Is XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) the Next Bitcoin? Could It Be a Millionaire-Maker?

It's been a wild ride for cryptocurrency investors during the past few months -- and that's saying something. Bitcoin surpassed the $100,000 mark, reaching more than $109,000

It's safe to say that cryptocurrency investors have had a wild ride over the past few months. Bitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC) crossed the $100,000 mark, reaching highs of over $109,000 just 16 years after its creation.

While the price has pulled back to around $102,000 amid broader market uncertainty, investors still seem optimistic that Bitcoin will continue to grow. That optimism has spilled over into so-called altcoins, which are looking to repeat the extreme successes of the original crypto.

In particular, XRP (CRYPTO:XRP) has attracted a loyal following. The crypto token, which is designed to help facilitate international money transfers quickly and efficiently, has seen its price rise more than 300% over the past six months alone. Could XRP repeat the success of Bitcoin, and could it make you a millionaire?

A look at XRP

Let's take a step back and examine what XRP is and why it provides value. As mentioned above, the crypto token is designed to act as a bridge between banks and other financial institutions to help them transfer money internationally. It's no secret that traditional methods are sluggish and can take days or even weeks, while XRP-enabled transfers can be settled almost instantly.

The fact that XRP is designed to provide real-world value and has a record of use by the industry it's targeting makes it stand out in a market that has been overrun by meme coins. But can we really quantify that value, and is it enough to justify the enormous $135 billion market capitalization that XRP has already achieved?

It's difficult to come up with a direct comparison, but I think a good starting point is Visa (NYSE:V). The company operates a vast global payment network, which isn't completely dissimilar to XRP's network. Yes, there are fundamental differences, but I still think it's useful.

Both networks are used by billions of people around the world, and they facilitate trillions of dollars in transactions each year. But while Visa handles more than 640 million transactions per day, XRP's blockchain processes just 1 million. Despite this disparity, Visa's market cap is only about five times greater than XRP's.

Now, does that seem proportional considering the vast difference in transaction volume and the fact that Visa's network is used for a broader range of transactions? It seems to me that either Visa is severely undervalued, or XRP is massively overvalued. My money is on the latter.

Image source: Getty Images.Maybe this isn't a completely fair comparison, so let's try another way to think about it. The claim is often made that if XRP is widely adopted, it will capture a significant portion of the hundreds of billions of dollars that banks pay in transaction fees each year.

But the flaw in that logic, as I see it, is that the only reason banks are attracted to XRP in the first place is because its cost is minimal -- several magnitudes less than traditional methods. And it follows that even if it managed to handle transactions for the whole market, the small fees it would collect would amount to a few hundred million dollars or low billions. Again, that doesn't seem to justify the current market cap.

The question at hand

XRP may be faster and cheaper than traditional banking methods, but that doesn't guarantee adoption, and it certainly doesn't guarantee returns to investors. While there has been a surge in interest in XRP over the past few months, I'm skeptical of the token's long-term viability, especially considering how much of its future growth seems to be already priced into the token price today.

Although I fully admit that valuing crypto is difficult and often defies a lot of traditional investing wisdom, I don't see XRP growing in the way it needs to in order to be a good investment, let alone qualify it as a potential millionaire-maker, even by the most generous standards. I would also caution readers from getting too caught up in this sort of thinking and instead adopt a diversified investment approach, focusing on the long term.