比特幣SV索賠受法院裁決的限制

英國上訴法院已部分駁回了針對Binance和其他交易所的133億美元訴訟。該案件涉及反競爭行為的指控

The UK Court of Appeal has partially dismissed a $13.3 billion lawsuit against Binance and other exchanges over the 2019 delisting of Bitcoin SV (BSV).

英國上訴法院已部分駁回了針對Binance的133億美元訴訟，並在2019年將比特幣SV（BSV）推薦方面進行了交流。

The case arose when BSV holders sued Binance, Kraken, ShapeShift, and Bittylicious for allegedly anti-competitive conduct that drove down the token’s price.

當BSV持有人起訴Binance，Kraken，ShapeShift和Bittylicious涉嫌反競爭性行為時，該案發生了。

The plaintiffs argued that Binance’s decision to delist BSV limited the coin’s chance to grow like Bitcoin (BTC) or Bitcoin Cash (BCH), claiming $13.3 billion in damages—352 times the value of BSV held at the time.

原告辯稱，Binance決定BSV的決定限制了硬幣像比特幣（BTC）或比特幣現金（BCH）一樣成長的機會，要求賠償133億美元，這是當時持有的BSV價值的352倍。

However, the court found this claim unsustainable, noting that BSV had viable substitutes and lacked uniqueness in the market. It ruled that holders cannot base losses on the hypothetical growth of unrelated tokens.

但是，法院認為這一說法不可持續，並指出BSV具有可行的替代品，並且在市場上缺乏獨特性。它裁定，持有人不能基於無關代幣的假設增長的損失。

Moreover, the court applied the market mitigation rule to dismiss claims based on future price speculation after the delisting became public. It emphasized that crypto tokens are volatile and similar to shares and other tradable financial assets.

此外，法院將市場緩解規則應用於脫穎而出的公開後基於未來價格投機的索賠。它強調，加密代幣是波動的，類似於股票和其他可交易金融資產。

The ruling confirms that damages must reflect actual loss, not missed opportunities from possible market movement, as the court prioritized a realistic assessment of financial harm.

該裁決證實，損害賠償必須反映出實際損失，而不是可能因市場轉移而錯過的機會，因為法院優先考慮對財務危害的現實評估。

The court’s decision has limited Binance’s legal risk and significantly reduced the potential payout.

法院的裁決限制了Binance的法律風險，並大大降低了潛在的支出。

Binance, Kraken, ShapeShift, and Bittylicious were accused of delisting BSV to damage its value and prevent it from reaching the same levels as BTC or BCH.

Binance，Kraken，ShapeShift和Bittylicious被指控將BSV推遲以損害其價值，並防止其達到與BTC或BCH相同的水平。

The ruling has narrowed the case’s scope, with only limited access and sale timing claims remaining viable.

該裁決範圍縮小了案件的範圍，只有有限的訪問和銷售時間索賠仍然可行。

Those who could not access or sell BSV immediately after the delisting may still have a case, but the court ruled that losses must be concrete and measurable.

那些在降價後無法立即訪問或出售BSV的人仍可能有案件，但法院裁定損失必須具體且可衡量。

After the delisting, some users had difficulty accessing their BSV on Binance, while others sold quickly and recorded immediate, quantifiable losses. These claims could proceed.

在脫穎而出之後，一些用戶很難訪問其BSV，而另一些用戶則很快出售並記錄了立即可量化的損失。這些主張可以進行。

However, the court struck down the main claim, which sought to hold Binance liable for the difference between BSV’s price at the time of delisting and the potential highs it could have reached if listed.

但是，法院駁回了主要主張，該主張試圖對BSV價格在推翻時的價格和如果列出時可能達到的潛在高點之間的差額承擔責任。

Binance argued that the claimants retained ownership of BSV and could act freely after the delisting event. The court agreed, stating that knowledge of the delisting removed any responsibility from Binance.

Binance辯稱，索賠人保留了BSV的所有權，並且可以在提取事件後自由行動。法院同意，並指出，對非凡的知識取消了Binance的任何責任。

This finding significantly undermined the larger claim for damages, which aimed to compensate users for the potential gains they missed out on due to Binance’s actions.

這一發現極大地破壞了對損害賠償的較大索賠，該賠償旨在補償用戶由於唯一的行動而錯過的潛在收益。

Despite dismissing the main claim, the British judges allowed smaller claims against Binance to continue.

儘管駁回了主要主張，但英國法官允許對Binance的較小主張繼續進行。

These include cases where users could not access their BSV following the delisting action, or sold quickly and recorded immediate, quantifiable losses.

這些案例包括用戶無法在採取挑剔行動之後無法訪問其BSV，或迅速出售並記錄立即可量化的損失。

These claims could proceed under a revised legal framework, with a much lower total exposure.

這些索賠可以根據修訂後的法律框架進行，總敞口較低。

The court stressed that only the pre-delisting value and proven additional losses could be claimed. Binance remains involved but with reduced liability and no obligation to cover projected gains.

法院強調，只有預先列出的價值和證明的額外損失才能被要求。 Binance仍然參與其中，但責任降低，沒有承保預計收益的義務。

Meanwhile, Binance continues to dominate crypto trading, with Dune Analytics reporting over $5 billion in daily wallet volume. The UK is also increasing regulatory oversight, mandating detailed transaction reporting from 2026.

同時，Binance繼續主導加密交易，Dune Analytics報告的每日錢包數量超過50億美元。英國還在增加監管監督，從2026年開始強制詳細的交易報告。

Binance and other platforms must comply with growing legal and regulatory scrutiny across the crypto industry.

Binance和其他平台必須遵守加密行業的法律和監管審查。