars in damages as the delisting had deprived them of profiting from the “potential rise of BSV to a first-tier cryptocurrency,” like Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.

属于“子类B”的人，即使在脱颖而出之后，随着当今的119亿美元的损害赔偿仍在继续持有BSV，因为脱颖而出的人剥夺了他们从“ BSV的潜在兴起到一线加密货币的潜在兴起”，例如比特币和比特币现金。

However, the jury rejected this theory of growth as “speculative.”

但是，陪审团拒绝了这种增长理论“投机性”。

“The claim for damages is dismissed,” the ruling stated.

该裁决说：“驳回了赔偿要求。”

The court highlighted that the investors had a duty to mitigate their losses by selling BSV or exchanging it with other crypto.

法院强调，投资者有责任通过出售BSV或与其他加密货币交换来减轻损失。

“They had the duty to mitigate the losses. They cannot recover the losses that they could have reasonably mitigated. [..] Any damages must reflect the market value immediately after the delisting, not hypothetical future highs.”

“他们有责任减轻损失。他们无法恢复本可以合理减轻的损失。[..]任何损害赔偿都必须在脱颖而出后立即反映出市场价值，而不是假设的未来高点。”

The ruling elaborates on the types of damages that various investor subclasses can claim.

该裁决详细阐述了各种投资者子类可以主张的损害类型。

Unlike BSV investors of subclass B, those of “sottoclasse A” and “sottoclasse C” can still claim damages from crypto-exchanges.

与BSV子类B的BSV投资者不同，“ Sottoclasse A”和“ Sottoclasse C”的投资者仍然可以要求加密交易所损害。

Investors of the “subclass A” who sold Bitcoin SV immediately after the delisting can still claim compensation for the immediate drop of 16 pounds per coin, as identified by the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

竞争上诉法庭确定的“亚级A”的投资者在脱落后立即出售了比特币SV，但仍可以要求每枚硬币立即减少16磅。

Even users of the “subclass C” who have lost access to their Bitcoin SV coins on exchanges like Kraken or Binance can proceed, but any compensation will be limited to the value of their holdings plus demonstrable consequential losses.

即使是在Kraken或Binance之类的交易所中失去对其比特币SV硬币访问权限的“子类C”的用户也可以进行，但是任何薪酬都将仅限于其持股的价值以及可证明的结果损失。

In practice, the Court has rejected, in any form, the argument regarding the “loss of benefits from future price increases”. All investors are called to prove, in a concrete and non-hypothetical way, their losses.

实际上，法院以任何形式驳回了关于“未来价格上涨损失的损失”的论点。所有投资者都被要求以具体和非构思方式证明他们的损失。

At the same time, with this verdict, Binance achieved a partial victory, which eliminates the 11.9 billion dollars in compensation requested.

同时，根据这一判决，毕业斯斯取得了部分胜利，从而消除了要求的119亿美元的薪酬。

Now, however, both Binance and other crypto-exchanges like Kraken and ShapeShift still have to deal with the remaining compensation claims.

但是，现在，像Kraken和Shapeshift这样的二金和其他加密交易，仍然必须处理剩余的薪酬索赔。