比特幣在2025年被宣佈為11次死亡

今年比特幣的上升超過104,000美元並沒有使其懷疑論者保持沉默。實際上，2025年已經看到了11種新的“死亡”主張 - 公開聲明加密貨幣注定要失敗 - 超過了去年的總數。

Bitcoin's critics aren't easily deterred. Even as the cryptocurrency surges past $104,000 this year, setting a new all-time high, the murmurs of its demise haven'output: t ceased. In fact, 2025 has already seen 11 new “death” claims — public declarations that the cryptocurrency is doomed — surpassing last year’s total.

比特幣的批評家不容易受到威脅。即使加密貨幣今年飆升了104,000美元，這是一個新的歷史最高水平，其死亡天堂之外的雜音：t停止了。實際上，2025年已經看到了11個新的“死亡”主張 - 公開聲明加密貨幣注定要失敗 - 超過了去年的總數。

These obituaries often surge during bull runs, a pattern seen in 2017 with Ethereum and now repeating with Bitcoin. Since 2010, Bitcoin has been declared dead 430 times.

這些itu告經常在公牛奔跑期間激增，這種模式在2017年與以太坊一起出現，現在與比特幣重複。自2010年以來，比特幣被宣佈為430次死亡。

After a brief lull in 2024, pronouncements of Bitcoin's demise returned this year, beginning in January with a gloomy prediction from Nobel economist Eugene Fama, who questioned the cryptocurrency's long-term viability.

經過2024年短暫的平息，對比特幣去世的聲明從今年恢復了，從一月份開始，諾貝爾經濟學家尤金·法加（Eugene Fama）的陰鬱預測質疑加密貨幣的長期生存能力。

Fama, known for his contributions to asset pricing theory, expressed skepticism about Bitcoin's ability to sustain its value over time, considering the external factors that have influenced its performance.

Fama以其對資產定價理論的貢獻而聞名，他對比特幣隨著時間的推移維持其價值的能力表示懷疑，考慮到影響其績效的外部因素。

"People say it's decentralized, but it's not really decentralized. It's been influenced heavily by macroeconomic events, like the invasion of Ukraine, which had a big impact on Bitcoin's price," Fama said.

Fama說：“人們說這是分散的，但並沒有真正分散。它受到宏觀經濟事件的影響，例如對烏克蘭的入侵對比特幣的價格產生了很大的影響。”

However, despite his doubts, Fama acknowledged the significant attention that Bitcoin has garnered.

然而，儘管他懷疑，Fama還是承認比特幣獲得了重大關注。

"It's amazing how much interest there is in Bitcoin. Economists are thinking about it a lot now, and that's useful," he added.

他補充說：“令人驚訝的是，比特幣有多大的興趣。經濟學家現在正在考慮這件事，這很有用。”

Later, Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko weighed in, criticizing Bitcoin for its environmental footprint amid a broader discussion on cryptocurrencies and their energy consumption.

後來，Solana的聯合創始人Anatoly Yakovenko參與進來，批評比特幣在有關加密貨幣及其能耗的更廣泛討論中的環境足跡。

Yakovenko argued that Solana, with its low transaction fees and efficient technology, offers a more sustainable option for the future of finance.

Yakovenko認為，索拉納（Solana）的交易費用低和有效的技術為財務的未來提供了更可持續的選擇。

"Bitcoin is a chain that's very good at being the first chain, but it's not necessarily good at being the last chain," Yakovenko said.

Yakovenko說：“比特幣是一條非常擅長成為第一個連鎖店的連鎖店，但不一定擅長成為最後一條鏈。”

He added that Solana, which boasts faster transaction speeds and a smaller carbon footprint, is better positioned to serve the evolving needs of the global financial system.

他補充說，擁有更快的交易速度和較小的碳足蹟的Solana可以更好地滿足全球金融體係不斷發展的需求。

"If you look at the energy efficiency and the transaction throughput, Solana is substantially better. We’re able to do more transactions with less energy, which is important as we think about the environmental impact."

“如果您查看能源效率和交易吞吐量，Solana會更好。我們能夠以更少的能量進行更多的交易，這很重要，因為我們考慮了環境影響。”

These criticisms come as Bitcoin continues to chart new highs, recently surpassing the $100,000 milestone.

這些批評是因為比特幣繼續繪製新的高點，最近超過了100,000美元的里程碑。

Despite the backlash, Bitcoin's market cap and institutional interest continue to grow. If anything, the repeated forecasts of failure seem to underscore the asset's resilience — or, at the very least, its ability to stay in the global spotlight.input:

儘管有反對，比特幣的市值和機構利益繼續增長。如果有的話，反复的失敗預測似乎強調了資產的韌性，或者至少是其留在全球聚光燈中的能力。輸入：