市值: $3.2982T 0.660%
體積(24小時): $66.2319B -30.960%
  • 市值: $3.2982T 0.660%
  • 體積(24小時): $66.2319B -30.960%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $3.2982T 0.660%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$107331.208921 USD

0.15%

ethereum
ethereum

$2432.212853 USD

0.50%

tether
tether

$1.000302 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.188626 USD

0.65%

bnb
bnb

$648.691060 USD

0.50%

solana
solana

$149.879150 USD

4.72%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999873 USD

0.00%

tron
tron

$0.275249 USD

0.65%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.163208 USD

0.89%

cardano
cardano

$0.565072 USD

0.85%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$37.730988 USD

2.70%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$493.111216 USD

-1.76%

sui
sui

$2.788212 USD

3.41%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.331088 USD

1.60%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.120728 USD

0.61%

加密貨幣新聞文章

比特幣SV(BSV)投資者失去了針對Binance的集體訴訟

2025/05/22 21:06

英國上訴法院部分駁回了比特幣SV投資者對主要加密交易所的訴訟

Major crypto exchange Binance has partially won a lawsuit brought by Bitcoin SV (BSV) investors, who are seeking billions in damages over the alleged conspiracy to delist the token in 2019, reports the Financial Times.

《金融時報》報導,少校的加密交易所均值部分贏得了比特幣SV(BSV)投資者提起的訴訟,他們在2019年尋求數十億美元的賠償金。

The case, which reached the United Kingdom’s Court of Appeal, began after several BSV investors sued Binance, along with several other exchanges, for allegedly agreeing to delist the token.

該案到達了英國上訴法院,在數名BSV投資者起訴Binance以及其他幾次交易所之後,該案開始了,據稱據稱同意將令牌授予代幣。

The investors, who held BSV through the delisting period (sub-class B), were not entitled to billions in speculative damages based on BSV’s hypothetical growth, the court ruled on Monday, May 21.

法院於5月21日星期一裁定,基於BSV的假設增長,投資者在延期期間(子級B)持有BSV(子級B)。

Those investors claimed over 8.9 billion pounds ($11.9 billion) in damages, asserting that Binance’s delisting deprived holders of the chance to profit from BSV’s potential rise to a “top-tier cryptocurrency” like Bitcoin (BTC) or Bitcoin Cash (BCH).

那些投資者聲稱,賠償金超過89億英鎊(119億美元),並聲稱Binance將剝奪的持有人從BSV的潛在上升到“頂級加密貨幣”(如比特幣(BTC)(BTC)或比特幣現金(BCH)等“頂級加密貨幣”。

However, the Court of Appeal ruled that the ‘foregone growth effect’ theory was not applicable in this case.

但是,上訴法院裁定,在這種情況下,“序列增長效應”理論不適用於。

“BSV was obviously not a unique cryptocurrency without reasonably similar cryptocurrencies, as is shown by the representative’s own selection of Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash as the relevant comparators,” stated the judges.

法官說:“沒有相似的加密貨幣,BSV顯然不是獨特的加密貨幣,這是代表自己選擇比特幣和比特幣現金作為相關比較者所表明的。”

Sub-class B’s central claim was that the delisting led to the investors being unable to benefit from the cryptocurrency’s price appreciation, but the court said those investors had the opportunity to mitigate their losses by selling or reinvesting in other crypto assets.

子級B的中心主張是,偏見導致投資者無法從加密貨幣的價格讚賞中受益,但法院表示,這些投資者有機會通過在其他加密貨幣資產中出售或重新投資或再投資來減輕損失。

“They had a duty to mitigate their losses,” wrote Master of the Rolls Sir Geoffrey Vos. “They cannot recover losses that they could reasonably have mitigated.”

“他們有責任減輕損失,”勞斯·沃斯·沃斯爵士爵士大師寫道。 “他們無法收回能夠合理減輕的損失。”

Earlier this year, the crypto exchange also applied to strike out a claim by members of a ‘securities class’ who are seeking to sue Binance in the British courts.

今年早些時候,加密貨幣交易所還申請了尋求在英國法院起訴Binance的“證券級別”成員的索賠。

The investors, who bought Binance tokens between 2018 and 2021, are attempting to sue the exchange for allegedly breaching the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

投資者在2018年至2021年之間購買了Binance代幣的投資者正在企圖起訴據稱違反《金融服務和市場法》 2000年的交易所。

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年06月29日 其他文章發表於