比特幣核心開發人員計劃刪除OP_Return輸出的80字節尺寸限制

比特幣核心開發人員計劃在即將到來的軟件版本中刪除OP_Return輸出的長期80字節尺寸限制，這一舉動激發了開發社區內的分歧。

Bitcoin Core developers are planning to remove the size limit on OP_RETURN outputs in an upcoming software release, a move that has sparked disagreement within the development community.

比特幣核心開發人員計劃在即將到來的軟件版本中刪除OP_Return輸出的尺寸限制，此舉激發了開發社區內的分歧。

OP_RETURN allows small amounts of data to be included in Bitcoin transactions with an unspendable output (UTXO). The concept has grown in popularity during the recent ordinoals and inscription boom.

OP_RETURN允許將少量數據包含在帶有無法投入輸出（UTXO）的比特幣交易中。在最近的ordino骨和銘文繁榮期間，這個概念越來越受歡迎。

According to Bitcoin Core contributor Greg Sanders, the new update would completely eliminate the current 80-byte size limit and “allow any number of these outputs." In a May 5 GitHub post, Sanders said that the restriction had outlived its purpose and lifting the cap would encourage less harmful onchain behavior.

根據比特幣核心貢獻者格雷格·桑德斯（Greg Sanders）的說法，新的更新將完全消除當前的80字節尺寸限制，並“允許任何數量這些輸出”。桑德斯在5月5日的GitHub帖子中說，該限制已經超出了其目的並舉起帽子將鼓勵較小的有害骨鏈行為。

“The cap merely channels them into more large-data inscriptions, other participants that bypass the 80-byte threshold. When the polite avenue is blocked, determined users turn to impolite ones. Some use 'bare multisig' or craft 'fake output public keys' that do enter the UTXO set, exactly the outcome OP_RETURN was invented to avoid."

“帽子僅將它們引導到更大的數據銘文中，其他繞過80字節閾值的參與者。當禮貌的大道被阻止時，確定的用戶轉向不禮貌的人。有些人使用“裸露的multisig'或手工藝'偽造的公共密鑰'確實輸入UTXO套裝，確切地發明了OP_RETURN的發明。 ”

Developers considered three options: keep the cap, raise it, or remove it entirely. The first two were deemed arbitrary and ineffective, while the third option garnered broad — though not unanimous — support, according to the GitHub discussion.

開發人員考慮了三個選擇：保持蓋帽，抬起或完全刪除。根據Github的討論，前兩個被認為是任意和無效的，而第三個選擇獲得了廣泛的支持（儘管不是一致）的支持。

Sanders argued that lifting the cap would help maintain a cleaner UTXO set, reduce transaction burdens, and reaffirm simple, transparent rules within Bitcoin’s protocol.

桑德斯認為，舉起蓋子將有助於維持更清潔的UTXO集，減輕交易負擔，並在比特幣協議中重申簡單，透明的規則。

However, not everyone agrees. Critics including JAN3 CEO Samson Mow called the removal an “undesirable change for a number of reasons.”

但是，並不是每個人都同意。包括JAN3首席執行官Samson Mow在內的批評家稱，撤職是“出於多種原因的不良變化”。