比特币，硬叉和Luke Dashjr：加密茶壶中的暴风雨？

研究围绕卢克·达什（Luke Dashjr）的争议以及潜在的比特币硬叉，解决了指控和社区反应。

Hold onto your hats, folks! The Bitcoin world got a little spicy recently with allegations swirling around Luke Dashjr, a prominent figure in the Bitcoin Knots project, and the dreaded words: 'hard fork.' Was Dashjr really plotting to shake up the very foundations of Bitcoin? Let's dive into the drama.

抓住你的帽子，伙计们！比特币世界最近有些辣，指控围绕着比特币结项目的著名人物卢克·达什（Luke Dashjr）旋转，而可怕的话语是：“硬叉”。 Dashjr真的密谋动摇了比特币的基础吗？让我们深入研究戏剧。

The Allegations: A Trusted Committee to Alter the Blockchain?

指控：一个可信赖的委员会更改区块链？

The saga began with an article claiming Dashjr was considering a hard fork to create a multisig committee with the power to alter Bitcoin's blockchain, particularly to remove illicit content. The article cited leaked messages where Dashjr supposedly said, "Either Bitcoin dies or we have to trust someone." Cue the collective gasp from Bitcoin enthusiasts everywhere!

传奇始于一篇文章，声称达什吉（Dashjr）正在考虑建立一个有权改变比特币区块链的多西格委员会，尤其是去除非法内容。文章引用了泄露的消息，达什吉据说“比特币死亡，或者我们必须信任某人。”从各地的比特币爱好者那里提示集体喘息！

However, Dashjr vehemently denied these claims, calling them "fabricated nonsense." He emphasized that no hard fork was being discussed, dismissing the report as slanderous. So, what's the real story?

但是，达什吉（Dashjr）强烈否认了这些说法，称它们为“捏造的胡说八道”。他强调，没有讨论过艰难的叉子，将报告视为诽谤。那么，真实的故事是什么？

Bitcoin Knots vs. Bitcoin Core: A Clash of Ideologies

比特币结与比特币核心：意识形态的冲突

At the heart of the matter lies a difference in philosophy between Bitcoin Knots, which Dashjr maintains, and the more widely used Bitcoin Core. Bitcoin Knots enforces stricter transaction policies, blocking non-financial data like Ordinals and Runes tokens, which Dashjr believes is essential for protecting Bitcoin's integrity. Bitcoin Core, on the other hand, takes a more permissive approach.

这件事的核心在于达什（Dashjr）所坚持的比特币结与更广泛使用的比特币核心之间的哲学差异。比特币结会执行更严格的交易策略，阻止非财务数据（如序数和符文令牌），Dashjr认为这对于保护比特币的完整性至关重要。另一方面，比特币核心采用了更宽松的方法。

The hard fork allegations ignited this existing divide, with critics arguing that Dashjr's vision could compromise Bitcoin's immutability. Supporters, however, dismissed the rumors as a smear campaign against his stricter policies.

硬叉指控激发了这种现有的鸿沟，批评家认为达什吉的愿景可能会损害比特币的不变性。然而，支持者驳斥了谣言，这是反对他更严格的政策的涂抹运动。

Community Reactions: A Mix of Concern and Dismissal

社区反应：关注和解雇的混合

The Bitcoin community reacted with a mix of concern and outright dismissal. Some developers voiced worries over Dashjr's approach, while others viewed the claims as an attempt to discredit him. Udi Wertheimer, co-founder of the Taproot Wizards Ordinals project, defended Dashjr, calling the report a "hit piece" and "fake news."

比特币社区充满了关注和完全解雇的反应。一些开发人员对Dashjr的方法表示担忧，而另一些开发人员则认为这些说法是抹黑他的企图。 Taproot Wizards Ordinals Project的联合创始人Udi Wertheimer为Dashjr辩护，称该报告为“热门单曲”和“假新闻”。

The Technical Side: ZKPs and Trust Assumptions

技术方面：ZKP和信任假设

The leaked messages also touched on the potential use of zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to filter spam. The idea involves a trusted multisig quorum in the Bitcoin network, vested with the authority to mark affected transactions and initiate their neutralization. While this could help with content moderation, it also introduces trust assumptions into a system built on trust minimization. This would require changing the very consensus rules, that is, activating a hard fork.

泄漏的消息还涉及了零知识证明（ZKP）的潜在用法来过滤垃圾邮件。这个想法涉及比特币网络中值得信赖的Multisig Quorum，并具有标记影响交易并启动中和的权力。尽管这可能有助于内容审核，但它也将信任假设引入基于信任最小化的系统中。这将需要更改非常共识的规则，即激活硬叉。

Market Reaction: A Slight Dip in Bitcoin's Price

市场反应：比特币的价格略有下跌

In the wake of the controversy, Bitcoin's price saw a slight dip. While there's no direct evidence linking the two, uncertainty surrounding the network's future can lead to market volatility.

在发生争议之后，比特币的价格略有下跌。尽管没有直接的证据将两者联系起来，但围绕网络未来的不确定性可能会导致市场波动。

The Big Picture: Governance and Immutability

大局：治理和不变性

This incident has reignited the ongoing debate about Bitcoin's governance, its immutability, and whether it should remain a neutral settlement layer or be actively governed by developers. It raises fundamental questions about trust, control, and the future of the network.

这一事件重新激发了有关比特币的治理，其不变性以及是否应该保持中立定居层或由开发商积极控制的持续辩论。它提出了有关信任，控制和网络未来的基本问题。

Personal Take: A Healthy Dose of Skepticism

个人看法：健康剂量的怀疑论

While the allegations against Dashjr are serious, it's crucial to approach them with a healthy dose of skepticism. The Bitcoin community is known for its passionate debates and diverse viewpoints. Before jumping to conclusions, it's essential to consider all sides of the story and focus on the facts. Given that Dashjr has denied these allegations, and that hard forks are incredibly difficult to implement without broad consensus, it seems premature to sound the alarm.

尽管针对Dashjr的指控是严重的，但至关重要的是要以健康的怀疑态度接近他们。比特币社区以其热情的辩论和各种观点而闻名。在得出结论之前，必须考虑故事的各个方面并专注于事实。鉴于达什吉（Dashjr）否认了这些指控，而且如果没有广泛的共识，就难以实施难以实施的硬叉，因此发出警报似乎为时过早。

So, What's the Verdict?

那么，判决是什么？

As of now, it appears the hard fork talk was more of a tempest in a teapot than a real threat to Bitcoin's foundation. However, the incident highlights the ongoing tensions and debates within the Bitcoin community, reminding us that the future of this revolutionary technology is far from settled. And remember folks, always DYOR (do your own research) and stay skeptical!

截至目前，似乎硬叉谈话更像是茶壶中的暴风雨，而不是对比特币基础的真正威胁。但是，该事件突出了比特币社区中持续的紧张局势和辩论，提醒我们，这项革命性技术的未来远非如此。记住人们，总是染色（做自己的研究）并保持怀疑！