比特幣的艱苦辯論：危險的核心原則？

查看比特幣中最新的硬叉提案，以及它與不變性和抵抗的核心原則的衝突。

Bitcoin's Hard Fork Debate: Core Principles at Stake?

比特幣的艱苦辯論：危險的核心原則？

The Bitcoin world is buzzing, and not in a good way. A new proposal involving a hard fork has surfaced, sparking heated debate about the very essence of Bitcoin. Is it about to lose its core identity?

比特幣世界嗡嗡作響，不是很好。一項涉及硬叉的新提案浮出水面，引發了有關比特幣本質的激烈辯論。它即將失去其核心身份？

What's the Fuss About?

大驚小怪？

A leaked proposal from Bitcoin Knots maintainer Luke Dashjr suggests a hard fork introducing a trusted multisignature committee. This committee would have the power to retroactively alter data on the blockchain to remove illicit content, using zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs). The idea is to mitigate the risk of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) being mined into a block. Sounds noble, right? But here's where it gets tricky.

比特幣結的一項洩露的提議維護者盧克·達什（Luke Dashjr）表明，一個艱難的叉子引入了一個值得信賴的多符號委員會。該委員會將有權使用零知識證明（ZKP）追溯更改區塊鏈的數據以清除非法內容。這個想法是減輕將兒童性虐待材料（CSAM）開採到一個街區的風險。聽起來很高，對吧？但這是棘手的地方。

Immutability Under Threat?

不變性受到威脅？

The big issue? This proposal clashes head-on with Bitcoin's core principle of immutability. Critics argue that allowing a committee to rewrite history effectively erases Bitcoin's censorship resistance. Imagine a world where Bitcoin could be censored or manipulated by a select few. That's a scary thought for many Bitcoin enthusiasts.

大問題？該提議與比特幣的不變性核心原則進行了衝突。批評者認為，允許委員會重寫歷史可以有效地消除比特幣的審查制度。想像一個世界，可以審查比特幣，被選定的少數人審查或操縱。對於許多比特幣愛好者來說，這是一個可怕的想法。

BitMEX Research called the idea “more and more like an attack on Bitcoin’s key censorship resistance characteristics.” Blockstream CEO Adam Back echoed these concerns, warning about the slippery slope of censorship tech.

Bitmex研究稱該想法“越來越像對比特幣關鍵審查制度抵抗特徵的攻擊。” Blockstream首席執行官Adam Back回應了這些擔憂，警告了審查技術的濕滑坡度。

A Slippery Slope to Permissioned Networks?

信徒網絡的滑坡？

Some fear that this hard fork could turn Bitcoin into a permissioned network, controlled by a central authority. Abra founder Bill Barhydt even suggested that “Bitcoin War 2 seems imminent.” The concern is that a small faction could hijack the narrative and compromise Bitcoin's decentralized nature.

有人擔心這種堅硬的叉子會將比特幣變成一個由中央當局控制的許可網絡。 ABRA創始人比爾·巴爾希特（Bill Barhydt）甚至建議“比特幣戰爭2迫在眉睫”。關注的是，一個小派係可以劫持敘事和妥協比特幣的分散性質。

Samson Mow from JAN3 urged caution, emphasizing that development should be approached with utmost care and a long-term perspective. “We simply want Bitcoin to be secure, unchanging, and conservative,” he stated.

Jan3的Samson Mow敦促謹慎，強調應盡最大努力和長期觀點來進行發展。他說：“我們只是希望比特幣保持安全，不變和保守。”

Circle's Reversible Transactions: Another Challenge?

Circle的可逆交易：另一個挑戰？

Interestingly, this debate coincides with stablecoin giant Circle exploring “reversible transactions.” While aimed at increasing user confidence by allowing refunds in cases of fraud or mistakes, this move also challenges the immutability of the blockchain. Circle claims that payments on its Arc blockchain cannot be directly reversed, but instead, create an extra layer where all parties agree to make counter-payments, similar to how credit card refunds work.

有趣的是，這場辯論與Stablecoin巨型圈子探索了“可逆交易”。儘管允許在欺詐或錯誤的情況下退款來增加用戶信心，但此舉也挑戰了區塊鏈的不可分割性。 Circle聲稱，其ARC區塊鏈上的付款不能直接逆轉，而是創建一個額外的層，所有當事方同意進行反付款，類似於信用卡退款的工作方式。

My Two Sats

我的兩個坐著

While the intentions behind these proposals might be good, altering Bitcoin's fundamental principles is a dangerous game. Censorship resistance and immutability are what make Bitcoin unique and valuable. Compromising these traits could undermine trust in the entire system.

儘管這些建議背後的意圖可能是好的，但改變比特幣的基本原理是一項危險的遊戲。審查制度和不變性使比特幣獨特而有價值。損害這些特徵可能會破壞對整個系統的信任。

It's like trying to improve a classic recipe by adding ingredients that completely change its flavor. Sometimes, the original is best.

這就像試圖通過添加完全改變其風味的成分來改善經典食譜。有時，原件是最好的。

The Road Ahead

前面的道路

As of now, Dashjr hasn't released a formal specification or activation pathway for the hard fork. But the debate is far from over. The Bitcoin community is fiercely protective of its core values, and any attempt to tamper with them will be met with strong resistance.

截至目前，DASHJR尚未發布針對硬叉的正式規範或激活途徑。但是辯論還遠遠沒有結束。比特幣社區強烈保護其核心價值，任何與之篡改的嘗試都將具有強烈的抵抗力。

So, what does this all mean? Well, it means Bitcoin is still a hotbed of innovation, debate, and occasional drama. Stay tuned, because this story is far from over!

那麼，這全是什麼意思？好吧，這意味著比特幣仍然是創新，辯論和偶爾戲劇的溫床。請繼續關注，因為這個故事還遠遠沒有結束！

In the meantime, keep stacking those sats and remember: Bitcoin is supposed to be unchangeable, unless we all agree to change it... which, let's be honest, is easier said than done!

同時，請繼續堆疊那些SAT並記住：除非我們所有人都同意更改它，否則比特幣應該是不變的……老實說，這更容易說起來做不做！