比特幣，硬叉和Luke Dashjr：加密茶壺中的暴風雨？

研究圍繞盧克·達什（Luke Dashjr）的爭議以及潛在的比特幣硬叉，解決了指控和社區反應。

Hold onto your hats, folks! The Bitcoin world got a little spicy recently with allegations swirling around Luke Dashjr, a prominent figure in the Bitcoin Knots project, and the dreaded words: 'hard fork.' Was Dashjr really plotting to shake up the very foundations of Bitcoin? Let's dive into the drama.

抓住你的帽子，伙計們！比特幣世界最近有些辣，指控圍繞著比特幣結項目的著名人物盧克·達什（Luke Dashjr）旋轉，而可怕的話語是：“硬叉”。 Dashjr真的密謀動搖了比特幣的基礎嗎？讓我們深入研究戲劇。

The Allegations: A Trusted Committee to Alter the Blockchain?

指控：一個可信賴的委員會更改區塊鏈？

The saga began with an article claiming Dashjr was considering a hard fork to create a multisig committee with the power to alter Bitcoin's blockchain, particularly to remove illicit content. The article cited leaked messages where Dashjr supposedly said, "Either Bitcoin dies or we have to trust someone." Cue the collective gasp from Bitcoin enthusiasts everywhere!

傳奇始於一篇文章，聲稱達什吉（Dashjr）正在考慮建立一個有權改變比特幣區塊鏈的多西格委員會，尤其是去除非法內容。文章引用了洩露的消息，達什吉據說“比特幣死亡，或者我們必須信任某人。”從各地的比特幣愛好者那裡提示集體喘息！

However, Dashjr vehemently denied these claims, calling them "fabricated nonsense." He emphasized that no hard fork was being discussed, dismissing the report as slanderous. So, what's the real story?

但是，達什吉（Dashjr）強烈否認了這些說法，稱它們為“捏造的胡說八道”。他強調，沒有討論過艱難的叉子，將報告視為誹謗。那麼，真實的故事是什麼？

Bitcoin Knots vs. Bitcoin Core: A Clash of Ideologies

比特幣結與比特幣核心：意識形態的衝突

At the heart of the matter lies a difference in philosophy between Bitcoin Knots, which Dashjr maintains, and the more widely used Bitcoin Core. Bitcoin Knots enforces stricter transaction policies, blocking non-financial data like Ordinals and Runes tokens, which Dashjr believes is essential for protecting Bitcoin's integrity. Bitcoin Core, on the other hand, takes a more permissive approach.

這件事的核心在於達什（Dashjr）所堅持的比特幣結與更廣泛使用的比特幣核心之間的哲學差異。比特幣結會執行更嚴格的交易策略，阻止非財務數據（如序數和符文令牌），Dashjr認為這對於保護比特幣的完整性至關重要。另一方面，比特幣核心採用了更寬鬆的方法。

The hard fork allegations ignited this existing divide, with critics arguing that Dashjr's vision could compromise Bitcoin's immutability. Supporters, however, dismissed the rumors as a smear campaign against his stricter policies.

硬叉指控激發了這種現有的鴻溝，批評家認為達什吉的願景可能會損害比特幣的不變性。然而，支持者駁斥了謠言，這是反對他更嚴格的政策的塗抹運動。

Community Reactions: A Mix of Concern and Dismissal

社區反應：關注和解僱的混合

The Bitcoin community reacted with a mix of concern and outright dismissal. Some developers voiced worries over Dashjr's approach, while others viewed the claims as an attempt to discredit him. Udi Wertheimer, co-founder of the Taproot Wizards Ordinals project, defended Dashjr, calling the report a "hit piece" and "fake news."

比特幣社區充滿了關注和完全解僱的反應。一些開發人員對Dashjr的方法表示擔憂，而另一些開發人員則認為這些說法是抹黑他的企圖。 Taproot Wizards Ordinals Project的聯合創始人Udi Wertheimer為Dashjr辯護，稱該報告為“熱門單曲”和“假新聞”。

The Technical Side: ZKPs and Trust Assumptions

技術方面：ZKP和信任假設

The leaked messages also touched on the potential use of zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to filter spam. The idea involves a trusted multisig quorum in the Bitcoin network, vested with the authority to mark affected transactions and initiate their neutralization. While this could help with content moderation, it also introduces trust assumptions into a system built on trust minimization. This would require changing the very consensus rules, that is, activating a hard fork.

洩漏的消息還涉及了零知識證明（ZKP）的潛在用法來過濾垃圾郵件。這個想法涉及比特幣網絡中值得信賴的Multisig Quorum，並具有標記影響交易並啟動中和的權力。儘管這可能有助於內容審核，但它也將信任假設引入基於信任最小化的系統中。這將需要更改非常共識的規則，即激活硬叉。

Market Reaction: A Slight Dip in Bitcoin's Price

市場反應：比特幣的價格略有下跌

In the wake of the controversy, Bitcoin's price saw a slight dip. While there's no direct evidence linking the two, uncertainty surrounding the network's future can lead to market volatility.

在發生爭議之後，比特幣的價格略有下跌。儘管沒有直接的證據將兩者聯繫起來，但圍繞網絡未來的不確定性可能會導致市場波動。

The Big Picture: Governance and Immutability

大局：治理和不變性

This incident has reignited the ongoing debate about Bitcoin's governance, its immutability, and whether it should remain a neutral settlement layer or be actively governed by developers. It raises fundamental questions about trust, control, and the future of the network.

這一事件重新激發了有關比特幣的治理，其不變性以及是否應該保持中立定居層或由開發商積極控制的持續辯論。它提出了有關信任，控制和網絡未來的基本問題。

Personal Take: A Healthy Dose of Skepticism

個人看法：健康劑量的懷疑論

While the allegations against Dashjr are serious, it's crucial to approach them with a healthy dose of skepticism. The Bitcoin community is known for its passionate debates and diverse viewpoints. Before jumping to conclusions, it's essential to consider all sides of the story and focus on the facts. Given that Dashjr has denied these allegations, and that hard forks are incredibly difficult to implement without broad consensus, it seems premature to sound the alarm.

儘管針對Dashjr的指控是嚴重的，但至關重要的是要以健康的懷疑態度接近他們。比特幣社區以其熱情的辯論和各種觀點而聞名。在得出結論之前，必須考慮故事的各個方面並專注於事實。鑑於達什吉（Dashjr）否認了這些指控，而且如果沒有廣泛的共識，就難以實施難以實施的硬叉，因此發出警報似乎為時過早。

So, What's the Verdict?

那麼，判決是什麼？

As of now, it appears the hard fork talk was more of a tempest in a teapot than a real threat to Bitcoin's foundation. However, the incident highlights the ongoing tensions and debates within the Bitcoin community, reminding us that the future of this revolutionary technology is far from settled. And remember folks, always DYOR (do your own research) and stay skeptical!

截至目前，似乎硬叉談話更像是茶壺中的暴風雨，而不是對比特幣基礎的真正威脅。但是，該事件突出了比特幣社區中持續的緊張局勢和辯論，提醒我們，這項革命性技術的未來遠非如此。記住人們，總是染色（做自己的研究）並保持懷疑！